snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

LogRhythm Platform Manager (PM) 7.4.9 allows CSRF. The Web interface is vulnerable to Cross-site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWH). If a logged-in PM user visits a malicious site in the same browser session, that site can perform a CSRF attack to create a WebSocket from the victim client to the vulnerable PM server. Once the socket is created, the malicious site can interact with the vulnerable web server in the context of the logged-in user. This can include WebSocket payloads that result in command execution.

A vulnerability has been found in Guangdong Pythagorean OA Office System up to 4.50.31 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /note/index/delete. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230458 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apa Apa Banner Slider allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Apa Banner Slider: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RSS module in vtiger CRM 5.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of Admin users for requests that modify the news feed system via the rssurl parameter in a Save action to index.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the User Protect module 5.x before 5.x-1.4 and 6.x before 6.x-1.3, a module for Drupal, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete the editing protection of a user or (2) delete a certain type of administrative-bypass rule.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infomaniak Staff VOD Infomaniak allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VOD Infomaniak: from n/a through 1.5.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPWeb Social Auto Poster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Social Auto Poster: from n/a through 5.3.15.

ECOA BAS controller has a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability, thus authenticated attacker can remotely place a forged request at a malicious web page and execute CRUD commands (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to perform arbitrary operations in the system.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhileTrue Most And Least Read Posts Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Most And Least Read Posts Widget: from n/a through 2.5.18.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Quick.Cart 3.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of the administrator for requests that (1) delete orders via an orders-delete action to admin.php, and possibly (2) delete products or (3) delete pages via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin Gibson IdeaPush allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects IdeaPush: from n/a through 8.69.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gora Tech LLC Cooked Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cooked Pro: from n/a before 1.8.0.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Your_account module in CMSphp 0.21 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change an administrator password via the pseudo, pwd, and uid parameters in an admin_info_user_verif action.

calibre-web is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Kandidat CMS 1.4.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify settings via a validate action to admin/settings.php, (2) modify pages via the what parameter to admin/edit.php, or (3) modify articles via the edit parameter to admin/news.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Cargo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mediawiki - Cargo: from 3.6.X before 3.6.1.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress before 4.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors involving a Flash file upload.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Group Permissions module in CMS Made Simple 1.7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make permission modifications.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SquirrelMail 1.4.19 and earlier, and NaSMail before 1.7, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via features such as send message and change preferences, related to (1) functions/mailbox_display.php, (2) src/addrbook_search_html.php, (3) src/addressbook.php, (4) src/compose.php, (5) src/folders.php, (6) src/folders_create.php, (7) src/folders_delete.php, (8) src/folders_rename_do.php, (9) src/folders_rename_getname.php, (10) src/folders_subscribe.php, (11) src/move_messages.php, (12) src/options.php, (13) src/options_highlight.php, (14) src/options_identities.php, (15) src/options_order.php, (16) src/search.php, and (17) src/vcard.php.

A security vulnerability has been detected in birkir prime up to 0.4.0.beta.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

icingaweb2-module-jira provides integration with Atlassian Jira. Starting in version 1.3.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, template and field configuration forms perform the deletion action before user input is validated, including the cross site request forgery token. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2. There are no known workarounds.

Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Several url endpoints are subject to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please refer to the linked GHSA for the complete list. This issue has been addressed in version 3.2.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. More Information: CSCvc91800. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(0) 11.6.

A vulnerability has been found in Koillection up to 1.6.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file assets/controllers/csrf_protection_controller.js. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.7.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 9ab8562d3f1e953da93fed63f9ee802c7ea26a9a. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. The vendor explains: "I ended up switching to a newer CSRF handling using stateless token."

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in EyouCMS 1.3.6 that can add an htm page to execute the js code via login.php?m=admin&c=Filemanager&a=newfile&lang=cn.

OpenRefine is a free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.8.3, lack of cross-site request forgery protection on the `preview-expression` command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code. The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row, and the attacker must convince the victim to open a malicious webpage. Version 3.8.3 fixes the issue.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ben Marshall Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme: from n/a through 4.2.3.

