In Joomla! before 3.9.19, missing token checks in com_postinstall lead to CSRF.

cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities were present in Tufin SecureTrack, affecting all versions prior to R20-2 GA.

pramodmahato BlogCMS through 2019-12-31 has admin/changepass.php CSRF.

Tweetbot 1.3.3 for Mac, and 2.8.5 for iPad and iPhone, does not require confirmation of (1) follow or (2) favorite actions, which allows remote attackers to automatically force the user to perform undesired actions, as demonstrated via the tweetbot:///follow/ URL.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in html/json.html on HP 2620 switches allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change an administrative password via the setPassword method.

D-Link DIR-865L Ax 1.20B01 Beta devices allow CSRF.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Drupal Core Form API does not properly handle certain form input from cross-site requests, which can lead to other vulnerabilities.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the D-Link DSL-6740U gateway (Rev. H1) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change administrator credentials or enable remote management services to (1) Custom Services in Port Forwarding, (2) Port Triggering Entries, (3) URL Filters in Parental Control, (4) Print Server settings, (5) QoS Queue Setup, or (6) QoS Classification Entries.

An issue was discovered in the SiteOrigin Page Builder plugin before 2.10.16 for WordPress. The action_builder_content function did not do any nonce verification, allowing for requests to be forged on behalf of an administrator. The panels_data $_POST variable allows for malicious JavaScript to be executed in the victim's browser.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Training Center allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCul25567.

iSmartgate PRO 1.5.9 is vulnerable to CSRF via the busca parameter in the form used for searching for users, accessible via /index.php. (This can be combined with reflected XSS.)

The data-tables-generator-by-supsystic plugin before 1.9.92 for WordPress lacks CSRF nonce checks for AJAX actions. One consequence of this is stored XSS.

Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery.

The Western Digital WD Discovery application before 3.8.229 for MyCloud Home on Windows and macOS is vulnerable to CSRF, with impacts such as stealing data, modifying disk contents, or exhausting disk space.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to change the password of any given user by exploiting this feature leading to account takeover.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Global Site Selector (GSS) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuh42164.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/update.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify arbitrary user accounts via an edit user action.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists on the Secure Gateway component of Schneider Electric's PowerSCADA Anywhere v1.0 redistributed with PowerSCADA Expert v8.1 and PowerSCADA Expert v8.2 and Citect Anywhere version 1.0 for multiple state-changing requests. This type of attack requires some level of social engineering in order to get a legitimate user to click on or access a malicious link/site containing the CSRF attack.

mailcow 0.14, as used in "mailcow: dockerized" and other products, has CSRF.

Apache JSPWiki user preferences form is vulnerable to CSRF attacks, which can lead to account takeover. Apache JSPWiki users should upgrade to 2.11.2 or later.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Puppet Enterprise (PE) before 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that deleting a (1) report, (2) group, or (3) class or possibly have other unspecified impact.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/action/logout.php in SPIP before 2.1.24 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that logout the user via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 7.12 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that end a session via the user/logout URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue, by considering the "security benefit against platform complexity and performance impact" and concluding that a change to the logout behavior is not planned because "for most sites it is not worth the trade-off.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TEQneers SEO Enhancements (tq_seo) extension before 5.0.1 for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Improper Authorization vulnerability of Pepperl+Fuchs P+F Comtrol RocketLinx ES7510-XT, ES8509-XT, ES8510-XT, ES9528-XTv2, ES7506, ES7510, ES7528, ES8508, ES8508F, ES8510, ES8510-XTE, ES9528/ES9528-XT (all versions) and ICRL-M-8RJ45/4SFP-G-DIN, ICRL-M-16RJ45/4CP-G-DIN FW 1.2.3 and below is prone to unauthenticated device administration.

TypesetterCMS v5.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which is exploited via a crafted POST request.

Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the web interface.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Checkmarx Plugin 2022.1.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified webserver using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

clearsystem.php in NukeViet 4.4 allows CSRF with resultant HTML injection via the deltype parameter to the admin/index.php?nv=webtools&op=clearsystem URI.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin 1.20 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins send an HTTP request to an attacker-controlled URL and have it parse an XML response.

The Mobile browser color select plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_update_data() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

LibreHealth EMR v2.0.0 is affected by systemic CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface for cumin in Red Hat Enterprise MRG Grid 2.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of cumin users for unspecified requests.

