Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2014-2901

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:02
Updated At-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected At-
Credits

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly issue certificates for a server's hostname.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:21 Nov, 2019 | 22:02
Updated At:06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly issue certificates for a server's hostname.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2901
x_refsource_MISC
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2901
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2901
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2901
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:21 Nov, 2019 | 23:15
Updated At:04 Dec, 2019 | 14:16

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly issue certificates for a server's hostname.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.5HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

wolfssl
wolfssl
>>wolfssl>>Versions before 3.2.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2cve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2901cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2901
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

111Records found

CVE-2014-2902
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:05
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly authorize CA certificate for signing other certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-25640
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-10
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.80% / 87.62%
||
7 Day CHG+0.19%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 01:07
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-2904
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Nov, 2019 | 22:08
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 10:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfssl before 3.2.0 has a server certificate that is not properly authorized for server authentication.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2017-8855
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 54.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 May, 2017 | 20:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfSSL before 3.11.0 does not prevent wc_DhAgree from accepting a malformed DH key.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CVE-2020-24585
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.24% / 46.63%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Aug, 2020 | 13:04
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the DTLS handshake implementation in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. Clear DTLS application_data messages in epoch 0 do not produce an out-of-order error. Instead, these messages are returned to the application.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CVE-2021-3336
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 56.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Jan, 2021 | 04:58
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

DoTls13CertificateVerify in tls13.c in wolfSSL before 4.7.0 does not cease processing for certain anomalous peer behavior (sending an ED22519, ED448, ECC, or RSA signature without the corresponding certificate). The client side is affected because man-in-the-middle attackers can impersonate TLS 1.3 servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-24613
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 48.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2020 | 21:06
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

wolfSSL before 4.5.0 mishandles TLS 1.3 server data in the WAIT_CERT_CR state, within SanityCheckTls13MsgReceived() in tls13.c. This is an incorrect implementation of the TLS 1.3 client state machine. This allows attackers in a privileged network position to completely impersonate any TLS 1.3 servers, and read or modify potentially sensitive information between clients using the wolfSSL library and these TLS servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2800
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-19.07% / 95.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A specially crafted x509 certificate can cause a single out of bounds byte overwrite in wolfSSL through 3.10.2 resulting in potential certificate validation vulnerabilities, denial of service and possible remote code execution. In order to trigger this vulnerability, the attacker needs to supply a malicious x509 certificate to either a server or a client application using this library.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfsslwolfSSL
Product-wolfsslwolfSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-25638
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 19.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 01:06
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfssln/a
Product-wolfssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-3724
Matching Score-6
Assigner-wolfSSL Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-wolfSSL Inc.
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.10% / 27.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2023 | 21:13
Updated-29 Oct, 2024 | 15:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
TLS 1.3 client issue handling malicious server when not including a KSE and PSK extension

If a TLS 1.3 client gets neither a PSK (pre shared key) extension nor a KSE (key share extension) when connecting to a malicious server, a default predictable buffer gets used for the IKM (Input Keying Material) value when generating the session master secret. Using a potentially known IKM value when generating the session master secret key compromises the key generated, allowing an eavesdropper to reconstruct it and potentially allowing access to or meddling with message contents in the session. This issue does not affect client validation of connected servers, nor expose private key information, but could result in an insecure TLS 1.3 session when not controlling both sides of the connection. wolfSSL recommends that TLS 1.3 client side users update the version of wolfSSL used. 

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wolfsslwolfSSL
Product-wolfsslwolfSSL
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2014-7143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.35% / 56.81%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2019 | 13:04
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 18:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Python Twisted 14.0 trustRoot is not respected in HTTP client

Action-Not Available
Vendor-twistedn/a
Product-twistedn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1514
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Hitachi Energy
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.07% / 21.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2023 | 14:22
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 05:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Hitachi Energy Ltd.
Product-rtu500_scripting_interfaceRTU500 Scripting Interface
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-6517
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to version 0.3.0, chloride's use of net-ssh resulted in host fingerprints for previously unknown hosts getting added to the user's known_hosts file without confirmation. In version 0.3.0 this is updated so that the user's known_hosts file is not updated by chloride.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-chlorideChloride
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1409
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MongoDB, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 46.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2023 | 15:21
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate validation issue in MongoDB Server running on Windows or macOS