Galette is a membership management web application built for non profit organizations and released under GPLv3. Versions prior to 0.9.6 do not check for Cross Site Request Forgery attacks. All users are advised to upgrade to 0.9.6 as soon as possible. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/delete/123

livehelperchat is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tradebooster Video XML Sitemap Generator.This issue affects Video XML Sitemap Generator: from n/a through 1.0.0.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod/user/act_user.php in Garfield Petshop through 2020-10-01 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple 1.8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reset the administrative password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative console in the Security component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.0.2 before 6.0.2.39, 6.1 before 6.1.0.29, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

The Fancy Product Designer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the FPD_Admin_Import class that makes it possible for attackers to upload malicious files that could be used to gain webshell access to a server in versions up to, and including, 4.7.5.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Suite For Linux (aka ICE-LX) before 2.11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/create_directory

spree_auth_devise is an open source library which provides authentication and authorization services for use with the Spree storefront framework by using an underlying Devise authentication framework. In affected versions spree_auth_devise is subject to a CSRF vulnerability that allows user account takeover. All applications using any version of the frontend component of spree_auth_devise are affected if protect_from_forgery method is both: Executed whether as: A before_action callback (the default). A prepend_before_action (option prepend: true given) before the :load_object hook in Spree::UserController (most likely order to find). Configured to use :null_session or :reset_session strategies (:null_session is the default in case the no strategy is given, but rails --new generated skeleton use :exception). Users are advised to update their spree_auth_devise gem. For users unable to update it may be possible to change your strategy to :exception. Please see the linked GHSA for more workaround details. ### Impact CSRF vulnerability that allows user account takeover. All applications using any version of the frontend component of `spree_auth_devise` are affected if `protect_from_forgery` method is both: * Executed whether as: * A before_action callback (the default) * A prepend_before_action (option prepend: true given) before the :load_object hook in Spree::UserController (most likely order to find). * Configured to use :null_session or :reset_session strategies (:null_session is the default in case the no strategy is given, but rails --new generated skeleton use :exception). That means that applications that haven't been configured differently from what it's generated with Rails aren't affected. Thanks @waiting-for-dev for reporting and providing a patch �� ### Patches Spree 4.3 users should update to spree_auth_devise 4.4.1 Spree 4.2 users should update to spree_auth_devise 4.2.1 ### Workarounds If possible, change your strategy to :exception: ```ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base protect_from_forgery with: :exception end ``` Add the following to`config/application.rb `to at least run the `:exception` strategy on the affected controller: ```ruby config.after_initialize do Spree::UsersController.protect_from_forgery with: :exception end ``` ### References https://github.com/solidusio/solidus_auth_devise/security/advisories/GHSA-xm34-v85h-9pg2

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook Web Access (owa/ev.owa) 2007 through SP2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of e-mail users for requests that perform Outlook requests, as demonstrated by setting the auto-forward rule.

FrogCMS V0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/plugin/file_manager/rename

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dnesscarkey Use Any Font allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Use Any Font: from n/a through 6.3.08.

Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Virtual Appliance (IMSVA) 9.1 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could allow an attacker to modify policy rules by tricking an authenticated administrator into accessing an attacker-controlled web page. An attacker must already have obtained product administrator/root privileges to exploit this vulnerability.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/main/update_user in DiamondList 0.1.6, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site's configuration.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Benic Simple Giveaways – Grow your business, email lists and traffic with contests plugin <= 2.46.0 versions.

DBHcms v1.2.0 has no CSRF protection mechanism,as demonstrated by CSRF for index.php?dbhcms_pid=-70 can add a user.

The KKProgressbar2 Free WordPress plugin through 1.1.4.2 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in authcfg.cgi in Accoria Web Server (aka Rock Web Server) 1.4.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create user accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bingo!CMS 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify configuration or change content via unspecified vectors.

Atlassian JIRA Server before 7.1.9 has CSRF in auditing/settings.