In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11.1 a CSRF on login was possible

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2.1, URL injection leading to CSRF was possible.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible on GraphQL endpoint

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in GitHub App connection flow

A CSRF vulnerability was detected in one of the admin endpoints of JetBrains YouTrack. The issue was fixed in YouTrack 2018.4.49852.

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.4.4701, CSRF via attachment upload was possible.

JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA projects created using the Kotlin (JS Client/JVM Server) IDE Template were resolving Gradle artifacts using an http connection, potentially allowing an MITM attack. This issue, which was fixed in Kotlin plugin version 1.3.30, is similar to CVE-2019-10101.

JetBrains dotPeek before 2018.2 and ReSharper Ultimate before 2018.1.4 allow attackers to execute code by decompiling a compiled .NET object (such as a DLL or EXE file) with a specific file, because of Deserialization of Untrusted Data.

JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2 was vulnerable to a Time-of-check/Time-of-use (TOCTOU) race-condition attack in agent registration via XML-RPC.

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had a possible remote code execution issue. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

In JetBrains JetBrains Gateway before 2022.3 a client could connect without a valid token if the host consented.

JetBrains Kotlin versions before 1.3.30 were resolving artifacts using an http connection during the build process, potentially allowing an MITM attack.

JetBrains Ktor framework (created using the Kotlin IDE template) versions before 1.1.0 were resolving artifacts using an http connection during the build process, potentially allowing an MITM attack. This issue was fixed in Kotlin plugin version 1.3.30.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.2.3, account takeover was potentially possible during a password reset.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in external OAuth login integration

The companion-auto-update plugin before 3.2.1 for WordPress has CSRF.

Machform prior to version 16 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery due to a lack of CSRF tokens in place.

The church-admin plugin before 1.2550 for WordPress has CSRF affecting the upload of a bible reading plan.

The js-support-ticket plugin before 2.0.6 for WordPress has CSRF.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.12.0, 5.11.1, 5.10.2, 5.9.2, and 4.10.10. The login page allows CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 4.0.4.0, and Aipo for ASP before 4.0.4.0, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify data.

WooCommerce before 3.6.5, when it handles CSV imports of products, has a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issue with resultant stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via includes/admin/importers/class-wc-product-csv-importer-controller.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Apache Archiva 1.0 through 1.2.2, and 1.3.x before 1.3.5, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in unspecified administrative modules in Proofpoint Messaging Security Gateway 6.2.0.263:6.2.0.237 and earlier in Proofpoint Protection Server 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 6.0.2, 6.1.1, and 6.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unknown vectors.

A vulnerability was found in MdAlAmin-aol Own Health Record 0.1-alpha/0.2-alpha/0.3-alpha/0.3.1-alpha. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file includes/logout.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 0.4-alpha is able to address this issue. The patch is named 58b413aa40820b49070782c786c526850ab7748f. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-249191.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Drupal Symfony Mailer Lite: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in mainfile.php in Francisco Burzi PHP-Nuke 8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts or (2) grant the administrative privilege to a user account, related to a Referer check that uses a substring comparison.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the pieforms implementation in Mahara before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to any form, related to inappropriate regeneration of session keys.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Migrate Tools allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Migrate Tools: from 0.0.0 before 6.0.3.

NETGEAR ReadyNAS devices before 6.9.3 are affected by CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WordPress File Upload plugin (wp-file-upload) before 2.4.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach.

The Option Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the plugin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Concrete CMS <v9 that could allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of other users.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Migrate queue importer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Migrate queue importer: from 0.0.0 before 2.1.1.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Performance Management before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList before 2.10.13 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) edit administrator accounts.

Jensen of Scandinavia AS Air:Link 3G (AL3G) version 2.23m (Rev. 3), Air:Link 5000AC (AL5000AC) version 1.13, and Air:Link 59300 (AL59300) version 1.04 (Rev. 4) devices allow remote attackers to conduct CSRF attacks via certain /goform/* pages.

The Simple Download Monitor WordPress plugin before 3.9.9 does not enforce nonce checks, which could allow attackers to perform CSRF attacks to 1) make admins export logs to exploit a separate log disclosure vulnerability (fixed in 3.9.6), 2) delete logs (fixed in 3.9.9), 3) remove thumbnail image from downloads

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 does not have CSRF protection on its kcfinder file upload (enabled by default). This can be used by an attacker to perform actions for an admin (or any user with the file upload capability). With this vulnerability, one can automatically upload files (by default, it allows html, pdf, xml, zip, and many other file types). A file can be accessed publicly under the "/assets/files" directory.

Droppy versions <3.5.0 does not perform any verification for cross-domain websocket requests. An attacker is able to make a specially crafted page that can send requests as the context of the currently logged in user. For example this means the malicious user could add a new admin account under his control and delete others.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security Identity Manager 5.1, 6.0, and 7.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that can cause cross-site scripting attacks, web cache poisoning, or other unspecified impacts via unknown vectors.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.9 and 2.4.x before 2.4.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via destructive controller actions, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-5087.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Huawei HiLink E3276 and E3236 TCPU before V200R002B470D13SP00C00 and WebUI before V100R007B100D03SP01C03, E5180s-22 before 21.270.21.00.00, and E586Bs-2 before 21.322.10.00.889 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) modify configurations, (2) send SMS messages, or have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors.

Advisto PEEL SHOPPING 9.0.0 has CSRF via en/achat/caddie_ajout.php and en/achat/caddie_affichage.php, as demonstrated by an XSS payload in the couleurId[0] parameter to the latter.

In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence, versions 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2, while viewing a Web Intelligence report from BI Launchpad, the user session details captured by an HTTP analysis tool could be reused in a HTML page while the user session is still valid.

Batavi before 1.0 has CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/conf_users_edit.php in PHP Link Directory (phpLD) 4.1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrator via the N action.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox before 3.5.17 and 3.6.x before 3.6.14, and SeaMonkey before 2.0.12, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that were initiated by a plugin and received a 307 redirect to a page on a different web site.