If the MongoDB Server running on Windows or macOS is configured to use TLS with a specific set of configuration options that are already known to work securely in other platforms (e.g. Linux), it is possible that client certificate validation may not be in effect, potentially allowing client to establish a TLS connection with the server that supplies any certificate. This issue affect all MongoDB Server v6.3 versions, MongoDB Server v5.0 versions v5.0.0 to v5.0.14 and all MongoDB Server v4.4 versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationMongoDB, Inc.Apple Inc.
Product-windowsmongodbmacosMongoDB Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Shoplat App for iOS 1.10.00 through 1.18.00 does not properly verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-docomon/a
Product-shoplatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3046
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Sep, 2009 | 17:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Opera before 10.00 does not check all intermediate X.509 certificates for revocation, which makes it easier for remote SSL servers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a revoked certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpera
Product-opera_browsern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4436
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2019 | 17:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed in configuration profiles. This was addressed with additional checks. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 12.1.1, tvOS 12.1.1, watchOS 5.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosiOS, tvOS, watchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45391
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 7.88%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.143 and earlier globally and unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for the entire Jenkins controller JVM.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-ns-nd_integration_performance_publisherJenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0534
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.95% / 75.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2015 | 10:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-J before 6.2, RSA BSAFE SSL-J before 6.2, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier do not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate's unsigned portion, a similar issue to CVE-2014-8275.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_ssl-cbsafebsafe_ssl-jn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-36377
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2021 | 12:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Fossil before 2.14.2 and 2.15.x before 2.15.2 often skips the hostname check during TLS certificate validation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-fossil-scmn/aFedora Project
Product-fossilfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 76.16%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-09 Nov, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software distribution, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary web sites or software publishers for several years, even if the HeadSetup product is uninstalled. NOTE: a vulnerability-assessment approach must check all Windows systems for CA certificates with a CN of 127.0.0.1 or SennComRootCA, and determine whether those certificates are unwanted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sennheisern/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1headsetupwindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10windows_server_2019windows_server_2008n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-47700
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 8.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Feb, 2024 | 16:20
Updated-22 Aug, 2024 | 13:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Storage Virtualize improper certificate validation

IBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM FlashSystem and IBM Storage Virtualize 8.6 products could allow a remote attacker to spoof a trusted system that would not be correctly validated by the Storwize server. This could lead to a user connecting to a malicious host, believing that it was a trusted system and deceived into accepting spoofed data. IBM X-Force ID: 271016.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-storage_virtualizeStorage Virtualize
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12608
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Docker Moby before 17.06.0. The Docker engine validated a client TLS certificate using both the configured client CA root certificate and all system roots on non-Windows systems. This allowed a client with any domain validated certificate signed by a system-trusted root CA (as opposed to one signed by the configured CA root certificate) to authenticate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mobyprojectn/a
Product-mobyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2022 | 16:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.3 does not properly ensure that a certificate is actually associated with the host due to improper validation of certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 201104.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-sterling_secure_proxysecure_external_authentication_serverSterling Secure ProxySecure External Authentication Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15604
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Sep, 2020 | 01:50
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CWE-494: Update files are not properly verified.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationTrend Micro Incorporated
Product-internet_security_2019officescan_cloudmaximum_security_2019premium_security_2019windowsantivirus\+_2019Trend Micro Security (Consumer)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-494
Download of Code Without Integrity Check
CVE-2021-29653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-15732
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Bitdefender
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 24.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2021 | 14:50
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 01:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the Online Threat Prevention module as used in Bitdefender Total Security allows an attacker to potentially bypass HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) checks. This issue affects: Bitdefender Total Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Internet Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Antivirus Plus versions prior to 25.0.7.29.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Bitdefender
Product-internet_securitytotal_securityantivirus_plusAntivirus PlusInternet SecurityTotal Security
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-0294
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.58% / 68.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 15:12
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

GnuTLS before 3.3.13 does not validate that the signature algorithms match when importing a certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GnuTLSRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxGNU
Product-debian_linuxgnutlsenterprise_linuxGnuTLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29495
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.35%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-07 May, 2021 | 15:15
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 22:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Nim stdlib httpClient does not validate peer certificates by default

Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. In Nim standard library before 1.4.2, httpClient SSL/TLS certificate verification was disabled by default. Users can upgrade to version 1.4.2 to receive a patch or, as a workaround, set "verifyMode = CVerifyPeer" as documented.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nim-langnim-lang
Product-nimsecurity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27018
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 27.30%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Aug, 2021 | 17:56
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The mechanism which performs certificate validation was discovered to have a flaw that resulted in certificates signed by an internal certificate authority to not be properly validated. This issue only affects clients that are configured to utilize Tenable.sc as the vulnerability data source.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aPerforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-remediatePuppet Remediate
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 16:43
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Double Certificate Attack