An issue was discovered in Castle Rock SNMPc Online 12.10.10 before 2020-01-28. There is pervasive CSRF.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SCP publisher Plugin 1.8 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified SSH server using attacker-specified credentials.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Web UI of Secomea GateManager allows phishing attacker to issue get request in logged in user session.

In TYPO3 CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.16 and 10.0.0 through 10.4.1, it has been discovered that the backend user interface and install tool are vulnerable to a same-site request forgery. A backend user can be tricked into interacting with a malicious resource an attacker previously managed to upload to the web server. Scripts are then executed with the privileges of the victims' user session. In a worst-case scenario, new admin users can be created which can directly be used by an attacker. The vulnerability is basically a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) triggered by a cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) - but happens on the same target host - thus, it's actually a same-site request forgery. Malicious payload such as HTML containing JavaScript might be provided by either an authenticated backend user or by a non-authenticated user using a third party extension, e.g. file upload in a contact form with knowing the target location. To be successful, the attacked victim requires an active and valid backend or install tool user session at the time of the attack. This has been fixed in 9.5.17 and 10.4.2. The deployment of additional mitigation techniques is suggested as described below. - Sudo Mode Extension This TYPO3 extension intercepts modifications to security relevant database tables, e.g. those storing user accounts or storages of the file abstraction layer. Modifications need to confirmed again by the acting user providing their password again. This technique is known as sudo mode. This way, unintended actions happening in the background can be mitigated. - https://github.com/FriendsOfTYPO3/sudo-mode - https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/sudo_mode - Content Security Policy Content Security Policies tell (modern) browsers how resources served a particular site are handled. It is also possible to disallow script executions for specific locations. In a TYPO3 context, it is suggested to disallow direct script execution at least for locations /fileadmin/ and /uploads/.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Moxa OnCell G3110-HSPA Version 1.3 build 15082117 and previous versions, OnCell G3110-HSDPA Version 1.2 Build 09123015 and previous versions, OnCell G3150-HSDPA Version 1.4 Build 11051315 and previous versions, OnCell 5104-HSDPA, OnCell 5104-HSPA, and OnCell 5004-HSPA. The application does not sufficiently verify if a request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request, which could allow an attacker to modify the configuration of the device.

In Dolibarr 10.0.6, forms are protected with a CSRF token against CSRF attacks. The problem is any CSRF token in any user's session can be used in another user's session. CSRF tokens should not be valid in this situation.

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the communication API. The issue lies in the handling of the CombineFiles command, which allows an arbitrary file write with attacker controlled data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9830.

An issue was discovered in ProVide (formerly zFTPServer) through 13.1. The Admin Interface allows CSRF for actions such as: Change any username and password, admin ones included; Create/Delete users; Enable/Disable Services; Set a rogue update proxy; and Shutdown the server.

Gambio GX before 4.0.1.0 allows admin/admin.php CSRF.

The WPMK Ajax Finder WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the createplugin_atf_admin_setting_page() function found in the ~/inc/config/create-plugin-config.php file due to a missing nonce check which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 1.0.1.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Solution, as used in Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing and Unified MeetingPlace, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCui45209 and CSCui44674.

NVIDIA DGX servers, all DGX-1 with BMC firmware versions prior to 3.38.30, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the AMI BMC firmware in which the web application does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request, which can lead to information disclosure or code execution.

An issue was discovered in ProVide (formerly zFTPServer) through 13.1. CSRF exists in the User Web Interface, as demonstrated by granting filesystem access to the public for uploading and deleting files and directories.

CodeIgniter4 is the 4.x branch of CodeIgniter, a PHP full-stack web framework. A vulnerability in versions prior to 4.1.9 might allow remote attackers to bypass the CodeIgniter4 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.9. There are workarounds for this vulnerability, but users will still need to code as these after upgrading to v4.1.9. Otherwise, the CSRF protection may be bypassed. If auto-routing is enabled, check the request method in the controller method before processing. If auto-routing is disabled, either avoid using `$routes->add()` and instead use HTTP verbs in routes; or check the request method in the controller method before processing.

The Insights from Google PageSpeed WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not verify for CSRF before doing various actions such as deleting Custom URLs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks