Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Disable Comments plugin before 1.0.4 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that enable comments via a request to the disable_comments_settings page to wp-admin/options-general.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Monchito.Net WP Emoji One plugin <= 0.6.0 versions.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue in Server Console in CloverDX through 5.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute any action as the logged-in user (including script execution). The issue is resolved in CloverDX 5.10, CloverDX 5.9.1, CloverDX 5.8.2, and CloverDX 5.7.1.

TuziCMS 2.0.6 has index.php/manage/link/do_add CSRF.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ZZCMS v.2023 and earlier allows a remote attacker to gain privileges via the add function in adminlist.php.

A vulnerability was determined in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Media Library Helper plugin <= 1.2.0 versions.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Rukovoditel v2.8.3 allows attackers to create an admin user with an arbitrary credentials.

DMA Softlab Radius Manager 4.4.0 allows CSRF with impacts such as adding new manager accounts via admin.php.

The NewsBlogger theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 0.2.5.6 to 0.2.6.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the newsblogger_install_and_activate_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files and achieve remote code execution via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This is due to a reverted fix of CVE-2025-1305.

IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics 4.1.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 202168.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Ubiquiti Networks UniFi Controller before 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create a new admin user via a request to api/add/admin; (2) have unspecified impact via a request to api/add/wlanconf; change the guest (3) password, (4) authentication method, or (5) restricted subnets via a request to api/set/setting/guest_access; (6) block, (7) unblock, or (8) reconnect users by MAC address via a request to api/cmd/stamgr; change the syslog (9) server or (10) port via a request to api/set/setting/rsyslogd; (11) have unspecified impact via a request to api/set/setting/smtp; change the syslog (12) server, (13) port, or (14) authentication settings via a request to api/cmd/cfgmgr; or (15) change the Unifi Controller name via a request to api/set/setting/identity.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 and 11.2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in the My Inbox page which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 202167.

The NewsBlogger theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the newsblogger_install_and_activate_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files and achieve remote code execution via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 207123.

The Translate WordPress with GTranslate WordPress plugin before 2.9.9 does not have CSRF check in some files, and write debug data such as user's cookies in a publicly accessible file if a specific parameter is used when requesting them. Combining those two issues, an attacker could gain access to a logged in admin cookies by making them open a malicious link or page

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC Documentum WDK before 6.7SP1 P28 and 6.7SP2 before P15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in (1) CustomerPreferences.pm, (2) CustomerTicketMessage.pm, (3) CustomerTicketProcess.pm, and (4) CustomerTicketZoom.pm in Kernel/Modules/ in Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) 3.1.x before 3.1.19, 3.2.x before 3.2.14, and 3.3.x before 3.3.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (5) create tickets or (6) send follow-ups to existing tickets.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Deepak Anand WP Dummy Content Generator plugin <= 2.3.0 versions.

Certain Papoo products are affected by: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the admin interface. This affects Papoo CMS Light through 21.02 and Papoo CMS Pro through 6.0.1. The impact is: gain privileges (remote).

The E Unlocked - Student Result WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 is lacking CSRF and validation when uploading the School logo, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin upload arbitrary files, such as PHP via a CSRF attack

CODESYS Automation Server before 1.16.0 allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

The Newscrunch theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the newscrunch_install_and_activate_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kemal YAZICI - PluginPress Shortcode IMDB plugin <= 6.0.8 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OptiMonk OptiMonk: Popups, Personalization & A/B Testing plugin <= 2.0.4 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the terms of use page in Liferay Portal before 7.3.6, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 1, 7.2 before fix pack 11 allows remote attackers to accept the site's terms of use via social engineering and enticing the user to visit a malicious page.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the GD Star Rating plugin 19.22 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct (1) SQL injection attacks via the s parameter in the gd-star-rating-stats page to wp-admin/admin.php or (2) cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via unspecified vectors.

The User Generator and Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the "Import Using CSV File" function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate user privileges by creating arbitrary accounts with administrator privileges via a forged request, provided they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

There is CSRF in Serendipity 2.0.5, allowing attackers to install any themes via a GET request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saas Disabler allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Disabler: from n/a through 3.0.3.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.5, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186283.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative web interface in the Cisco RV router firmware on RV220W devices, before 1.0.5.9 on RV120W devices, and before 1.0.4.14 on RV180 and RV180W devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators, aka Bug ID CSCuh87145.

IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.11 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191942.

Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management Center, version 9.32. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow a Cross-Site Forgery attack.

IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.17 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 175410.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin UI in Papercut MF and NG before 14.1 (Build 26983) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a form to create a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

HID OMNIKEY 5427 and OMNIKEY 5127 readers are vulnerable to CSRF when using the EEM driver (Ethernet Emulation Mode). By persuading an authenticated user to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could send a malformed HTTP request to upload a configuration file to the device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform cross-site scripting attacks, Web cache poisoning, and other malicious activities.

The Radio Buttons for Taxonomies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_single_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save terms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Command School Student Management System 1.06.01 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of (1) administrators for requests that change the administrator password via an update action to sw/admin_change_password.php or (2) unspecified victims for requests that add a topic or blog entry to sw/add_topic.php. NOTE: vector 2 can be leveraged to bypass the authentication requirements for exploiting vector 1 in CVE-2014-1914.

All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits forms to create a new user with global administrative privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arbitrary file uploads by leveraging the extension upload functionality without additional validation.

Systemic Lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Token Implementation.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 .

An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint).

The Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.57. This is due to confusing logic functions missing or having incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain and perform otherwise unauthorized access and actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

ToMAX R60G R60GV2-V2.0-v.2.6.3-170330 devices do not have any protection against a CSRF attack.

Microsoft Project Server and Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 allow an attacker to use cross-site forgery to read content that they are not authorized to read, use the victim's identity to take actions on the web application on behalf of the victim, such as change permissions and delete content, and inject malicious content in the browser of the victim, aka "Microsoft Project Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability".

The ultimate-category-excluder plugin before 1.2 for WordPress allows ultimate-category-excluder.php CSRF.

The Bread & Butter: Gate content + Capture leads + Collect first-party data + Nurture with Ai agents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.10.1321. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uploadImage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files that make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.