TestLink v1.9.20 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /lib/plan/planView.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified services in IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC) 4.x before 4.0.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify work items.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 6.2 through 7.5, as used in SmartCloud Control Desk, Tivoli Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, Maximo Service Desk, and Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB), allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

The Crypto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.15. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'crypto_connect_ajax_process::check' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Symantec Messaging Gateway (SMG) before 10.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

Yuba u5cms v8.3.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component savepage.php. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Jorani v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /application/controllers/Users.php.

The Corner Ad plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.56. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on its corner_ad_settings_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger the deletion of ads via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The AMP for WP – Accelerated Mobile Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.99.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'proxy' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send the logged in user's cookies to their own server via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Dell EMC Data Protection Central versions 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 19.5, 19.6, contain(s) a Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability. A(n) remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to processing of unintended server operations.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stoneware webNetwork before 6.0.8.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that modify user accounts.

FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /system/site/config_footer_updagte.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in W3 Eden Download Manager plugin <= 3.2.48 at WordPress.

An issue was discovered in WeaselCMS v0.3.5. CSRF can create new pages via an index.php?b=pages&a=new URI.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Convertigo Mobile Platform Plugin 1.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index/manager/fileUpload in Public Knowledge Project Open Harvester Systems 2.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload PHP files.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in diafan.CMS before 5.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify articles via a save_post action to admin/news/saveNEWS_ID/, (2) modify settings via a save_post action to admin/site/save2/, or (3) modify credentials via a save_post action to admin/usersite/save2/.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that have unspecified impact via vectors related to the HTTP GET method.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martyn Chamberlin Don't Muck My Markup.This issue affects Don't Muck My Markup: from n/a through 1.8.

FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component system/site/webconfig_updagte.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pages.php in Wikipad 1.6.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify pages via the data[text] parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Auto-Exchanger 5.1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change a password via a request to signup.php.

IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager 7.2.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 11029.

IBM CICS TX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 229331.

A carefully crafted invocation on the Image plugin could trigger an CSRF vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki before 2.11.3, which could allow a group privilege escalation of the attacker's account. Further examination of this issue established that it could also be used to modify the email associated with the attacked account, and then a reset password request from the login page.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /ctrl in the web interface in HomeSeer HS2 2.5.0.20 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that execute arbitrary programs.

Missing protections against Cross-Site Request Forgery in the web application in ZyXEL NSA325 V2 version 4.81 allow attackers to perform state-changing actions via crafted HTTP forms.

Trash Bin plugin 1.1.3 for MyBB has cross-site scripting (XSS) via a thread subject and a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via a post subject.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lifecycle Query Engine (LQE) in IBM Jazz Reporting Service (JRS) 6.0 before 6.0.0-Rational-CLM-ifix005 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

The CSRF protection mechanism in Django through 1.2.7 and 1.3.x through 1.3.1 does not properly handle web-server configurations supporting arbitrary HTTP Host headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger unauthenticated forged requests via vectors involving a DNS CNAME record and a web page containing JavaScript code.

There is a CSRF vulnerability on Netman-204 version 02.05. An attacker could manage to change administrator passwords through a Cross Site Request Forgery due to the lack of proper validation on the CRSF token. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to access the administrator panel, being able to modify different parameters that are critical for industrial operations.

In ClickHouse before 1.1.54388, "remote" table function allowed arbitrary symbols in "user", "password" and "default_database" fields which led to Cross Protocol Request Forgery Attacks.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget) plugin <= 1.8.4 versions.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 10.8.7, 11.0.x before 11.0.5, and 11.1.x before 11.1.2. CSRF can occur in the Test feature of the System Hooks component.

Unisys Data Exchange Management Studio before 6.0.IC2 and 7.x before 7.0.IC1 doesn't have an Anti-CSRF token to authenticate the POST request. Thus, a cross-site request forgery attack could occur.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in global.php in MyBB before 1.6.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of a user for requests that change the user's language via the language parameter.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in xt:Commerce 3.0.4 SP2.1 and possibly earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of Admins for requests that (1) set a New user to Admin via the cID parameter to a statusconfirm action in admin/customers.php and (2) grant permissions to users via the cID parameter to a save action in admin/accounting.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in mod/wiki/ components in Moodle 2.0.x before 2.0.5 and 2.1.x before 2.1.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify wiki data.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ajax.php in Cerb before 7.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrator account via a saveWorkerPeek action.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) 2.x before 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators or moderators via vectors involving image files, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-3615. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SKYARC MTCMS before 5.252, and the MultiFileUploader 0.44 and earlier, DuplicateEntry 1.2 and earlier, MailPack 1.741 and earlier, and AutoTagging 0.08 and earlier plugins for Movable Type, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that modify data.

Certain switch models from PLANET Technology have a web application that is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated remote attacker can trick a user into visiting a malicious website, allowing the attacker to impersonate the user and perform actions on their behalf, such as creating accounts.

The PropertyHive plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save_account_details' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit the name, email address, and password of an administrator account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Moodle 2.0.x before 2.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that mark the completion of (1) an activity or (2) a course.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Moodle 1.9.x before 1.9.11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that modify an RSS feed in an RSS block.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailerLite – Signup forms (official) plugin <= 1.5.7 at WordPress allows an attacker to change the API key.

IBM Application Performance Management - Response Time Monitoring Agent (IBM Monitoring 8.1.4) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 139598.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Support Incident Tracker (aka SiT!) 3.65 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of user for requests that delete a user via user_delete.php and other unspecified programs.

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 140761.

An issue was discovered in EMLsoft 5.4.5. The eml/upload/eml/?action=user&do=add page allows CSRF.