Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2019-11737

Summary
Assigner-mozilla
Assigner Org ID-f16b083a-5664-49f3-a51e-8d479e5ed7fe
Published At-27 Sep, 2019 | 17:20
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected At-
Credits

If a wildcard ('*') is specified for the host in Content Security Policy (CSP) directives, any port or path restriction of the directive will be ignored, leading to CSP directives not being properly applied to content. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mozilla
Assigner Org ID:f16b083a-5664-49f3-a51e-8d479e5ed7fe
Published At:27 Sep, 2019 | 17:20
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

If a wildcard ('*') is specified for the host in Content Security Policy (CSP) directives, any port or path restriction of the directive will be ignored, leading to CSP directives not being properly applied to content. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69.

Affected Products
Vendor
Mozilla CorporationMozilla
Product
Firefox
Versions
Affected
  • From unspecified before 69 (custom)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/AContent security policy directives ignore port and path if host is a wildcard
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: Content security policy directives ignore port and path if host is a wildcard
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388015
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-25/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388015
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-25/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388015
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-25/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388015
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-25/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security@mozilla.org
Published At:27 Sep, 2019 | 18:15
Updated At:02 Oct, 2019 | 13:40

If a wildcard ('*') is specified for the host in Content Security Policy (CSP) directives, any port or path restriction of the directive will be ignored, leading to CSP directives not being properly applied to content. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

Mozilla Corporation
mozilla
>>firefox>>Versions before 69.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-345Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-345
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388015security@mozilla.org
Issue Tracking
Permissions Required
Vendor Advisory
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-25/security@mozilla.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1388015
Source: security@mozilla.org
Resource:
Issue Tracking
Permissions Required
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2019-25/
Source: security@mozilla.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

175Records found

CVE-2017-11379
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Trend Micro, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Configuration and database backup archives are not signed or validated in Trend Micro Deep Discovery Director 1.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Trend Micro Incorporated
Product-deep_discovery_directorTrend Micro Deep Discovery Director
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2017-10862
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 45.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

jwt-scala 1.2.2 and earlier fails to verify token signatures correctly which may lead to an attacker being able to pass specially crafted JWT data as a correctly signed token.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-reallyreallyl IO
Product-jwt-scalajwt-scala
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2023-35906
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.01% / 1.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Sep, 2023 | 00:52
Updated-27 Sep, 2024 | 13:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Aspera Faspex security bypass

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.5 could allow a remote attacked to bypass IP restrictions due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 259649.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-aspera_faspexlinux_kernelAspera Faspexaspera_faspex
CWE ID-CWE-291
Reliance on IP Address for Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2023-35764
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 56.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2024 | 07:10
Updated-12 Aug, 2024 | 21:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Insufficient verification of data authenticity issue in Survey Maker prior to 3.6.4 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to spoof an IP address when posting.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-AYS Pro Extensions
Product-Survey Makersurvey_maker
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2017-12972
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 35.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Aug, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Nimbus JOSE+JWT before 4.39, there is no integer-overflow check when converting length values from bytes to bits, which allows attackers to conduct HMAC bypass attacks by shifting Additional Authenticated Data (AAD) and ciphertext so that different plaintext is obtained for the same HMAC.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-connect2idn/a
Product-nimbus_jose\+jwtn/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2023-27977
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Schneider Electric
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 19.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-05 Feb, 2025 | 20:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability exists in the Data Server that could cause access to delete files in the IGSS project report directory, this could lead to loss of data when an attacker sends specific crafted messages to the Data Server TCP port. Affected Products: IGSS Data Server(IGSSdataServer.exe)(V16.0.0.23040 and prior), IGSS Dashboard(DashBoard.exe)(V16.0.0.23040 and prior), Custom Reports(RMS16.dll)(V16.0.0.23040 and prior).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Schneider Electric SE
Product-custom_reportsigss_dashboardigss_data_serverIGSS Dashboard (DashBoard.exe)IGSS Data Server(IGSSdataServer.exe)Custom Reports (RMS16.dll)
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2020-13265
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jun, 2020 | 21:42
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

User email verification bypass in GitLab CE/EE 12.5 and later through 13.0.1 allows user to bypass email verification

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2016-9450
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.47%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Nov, 2016 | 18:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The user password reset form in Drupal 8.x before 8.2.3 allows remote attackers to conduct cache poisoning attacks by leveraging failure to specify a correct cache context.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe Drupal Association
Product-drupaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2019-6475
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Internet Systems Consortium (ISC)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Internet Systems Consortium (ISC)
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.66% / 70.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Oct, 2019 | 19:17
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
A flaw in mirror zone validity checking can allow zone data to be spoofed

