Spadeico is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for MAVCash, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow in which "amount * sellPrice" can be zero, consequently reducing a seller's assets.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PornCoin (PRNC), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ProjectJ, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for loncoin (LON), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the function batchTransfer of WeMediaChain (WMC), an Ethereum token smart contract. An attacker could use it to set any user's balance.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DaddyToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for COBToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Cranoo (CRN), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Trabet_Coin_PreICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ALEX, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BpsToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EliteShipperToken (ESHIP), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Universal Coin (UCOIN), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Good Time Coin (GTY), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Goutex (GTX), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum (SUB), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the "tradeTrap" issue.

The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token (INT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the "tradeTrap" issue.

ATLANT (ATL) is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner.

An integer overflow in the distributeBTR function of a smart contract implementation for Bitcoin Red (BTCR), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows the owner to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a large address[] array, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the "ownerUnderflow" issue.

An integer overflow in the _transfer function of a smart contract implementation for Hexagon (HXG), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets by providing a _to argument in conjunction with a large _value argument, as exploited in the wild in May 2018, aka the "burnOverflow" issue.

An integer overflow in the transferMulti function of a smart contract implementation for Social Chain (SCA), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to accomplish an unauthorized increase of digital assets, aka the "multiOverflow" issue.

go-jose before 1.0.5 suffers from a CBC-HMAC integer overflow on 32-bit architectures. An integer overflow could lead to authentication bypass for CBC-HMAC encrypted ciphertexts on 32-bit architectures.

Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Order (ETH) (Contract Name: BuyToken), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for T-Swap-Token (T-S-T), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for JavaSwapTest (JST), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow.