Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC Documentum WebTop before 6.8P01, Documentum Administrator through 7.2, Documentum Digital Assets Manager through 6.5SP6, Documentum Web Publishers through 6.5SP7, and Documentum Task Space through 6.7SP2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-2518.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.5 SP1 before P3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC Documentum Web Development Kit (WDK) before 6.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that perform Docbase operations.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC Documentum WDK before 6.7SP1 P28 and 6.7SP2 before P15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web interface in EMC RSA NetWitness Informer before 2.0.5.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

EMC RSA Archer 5.4.1.3, 5.5.3.1, 5.5.2.3, 5.5.2, 5.5.1.3.1, 5.5.1.1 is potentially affected by a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. A remote low privileged attacker may potentially exploit the vulnerability to execute unauthorized requests on behalf of the victim, using the authenticated user's privileges.

SQL injection vulnerability in EMC RSA Key Manager (RKM) C Client 1.5.x allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the metadata section of encrypted key data.

EMC SourceOne Email Supervisor before 7.2 uses hardcoded encryption keys, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain access by examining how a program's code conducts cryptographic operations.

EMC RSA Security Analytics (SA) 10.x before 10.3, and RSA NetWitness NextGen 9.8, does not ensure that SA Core requests originate from the SA REST UI, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sending a Core request from a web browser or other unintended user agent.

EMC RSA Archer SmartSuite Framework 4.x and RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.2SP1 allow remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page.

EMC Cloud Tiering Appliance (aka CTA, formerly FMA) 9.0 and earlier, and Cloud Tiering Appliance Virtual Edition (CTA/VE) 9.0 and earlier, allows remote attackers to obtain GUI administrative access by sending a crafted file during the authentication phase.

RSA Archer GRC Platform prior to 6.2.0.5 is affected by an arbitrary file upload vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to upload malicious files via attachments to arbitrary paths on the web server.

An issue was discovered in EMC NetWorker (prior to 8.2.4.9, all supported 9.0.x versions, prior to 9.1.1.3, prior to 9.2.0.4). The Server service (nsrd) is affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of the software, or cause a denial of service, depending on the target system's platform.

EMC RSA Adaptive Authentication On-Premise (AAOP) 6.0.2.1 SP1 Patch 2, SP1 Patch 3, SP2, SP2 Patch 1, and SP3 does not properly implement Device Recovery and Device Identification, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended security restrictions on a (1) previously non-registered device or (2) registered device by sending unspecified "data elements."

EMC RSA Adaptive Authentication On-Premise (AAOP) 6.0.2.1 SP1 Patch 2, SP1 Patch 3, SP2, SP2 Patch 1, and SP3 does not properly perform forensic evaluation upon receipt of device tokens from mobile apps, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended application restrictions via a mobile device.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload files.

CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 4.0.4.0, and Aipo for ASP before 4.0.4.0, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify data.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the SMC SMCD3G-CCR (aka Comcast Business Gateway) with firmware before 1.4.0.49.2 allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that perform a login via goform/login, or hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (2) enable external logins via an mso_remote_enable action to goform/RemoteRange or (3) change DNS settings via a manual_dns_enable action to goform/Basic.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration page in the Recaptcha (aka WP-reCAPTCHA) plugin 2.9.8.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable the CAPTCHA requirement or insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) recaptcha_opt_pubkey, (2) recaptcha_opt_privkey, (3) re_tabindex, (4) error_blank, (5) error_incorrect, (6) mailhide_pub, (7) mailhide_priv, (8) mh_replace_link, or (9) mh_replace_title parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/conf_users_edit.php in PHP Link Directory (phpLD) 4.1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrator via the N action.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mutare EVM allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) change a PIN, (2) delete messages, (3) add a delivery address, or (4) change a delivery address.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Translation Management module 6.x before 6.x-1.21 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) before 2.0+rc3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that send email via an OMP request to OpenVAS Manager. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged to bypass authentication requirements for exploiting CVE-2011-0018.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in mainfile.php in Francisco Burzi PHP-Nuke 8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts or (2) grant the administrative privilege to a user account, related to a Referer check that uses a substring comparison.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the pieforms implementation in Mahara before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to any form, related to inappropriate regeneration of session keys.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified database server using attacker-specified credentials.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter.

A CSRF vulnerability in the UPnP MediaServer implementation in Freebox Server before 4.2.3.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Apache Archiva 1.0 through 1.2.2, and 1.3.x before 1.3.5, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList before 2.10.13 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) edit administrator accounts.

Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. The Symfony form component provides a CSRF protection mechanism by using a random token injected in the form and using the session to store and control the token submitted by the user. When using the FrameworkBundle, this protection can be enabled or disabled with the configuration. If the configuration is not specified, by default, the mechanism is enabled as long as the session is enabled. In a recent change in the way the configuration is loaded, the default behavior has been dropped and, as a result, the CSRF protection is not enabled in form when not explicitly enabled, which makes the application sensible to CSRF attacks. This issue has been resolved in the patch versions listed and users are advised to update. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

A flaw was found in moodle versions 3.5 to 3.5.2, 3.4 to 3.4.5, 3.3 to 3.3.8, 3.1 to 3.1.14 and earlier. The login form is not protected by a token to prevent login cross-site request forgery. Fixed versions include 3.6, 3.5.3, 3.4.6, 3.3.9 and 3.1.15.

The wp-customer-reviews plugin before 3.0.9 for WordPress has CSRF in the admin tools.

Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.

The fossura-tag-miner plugin before 1.1.5 for WordPress has CSRF.

The fluid-responsive-slideshow plugin before 2.2.7 for WordPress has frs_save CSRF with resultant stored XSS.

The BestWebSoft Htaccess plugin through 1.8.1 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=htaccess.php&action=htaccess_editor CSRF. The flag htccss_nonce_name passes the nonce to WordPress but the plugin does not validate it correctly, resulting in a wrong implementation of anti-CSRF protection. In this way, an attacker is able to direct the victim to a malicious web page that modifies the .htaccess file, and takes control of the website.

The PageLines theme 1.1.4 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin-post.php?page=pagelines CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Performance Management before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in edit_user.php in OSWAPP Warehouse Inventory System (aka OSWA-INV) through 2020-08-10 allows remote attackers to change the admin's password after an authenticated admin visits a third-party site.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to plugin Settings Update discovered in WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.4.4).

e107 2.1.8 has CSRF in 'usersettings.php' with an impact of changing details such as passwords of users including administrators.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Users module in Zikula before 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change account privileges via an edit access_permissions action to index.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in adduser.do in Symantec LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA) before 2.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts, and possibly have unspecified other impact, via the userRole parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Transmission 1.5 before 1.53 and 1.6 before 1.61 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

The Security/changepassword URL action in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.10 and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 passes a token as a GET parameter while changing a password through email, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive data and hijack the session via the HTTP referer logs on a server, aka "HTTP referer leakage."