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to combine multiple certificate data, which when opened caused LibreOffice to display a validly signed indicator but whose content was unrelated to the signature shown. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25634
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2021 | 13:33
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 00:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 27.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Revocation Check failure

Fixed issues with NetIQ eDirectory prior to 9.1.1 when checking certificate revocation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-netiqNetIQ
Product-edirectoryeDirectory
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000520
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 28.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 12:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

ARM mbedTLS version 2.7.0 and earlier contains a Ciphersuite Allows Incorrectly Signed Certificates vulnerability in mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() that can result in ECDSA-signed certificates are accepted, when only RSA-signed ones should be.. This attack appear to be exploitable via Peers negotiate a TLS-ECDH-RSA-* ciphersuite. Any of the peers can then provide an ECDSA-signed certificate, when only an RSA-signed one should be accepted..

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44532
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 27.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clustermysql_enterprise_monitormysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-27820
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.04% / 12.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2025 | 11:44
Updated-04 Jun, 2025 | 11:20
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache HttpComponents: PSL (Public Suffix List) validation bypass

A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apache HttpClient team. Fixed in the 5.4.3 release

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-Apache HttpComponents
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22939
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Siemens AGDebian GNU/Linux
Product-sinec_infrastructure_network_servicespeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clusternextgen_apijd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsnode.jsNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 76.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Apr, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-firepower_threat_defenseadaptive_security_appliance_softwareCisco Adaptive Security Appliance
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-45197
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 23.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Dec, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-14 Apr, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-slixmpp_projectn/a
Product-slixmppn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1276
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 19:56
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Data Center Network Manager Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted host or construct a man-in-the-middle attack to extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient certificate validation when establishing HTTPS requests with the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-data_center_network_managerCisco Data Center Network Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6664
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 50.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Aug, 2017 | 06:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the Autonomic Networking feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote, autonomic node to access the Autonomic Networking infrastructure of an affected system, after the certificate for the autonomic node has been revoked. This vulnerability affected devices that are running Release 16.x of Cisco IOS XE Software and are configured to use Autonomic Networking. This vulnerability does not affect devices that are running an earlier release of Cisco IOS XE Software or devices that are not configured to use Autonomic Networking. More Information: CSCvd22328. Known Affected Releases: 15.5(1)S3.1 Denali-16.2.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-ios_xeCisco IOS XE
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1277
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Jan, 2021 | 19:56
Updated-12 Nov, 2024 | 20:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Data Center Network Manager Certificate Validation Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted host or construct a man-in-the-middle attack to extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient certificate validation when establishing HTTPS requests with the affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-data_center_network_managerCisco Data Center Network Manager
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7192
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 45.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

WebSocket.swift in Starscream before 2.0.4 allows an SSL Pinning bypass because of incorrect management of the certValidated variable (it can be set to true but cannot be set to false).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-starscream_projectn/a
Product-starscreamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7468
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.70% / 71.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In curl and libcurl 7.52.0 to and including 7.53.1, libcurl would attempt to resume a TLS session even if the client certificate had changed. That is unacceptable since a server by specification is allowed to skip the client certificate check on resume, and may instead use the old identity which was established by the previous certificate (or no certificate). libcurl supports by default the use of TLS session id/ticket to resume previous TLS sessions to speed up subsequent TLS handshakes. They are used when for any reason an existing TLS connection couldn't be kept alive to make the next handshake faster. This flaw is a regression and identical to CVE-2016-5419 reported on August 3rd 2016, but affecting a different version range.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]CURL
Product-libcurlcurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

iSmartAlarm cube devices have an SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ismartalarmn/a
Product-cubeone_firmwarecubeonen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-0264
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Dec, 2019 | 21:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 14:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An import error was introduced in Cumin in the code refactoring in r5310. Server certificate validation is always disabled when connecting to Aviary servers, even if the installed packages on a system support it.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cuminRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mrg_management_consolecumin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-5518
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Nov, 2019 | 13:06
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

vdsm: certificate generation upon node creation allowing vdsm to start and serve requests from anyone who has a matching key (and certificate)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ovirtvdsm
Product-vdsmvdsm
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found