All versions of Uffizio GPS Tracker may allow an attacker to perform unintended actions on behalf of a user.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified administrative modules in Proofpoint Messaging Security Gateway 6.2.0.263:6.2.0.237 and earlier in Proofpoint Protection Server 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 6.0.2, 6.1.1, and 6.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unknown vectors.

JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach.

An issue was discovered in EJBCA before 6.15.2.6 and 7.x before 7.3.1.2. A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) issue has been found in the CA UI.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter.

The Canon Oce Colorwave 500 4.0.0.0 printer's web application is missing any form of CSRF protections. This is a system-wide issue. An attacker could perform administrative actions by targeting a logged-in administrative user. NOTE: this is fixed in the latest version.

phpMyFAQ before 2.9.11 allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in phpLiteAdmin 1.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that drop database tables via the droptable parameter to phpliteadmin.php.

Batavi before 1.0 has CSRF.

In TYPO3 CMS 9.0.0 through 9.5.16 and 10.0.0 through 10.4.1, it has been discovered that the backend user interface and install tool are vulnerable to a same-site request forgery. A backend user can be tricked into interacting with a malicious resource an attacker previously managed to upload to the web server. Scripts are then executed with the privileges of the victims' user session. In a worst-case scenario, new admin users can be created which can directly be used by an attacker. The vulnerability is basically a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) triggered by a cross-site scripting vulnerability (XSS) - but happens on the same target host - thus, it's actually a same-site request forgery. Malicious payload such as HTML containing JavaScript might be provided by either an authenticated backend user or by a non-authenticated user using a third party extension, e.g. file upload in a contact form with knowing the target location. To be successful, the attacked victim requires an active and valid backend or install tool user session at the time of the attack. This has been fixed in 9.5.17 and 10.4.2. The deployment of additional mitigation techniques is suggested as described below. - Sudo Mode Extension This TYPO3 extension intercepts modifications to security relevant database tables, e.g. those storing user accounts or storages of the file abstraction layer. Modifications need to confirmed again by the acting user providing their password again. This technique is known as sudo mode. This way, unintended actions happening in the background can be mitigated. - https://github.com/FriendsOfTYPO3/sudo-mode - https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/sudo_mode - Content Security Policy Content Security Policies tell (modern) browsers how resources served a particular site are handled. It is also possible to disallow script executions for specific locations. In a TYPO3 context, it is suggested to disallow direct script execution at least for locations /fileadmin/ and /uploads/.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/conf_users_edit.php in PHP Link Directory (phpLD) 4.1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrator via the N action.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList before 2.10.13 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) edit administrator accounts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in adduser.do in Symantec LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA) before 2.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts, and possibly have unspecified other impact, via the userRole parameter.

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the communication API. The issue lies in the handling of the ConvertToPDF command, which allows an arbitrary file write with attacker controlled data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9829.

LibreHealth EMR v2.0.0 is affected by systemic CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText ECM (formerly Livelink ECM) 9.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change folder and resource permissions.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin/update_user in Hulihan Amethyst 0.1.5, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site's configuration.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder 10.5(1) and 10.5(1a) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuv26501.

A CSRF issue in vtecrm vtenext 19 CE allows attackers to carry out unwanted actions on an administrator's behalf, such as uploading files, adding users, and deleting accounts.

In Apache Airflow 1.8.2 and earlier, a CSRF vulnerability allowed for a remote command injection on a default install of Airflow.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox before 3.5.17 and 3.6.x before 3.6.14, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.12, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that were initiated by a plugin and received a 307 redirect to a page on a different web site.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Web Interface in the Endpoint Protection Manager in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) 11.0.600x through 11.0.6300 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.

CSRF in admin/manage-settings.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to change the global settings, potentially gaining code execution or causing a denial of service, via a crafted request.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration page in the Recaptcha (aka WP-reCAPTCHA) plugin 2.9.8.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable the CAPTCHA requirement or insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) recaptcha_opt_pubkey, (2) recaptcha_opt_privkey, (3) re_tabindex, (4) error_blank, (5) error_incorrect, (6) mailhide_pub, (7) mailhide_priv, (8) mh_replace_link, or (9) mh_replace_title parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) before 2.0+rc3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that send email via an OMP request to OpenVAS Manager. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged to bypass authentication requirements for exploiting CVE-2011-0018.

Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in XZERES 442SR OS on 442SR wind turbines allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that modify the default user's password via a GET request.

The Security/changepassword URL action in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.10 and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 passes a token as a GET parameter while changing a password through email, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive data and hijack the session via the HTTP referer logs on a server, aka "HTTP referer leakage."

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Power Manager (HPPM) 4.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new administrative accounts.

An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.16. Missing token checks in the image actions of com_templates lead to CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VaM Shop 1.6, 1.6.1, and probably earlier versions allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change user status via admin/customers.php or (2) change user permissions via admin/accounting.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.9 and 2.4.x before 2.4.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via destructive controller actions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-5087.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 8.0, 8.0.1, 9.0, and 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Kandidat CMS 1.4.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify settings via a validate action to admin/settings.php, (2) modify pages via the what parameter to admin/edit.php, or (3) modify articles via the edit parameter to admin/news.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin.php in Collabtive 0.6.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add administrative users via the edituser action.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Bugzilla before 3.2.10, 3.4.x before 3.4.10, 3.6.x before 3.6.4, and 4.0.x before 4.0rc2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests related to (1) adding a saved search in buglist.cgi, (2) voting in votes.cgi, (3) sanity checking in sanitycheck.cgi, (4) creating or editing a chart in chart.cgi, (5) column changing in colchange.cgi, and (6) adding, deleting, or approving a quip in quips.cgi.

Untis WebUntis before 2020.9.6 allows CSRF for certain combinations of rights and modules.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Users module in Zikula before 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change account privileges via an edit access_permissions action to index.php.

IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager Virtual Appliance 2.2.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 144348.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in BEdita before 3.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create categories via a data array to news/saveCategories or (2) modify credentials via a data array to admin/saveUser.

Ruby on Rails 2.1.x, 2.2.x, and 2.3.x before 2.3.11, and 3.x before 3.0.4, does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged (1) AJAX or (2) API requests that leverage "combinations of browser plugins and HTTP redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0696.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in MemHT Portal 4.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify settings via a configuration action to admin.php, (2) modify articles via an articles action to admin.php, or (3) modify credentials via a users action to admin.php.

The sitepress-multilingual-cms (WPML) plugin before 4.3.7-b.2 for WordPress has CSRF due to a loose comparison. This leads to remote code execution in includes/class-wp-installer.php via a series of requests that leverage unintended comparisons of integers to strings.

GeniXCMS 1.1.7 is vulnerable to user privilege escalation due to broken access control. This issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-2680, in which "token" is used as a CSRF protection mechanism, but without validation that "token" is associated with an administrative user.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WebGUI before 7.7.14 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for unspecified requests via unknown vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control for Linux before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

/LoadFrame in Zoho ManageEngine AD Manager Plus build 6590 - 6613 allows attackers to conduct URL Redirection attacks via the src parameter, resulting in a bypass of CSRF protection, or potentially masquerading a malicious URL as trusted.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Views UI implementation in the Views module 5.x before 5.x-1.8 and 6.x before 6.x-2.11 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable all Views or (2) disable all Views.

Multi modules of MailSherlock MSR35 and MSR45 lead to a CSRF vulnerability. It allows attacker to elevate privilege of specific account via useradmin/cf_new.cgi?chief=&wk_group=full&cf_name=test&cf_account=test&cf_email=&cf_acl=Management&apply_lang=&dn= without any authorizes.