IBM WebSphere Portal 8.5 and 9.0 exposes backend server URLs that are configured for usage by the Web Application Bridge component. IBM X-Force ID: 127476.
IBM Security Identity Governance Virtual Appliance 5.2 through 5.2.3.2 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 127396.
IBM Security Identity Governance Virtual Appliance 5.2 through 5.2.3.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 127399.
IBM Security Identity Governance Virtual Appliance 5.2 through 5.2.3.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 126859.
IBM OpenPages GRC Platform 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to obtain sensitive information about the server that could be used in future attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 126241.
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager 6.2 is affected by a vulnerability due to a missing secure attribute in encrypted session (SSL) cookie. IBM X-Force ID: 125731.
IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by improper handling of requests to the Developer Portal. IBM X-Force ID: 127002.
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.5 and 7.6 generates error messages that could reveal sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 125153.
IBM Daeja ViewONE Professional, Standard & Virtual 4.1.5.1 and 5.0.2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject data into log files made to look legitimate. IBM X-Force ID: 123850.
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) uses insufficiently random numbers or values in a security context that depends on unpredictable numbers. This weakness may allow attackers to expose sensitive information by guessing tokens or identifiers. IBM X-Force ID: 123909.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 123860.
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 123903.
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5) stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 123904.
IBM BigFix Compliance (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) 1.9.70 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 123671.
IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 could reveal sensitive information in HTTP 500 Internal Server Error responses. IBM X-Force ID: 124357.
IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 123673.
IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties. IBM X-Force ID: 124746.
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747.
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739.
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix 9.2 and 9.5) does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 123861.
IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 123429.
IBM OpenPages GRC Platform 7.2 and 7.3 with OpenPages Loss Event Entry (LEE) application could allow a user to obtain sensitive information including private APIs that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 122201.
IBM QRadar 7.2 and 7.3 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 122957.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker (IBM Integration Bus 9.0 and 10.0) could allow an unauthorized user to obtain sensitive information about software versions that could lead to further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 121341.
IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 3.2.0 and 3.3.01 before 3.3.01.23 Interim Fix 1, 3.4.0 before 3.4.0.6 Interim Fix 1, and 3.4.1 before 3.4.1.7 provides web-server version data in (1) an unspecified page title and (2) an unspecified HTTP header field, which allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information by reading a version string.
Directory traversal vulnerability in LayerLoader.jsp in the theme component in IBM WebSphere Portal 7.0.0.1 and 7.0.0.2 before CF19 and 8.0 before CF03 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted URI.
content.php in WSPortal 1.0, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a "';" (quote semicolon) sequence in the page parameter, which reveals the installation path in the resulting forced SQL error message.
IBM Security Access Manager for Web 7.0 before 7.0.0 IF21, 8.0 before 8.0.1.3 IF4, and 9.0 before 9.0.0.1 IF1 does not have a lockout mechanism for invalid login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack.
The portal in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience before 8.7.1.8814, 8.8 before 8.8.0.9026, 9.0.0, 9.0.0A, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1083, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5073, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1095, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5144 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary charts by specifying an internal chart name.
The SSH implementation on IBM Security Access Manager for Web appliances 7.0 before 7.0.0 FP19, 8.0 before 8.0.1.3 IF3, and 9.0 before 9.0.0.0 IF1 does not properly restrict the set of MAC algorithms, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors.
Unspecified vulnerability in the IBM Maximo Anywhere application 7.5.1 through 7.5.1.2 for Android allows attackers to bypass a passcode protection mechanism and obtain sensitive information via a crafted application.
The IMM2 First Failure Data Capture function collects management module logs and diagnostic information when a hardware error is detected. This information is made available for download through an SFTP server hosted on the IMM2 management network interface. In versions earlier than 4.90 for Lenovo System x and earlier than 6.80 for IBM System x, the credentials to access the SFTP server are hard-coded and described in the IMM2 documentation, allowing an attacker with management network access to obtain the collected FFDC data. After applying the update, the IMM2 will create random SFTP credentials for use with OneCLI.
The Servlet Engine and Web Container in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) before 6.0.2.17, when ibm-web-ext.xmi sets fileServingEnabled to true and servlet caching is enabled, allows remote attackers to obtain JSP source code and other sensitive information via "specific requests."
Directory traversal vulnerability in Redirect.bat in IBM Director before 5.10 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) sequence in the file parameter.
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere Application Server before 6.0.2.13 have unspecified vectors and impact, including (1) an "authority problem" in ThreadIdentitySupport as identified by PK25199, and "Potential security exposure" issues as identified by (2) PK22747, (3) PK24334, (4) PK25740, and (5) PK26123.
IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) "Save As Draft" option is used or (2) a "," (comma) is inside the "phrase" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.
Unspecified vulnerability in WebSphere 5.1.1 (or any earlier cumulative fix) Common Configuration Mode + CommonArchive and J2EE Models might allow attackers to obtain sensitive information via the trace.
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.x before 7.0.0.35, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.10, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.3 does not properly restrict resource access, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
Directory traversal vulnerability in pkmslogout in Tivoli Web Server Plug-in 5.1.0.10 in Tivoli Access Manager (TAM) 5.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the filename parameter.
IBM Intelligent Operations Center (IOC) 5.1.0 through 5.2.0 is vulnerable to user enumeration, allowing an attacker to brute force into the system. IBM X-Force ID: 157013.
The (1) webreports, (2) post/create-role, and (3) post/update-role programs in IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (TEM) before 8.2 do not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for a cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie.
IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.x through 7.1.2.7 and 8.x through 8.0.0.3 allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via a request to a (1) snoop, (2) hello, (3) ivt/, (4) hitcount, (5) HitCount.jsp, (6) HelloHTMLError.jsp, (7) HelloHTML.jsp, (8) HelloVXMLError.jsp, (9) HelloVXML.jsp, (10) HelloWMLError.jsp, (11) HelloWML.jsp, or (12) cqweb/j_security_check sample script.
The web-server component in the Consolidation and Analysis Engine (CAE) Server in DB2 Query Monitor in IBM DB2 Tools 2.3.0 for z/OS does not prevent directory browsing, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via HTTP requests.
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 5.0.2.5 through 5.1.1.3 allows remote attackers to obtain JSP source code and other sensitive information, related to incorrect request processing by the web container.
The login page of IDSWebApp in the Web Administration Tool in IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) 6.2 before 6.2.0.3-TIV-ITDS-IF0004 does not have an off autocomplete attribute for authentication fields, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access by leveraging an unattended workstation.
IBM Rational Build Forge 7.1.0 uses the HTTP GET method during redirection from the authentication servlet to a PHP script, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to discover session IDs by reading (1) web-server access logs, (2) web-server Referer logs, or (3) the browser history.
The Web Client Service in IBM Datacap Taskmaster Capture 8.0.1 before FP1 requires a cleartext password, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors.
IDSWebApp in the Web Administration Tool in IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) 6.2 before 6.2.0.3-TIV-ITDS-IF0004 does not require authentication for access to LDAP Server log files, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted URL.
The web interface for Lotus Notes mail automatically processes HTML in an attachment without prompting the user to save or open it, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct web-based attacks and steal cookies.