Mirror zones are a BIND feature allowing recursive servers to pre-cache zone data provided by other servers. A mirror zone is similar to a zone of type secondary, except that its data is subject to DNSSEC validation before being used in answers, as if it had been looked up via traditional recursion, and when mirror zone data cannot be validated, BIND falls back to using traditional recursion instead of the mirror zone. However, an error in the validity checks for the incoming zone data can allow an on-path attacker to replace zone data that was validated with a configured trust anchor with forged data of the attacker's choosing. The mirror zone feature is most often used to serve a local copy of the root zone. If an attacker was able to insert themselves into the network path between a recursive server using a mirror zone and a root name server, this vulnerability could then be used to cause the recursive server to accept a copy of falsified root zone data. This affects BIND versions 9.14.0 up to 9.14.6, and 9.15.0 up to 9.15.4.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
Product-bindBIND 9
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2019-3979
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 39.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Oct, 2019 | 21:33
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 19:26
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

RouterOS versions 6.45.6 Stable, 6.44.5 Long-term, and below are vulnerable to a DNS unrelated data attack. The router adds all A records to its DNS cache even when the records are unrelated to the domain that was queried. Therefore, a remote attacker controlled DNS server can poison the router's DNS cache via malicious responses with additional and untrue records.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMikroTik
Product-routerosMikroTik RouterOS
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2016-4554
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-40.57% / 97.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 May, 2016 | 19:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

mime_header.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 allows remote attackers to bypass intended same-origin restrictions and possibly conduct cache-poisoning attacks via a crafted HTTP Host header, aka a "header smuggling" issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSquid CacheOracle CorporationCanonical Ltd.
Product-squidlinuxubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2016-4553
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-39.53% / 97.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 May, 2016 | 19:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

client_side.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 does not properly ignore the Host header when absolute-URI is provided, which allows remote attackers to conduct cache-poisoning attacks via an HTTP request.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSquid CacheOracle CorporationCanonical Ltd.
Product-squidlinuxubuntu_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2016-1731
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.16% / 37.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Mar, 2016 | 01:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apple Software Update before 2.2 on Windows does not use HTTPS, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof updates by modifying the client-server data stream.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-software_updaten/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2019-10943
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Aug, 2019 | 18:55
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 22:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Drive Controller family (All versions), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V20.8), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V20.8), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V4.4.0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V4.4.0), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.8.1), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions >= V2.8.1), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller (All versions < V20.8), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller (All versions >= V20.8), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions < V3.0), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced (All versions >= V3.0). An attacker with network access to port 102/tcp could potentially modify the user program on the PLC in a way that the running code is different from the source code which is stored on the device. An attacker must have network access to affected devices and must be able to perform changes to the user program. The vulnerability could impact the perceived integrity of the user program stored on the CPU. An engineer that tries to obtain the code of the user program running on the device, can receive different source code that is not actually running on the device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-simatic_et_200sp_open_controller_cpu_1515sp_pc2_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1217c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_software_controllersimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511csimatic_s7_plcsim_advancedsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1211csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1212csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518simatic_et_200sp_open_controller_cpu_1515sp_pc_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512csimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1511c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1518_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1217csimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1214c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1500_cpu_1512c_firmwaresimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1215c_firmwaresimatic_et_200sp_open_controller_cpu_1515sp_pcsimatic_s7-1200_cpu_1211c_firmwaresimatic_et_200sp_open_controller_cpu_1515sp_pc2SIMATIC S7-1500 Software ControllerSIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC Drive Controller familySIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC (incl. SIPLUS variants)SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced
CWE ID-CWE-353
Missing Support for Integrity Check
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2018-17938
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.89% / 74.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Oct, 2018 | 08:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 11:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Zimbra Collaboration before 8.8.10 GA allows text content spoofing via a loginErrorCode value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSynacor, Inc.
Product-zimbra_collaboration_suiten/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2022-4533
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 27.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2024 | 03:59
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 18:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Limit Login Attempts Plus <= 1.1.0 - IP Address Spoofing to Protection Mechanism Bypass

The Limit Login Attempts Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Address Spoofing in versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to insufficient restrictions on where the IP Address information is being retrieved for request logging and login restrictions. Attackers can supply the X-Forwarded-For header with with a different IP Address that will be logged and can be used to bypass settings that may have blocked out an IP address or country from logging in.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-felixmoiradevfelixmoiralimit_login_attempts_project
Product-limit_login_attempts_plusLimit Login Attempts Plus – WordPress Limit Login Attempts By Felixlimit_login_attempts_plus
CWE ID-CWE-348
Use of Less Trusted Source
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2022-4539
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Wordfence
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-5.69% / 90.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Aug, 2024 | 09:35
Updated-19 Sep, 2024 | 13:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Web Application Firewall <= 2.1.2 - IP Address Spoofing to Protection Mechanism Bypass

The Web Application Firewall plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Address Spoofing in versions up to, and including, 2.1.2. This is due to insufficient restrictions on where the IP Address information is being retrieved for request logging and login restrictions. Attackers can supply the X-Forwarded-For header with with a different IP Address that will be logged and can be used to bypass settings that may have blocked out an IP address or country from logging in.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-miniorangecyberlord92miniorange
Product-web_application_firewallWeb Application Firewall – website securityweb_application_firewall
CWE ID-CWE-348
Use of Less Trusted Source
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2019-12620
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.23% / 46.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Sep, 2019 | 16:15
Updated-19 Nov, 2024 | 18:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco HyperFlex Software Counter Value Injection Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the statistics collection service of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary values on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient authentication for the statistics collection service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending properly formatted data values to the statistics collection service of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the web interface statistics view to present invalid data to users.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-hyperflex_hx240c_af_m5hyperflex_hx240c_m5hyperflex_hx220c_m5hyperflex_hx240c_m5_firmwarehyperflex_hx220c_edge_m5hyperflex_hx220c_m5_firmwarehyperflex_hx220c_af_m5_firmwarehyperflex_hx240c_af_m5_firmwarehyperflex_hx220c_edge_m5_firmwarehyperflex_hx220c_af_m5Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2021-32665
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2021 | 21:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Verified groups not reliable

wire-ios is the iOS version of Wire, an open-source secure messaging app. wire-ios versions 3.8.0 and earlier have a bug in which a conversation could be incorrectly set to "unverified. This occurs when: - Self user is added to a new conversation - Self user is added to an existing conversation - All the participants in the conversation were previously marked as verified. The vulnerability is patched in wire-ios version 3.8.1. As a workaround, one can unverify & verify a device in the conversation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wirewireapp
Product-wirewire-ios
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2017-11178
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Jul, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In FineCMS through 2017-07-11, application/core/controller/style.php allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via the contents and filename parameters in a route=style action. For example, this can be used to overwrite a .php file because the file extension is not checked.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-finecms_projectn/a
Product-finecmsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2024-35175
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 25.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 May, 2024 | 22:05
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 03:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
sshpiper's Enabling of Proxy Protocol without proper feature flagging allows faking source address

sshpiper is a reverse proxy for sshd. Starting in version 1.0.50 and prior to version 1.3.0, the way the proxy protocol listener is implemented in sshpiper can allow an attacker to forge their connecting address. Commit 2ddd69876a1e1119059debc59fe869cb4e754430 added the proxy protocol listener as the only listener in sshpiper, with no option to toggle this functionality off. This means that any connection that sshpiper is directly (or in some cases indirectly) exposed to can use proxy protocol to forge its source address. Any users of sshpiper who need logs from it for whitelisting/rate limiting/security investigations could have them become much less useful if an attacker is sending a spoofed source address. Version 1.3.0 contains a patch for the issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tg123tg123
Product-sshpipersshpiper
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2024-31341
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Patchstack
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2024 | 08:19
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 01:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
WordPress User Profile Builder plugin <= 3.11.2 - Bypass Vulnerability vulnerability

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Cozmoslabs Profile Builder allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects Profile Builder: from n/a through 3.11.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cozmoslabscozmoslabs
Product-Profile Builderprofile_builder
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2024-27305
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.56% / 67.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2024 | 20:29
Updated-22 Jan, 2025 | 15:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SMTP smuggling in aiosmtpd

aiosmtpd is a reimplementation of the Python stdlib smtpd.py based on asyncio. aiosmtpd is vulnerable to inbound SMTP smuggling. SMTP smuggling is a novel vulnerability based on not so novel interpretation differences of the SMTP protocol. By exploiting SMTP smuggling, an attacker may send smuggle/spoof e-mails with fake sender addresses, allowing advanced phishing attacks. This issue is also existed in other SMTP software like Postfix. With the right SMTP server constellation, an attacker can send spoofed e-mails to inbound/receiving aiosmtpd instances. This issue has been addressed in version 1.4.5. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-aio-libsaio-libsaio-libs
Product-aiosmtpdaiosmtpdaiosmtpd
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2024-25584
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Open-Xchange
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Open-Xchange
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 20.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Sep, 2024 | 15:02
Updated-06 Sep, 2024 | 16:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dovecot accepts dot LF DOT LF symbol as end of DATA command. RFC requires that it should always be CR LF DOT CR LF. This causes Dovecot to convert single mail with LF DOT LF in middle, into two emails when relaying to SMTP. Dovecot will split mail with LF DOT LF into two mails. Upgrade to latest released version. No publicly available exploits are known.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open-Xchange AG
Product-OX Dovecot Pro
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CVE-2024-5458
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-PHP Group
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.88% / 82.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jun, 2024 | 18:26
Updated-14 Mar, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Filter bypass in filter_var (FILTER_VALIDATE_URL)

In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, due to a code logic error, filtering functions such as filter_var when validating URLs (FILTER_VALIDATE_URL) for certain types of URLs the function will result in invalid user information (username + password part of URLs) being treated as valid user information. This may lead to the downstream code accepting invalid URLs as valid and parsing them incorrectly.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-phpFedora ProjectThe PHP Group
Product-phpfedoraPHPphpfedora
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found