ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /manager/index.php.

kkFileView 4.0 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via controller\OnlinePreviewController.java.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the addCustomThemePluginRepository function in index.php in WonderCMS 3.1.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL to the theme/plugin installer.

iCMS v7.0.16 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at admincp.php.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/index.php.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Data Center Analytics, Analytics probe components), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer detail view, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe components) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.0-00.

The application was vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attacks, allowing the backend server to interact with unexpected endpoints, potentially including internal and local services, leading to attacks in other downstream systems.

A security issue was discovered in Z-BlogPHP <= 1.7.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the zb_users/plugin/UEditor/php/action_crawler.php file allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the source parameter.

A Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Canto Cumulus through 11.1.3 allows attackers to enumerate the internal network, overload network resources, and possibly have unspecified other impact via the server parameter to the /cwc/login login form.

An issue in the website background of taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

Zalando Skipper v0.13.236 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Varun Dubey Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Wbcom Designs - Activity Link Preview For BuddyPress: from n/a through 1.4.4.

A vulnerability was found in donglight bookstore电商书城系统说明 1.0.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function getHtml of the file src/main/java/org/zdd/bookstore/rawl/HttpUtil.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A SSRF vulnerability exists in the downloadimage interface of CRMEB 3.0, which can remotely download arbitrary files on the server and remotely execute arbitrary code.

Unauthenticated server side request forgery in HPE Serviceguard Manager

Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Rank Math SEO plugin <= 1.0.95 at WordPress.

undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.

wkhtmlTOpdf 0.12.6 is vulnerable to SSRF which allows an attacker to get initial access into the target's system by injecting iframe tag with initial asset IP address on it's source. This allows the attacker to takeover the whole infrastructure by accessing their internal assets.

zrlog v3.1.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the downloadUrl parameter.

Halo CMS v1.5.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the template remote download function.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 10.2 through 11.11. Multiple features contained Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities caused by an insufficient validation to prevent DNS rebinding attacks.

Insufficient RegEx in private-ip npm package v1.0.5 and below insufficiently filters reserved IP ranges resulting in indeterminate SSRF. An attacker can perform a large range of requests to ARIN reserved IP ranges, resulting in an indeterminable number of critical attack vectors, allowing remote attackers to request server-side resources or potentially execute arbitrary code through various SSRF techniques.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Montonio Montonio for WooCommerce, Wpopal Wpopal Core Features, AMO for WP – Membership Management ArcStone wp-amo, Long Watch Studio WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management, Squidesma Theme Minifier, Paul Clark Styles styles, Designmodo Inc. WordPress Page Builder – Qards, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) PHPFreeChat, Arun Basil Lal Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS, Team Agence-Press CSS Adder By Agence-Press, Unihost Confirm Data, deano1987 AMP Toolbox amp-toolbox, Arun Basil Lal Admin CSS MU.This issue affects Montonio for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.0.1; Wpopal Core Features: from n/a through 1.5.8; ArcStone: from n/a through 4.6.6; WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.1; WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.4; WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management: from n/a through 1.2.2; Theme Minifier: from n/a through 2.0; Styles: from n/a through 1.2.3; WordPress Page Builder – Qards: from n/a through 1.0.5; PHPFreeChat: from n/a through 0.2.8; Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS: from n/a through 1.4.1; CSS Adder By Agence-Press: from n/a through 1.5.0; Confirm Data: from n/a through 1.0.7; AMP Toolbox: from n/a through 2.1.1; Admin CSS MU: from n/a through 2.6.

Nextcloud Mail is an email application for the nextcloud personal cloud product. Affected versions shipped with a CSS minifier on the path `./vendor/cerdic/css-tidy/css_optimiser.php`. Access to the minifier is unrestricted and access may lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). It is recommendet to upgrade to Mail 1.12.7 or Mail 1.13.6. Users unable to upgrade may manually delete the file located at `./vendor/cerdic/css-tidy/css_optimiser.php`

A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in HPE StoreOnce Software.

Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) are vulnerable to SSRF when proxying HTTP requests between pve(pmg)proxy and pve(pmg)daemon. An attacker with an unprivileged account can craft an HTTP request to achieve SSRF and file disclosure of any files on the server. Also, in Proxmox Mail Gateway, privilege escalation to the root@pam account is possible if the backup feature has ever been used, because backup files such as pmg-backup_YYYY_MM_DD_*.tgz have 0644 permissions and contain an authkey value. This is fixed in pve-http-server 4.1-3.

The iot-manager microservice 1.0.0 in Northern.tech Mender Enterprise before 3.2.2 allows SSRF because the Azure IoT Hub integration provides several SSRF primitives that can execute cross-tenant actions via internal API endpoints.

A remote server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability was discovered in HPE OneView version(s): Prior to 7.0. HPE has provided a software update to resolve this vulnerability in HPE OneView.

Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. The mitigation for CVE-2024-29190 in valid_host() uses socket.gethostbyname(), which is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.3.2.

A vulnerability in which attackers could forge HTTP requests to manipulate the `charm` data directory to access or delete anything on the server. This has been patched and is available in release [v0.12.1](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/releases/tag/v0.12.1). We recommend that all users running self-hosted `charm` instances update immediately. This vulnerability was found in-house and we haven't been notified of any potential exploiters. ### Additional notes * Encrypted user data uploaded to the Charm server is safe as Charm servers cannot decrypt user data. This includes filenames, paths, and all key-value data. * Users running the official Charm [Docker images](https://github.com/charmbracelet/charm/blob/main/docker.md) are at minimal risk because the exploit is limited to the containerized filesystem.

Emby Server before 4.5.0 allows SSRF via the Items/RemoteSearch/Image ImageURL parameter.

Gibbon v3.4.4 and below allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a crafted URL.

Jizhicms v1.9.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via /admin.php/Plugins/update.html.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Azure allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

TAXII libtaxii through 1.1.117, as used in EclecticIQ OpenTAXII through 0.2.0 and other products, allows SSRF via an initial http:// substring to the parse method, even when the no_network setting is used for the XML parser. NOTE: the vendor points out that the parse method "wraps the lxml library" and that this may be an issue to "raise ... to the lxml group.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.862 Application 20.0.2014 allows Server-Side Request Forgery: rfIDEAS V-2023-015.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.862 Application 20.0.2014 allows Server-Side Request Forgery: Elatec V-2023-014.

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 22.0.862 Application 20.0.2014 allows Server-Side Request Forgery: CPA v1 V-2023-009.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in kalcaddle KodExplorer up to 4.51.03. Affected is an unknown function of the file plugins/webodf/app.php. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.52.01 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 5cf233f7556b442100cf67b5e92d57ceabb126c6. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248220.

An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.1.7, 11.2.x before 11.2.4, and 11.3.x before 11.3.1. There is Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via a loopback address to the validate_localhost function in url_blocker.rb.

A vulnerability was found in kalcaddle kodbox up to 1.48. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function cover of the file plugins/fileThumb/app.php. The manipulation of the argument path leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.48.04 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 63a4d5708d210f119c24afd941d01a943e25334c. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-248210 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Novel-plus v3.6.0 was discovered to be vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via user-supplied crafted input.

Solar appScreener through 3.10.4, when a valid license is not present, allows XXE and SSRF attacks via a crafted XML document.

SSRF exists in osTicket before 1.14.3, where an attacker can add malicious file to server or perform port scanning.

The WPB Show Core WordPress plugin through 2.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via the `path` parameter.

When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is disabled

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.