A CSRF vulnerability exists in the FTP Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. Exploitation of this vulnerability can result in manipulation of Server FTP settings at RAPR/FTPSettingsSet.html.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Create/Delete Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can Create and Delete accounts via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Network Setting functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can manipulate the SMTP setting and other network settings via RAPR/NetworkSettingsSet.html.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Event Notices Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. An attacker can create/update event notices via RAPR/EventNoticesSet.html.

A Cookie based reflected XSS exists in the Web File Manager of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1, related to RumpusLoginUserName and snp.

An issue was discovered in Rumpus 8.2.10 on macOS. By crafting a directory name, it is possible to activate JavaScript in the context of the web application after invoking the rename folder functionality.

A HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability was identified in the Web Settings Component of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. A successful exploit can result in stored XSS, website defacement, etc. via ExtraHTTPHeader to RAPR/WebSettingsGeneralSet.html.

A Reflected Cross Site Scripting was discovered in the Login page of Rumpus FTP Web File Manager 8.2.9.1. An attacker can exploit it by sending a crafted link to end users and can execute arbitrary Javascripts

Rumpus - FTP server Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) – Privilege escalation vulnerability that may allow privilege escalation.

Rumpus - FTP server version 9.0.7.1 Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) – vulnerability may allow unauthorized action on behalf of authenticated users.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Upload Center Forms Component of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. This could allow an attacker to delete, create, and update the upload forms via RAPR/TriggerServerFunction.html.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web File Manager's Edit Accounts functionality of Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. By exploiting it, an attacker can take over a user account by changing the password, update users' details, and escalate privileges via RAPR/DefineUsersSet.html.

Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF). If an authenticated user visits a malicious page, unintended actions could be performed in the web application as the authenticated user.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Folder Sets Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. This allows an attacker to Create/Delete Folders after exploiting it at RAPR/FolderSetsSet.html.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Web Settings of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1. Exploitation of this vulnerability can result in manipulation of Server Web settings at RAPR/WebSettingsGeneralSet.html.

A CSRF vulnerability exists in the Block Clients component of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP 8.2.9.1 that could allow an attacker to whitelist or block any IP address via RAPR/BlockedClients.html.

The beauty-premium theme 1.0.8 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant arbitrary file upload in includes/sendmail.php.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration screen in wp-relatedposts.php in the WP Related Posts plugin 1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) wp_relatedposts_title, (2) wp_relatedposts_num, or (3) wp_relatedposts_type parameter.

The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add new todo items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Ultimate Tag Warrior Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import tags granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sender Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce.This issue affects Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.6.18.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Forms/PortForwarding_Edit_1 on the ZyXEL O2 DSL Router Classic allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the PortRule_Name parameter.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changeson behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction.

The Similarity WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick users into performing an action they didn't intend to perform under their current authentication. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changes on behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction.

Prior to microweber/microweber v1.2.20, due to improper neutralization of input, an attacker can steal tokens to perform cross-site request forgery, fetch contents from same-site and redirect a user.

The WP To Do plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wptodo_addcomment function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add comments to to do items via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress.This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.2.6.8.2.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList 2.10.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create a list or (2) insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-0748. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wpmet Wp Ultimate Review plugin <= 2.0.3 versions.

Prospecta Master Data Online (MDO) allows CSRF.

The Similarity WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when resetting its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in news/admin.php in N-13 News 3.4, 3.7, and 4.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create new users via the options action. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.

Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick users into performing an action they didn't intend to perform under their current authentication. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

The Easy Digital Downloads WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting payment history, and does not ensure that the post to be deleted is actually a payment history. As a result, attackers could make a logged in admin delete arbitrary post via a CSRF attack

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marsian i-amaze allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects i-amaze: from n/a through 1.3.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to plugin Settings Update discovered in WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.4.4).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Rara Business allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rara Business: from n/a through 1.2.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Labib Ahmed Animated Rotating Words allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Animated Rotating Words: from n/a through 5.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Internal Link Juicer Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress.This issue affects Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress: from n/a through 2.24.3.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Shared Objects Plugin 0.44 and earlier allows attackers to configure shared objects.

The Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.10.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_update_plugin_params function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin options granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Creativthemes Point allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Point: from n/a through 1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Google Adsense & Banner Ads by AdsforWP allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Google Adsense & Banner Ads by AdsforWP: from n/a through 1.9.28.

A vulnerability has been found in Guangdong Pythagorean OA Office System up to 4.50.31 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /note/index/delete. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230458 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themes4WP Popularis Verse allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Popularis Verse: from n/a through 1.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search.This issue affects WP Fast Total Search: from n/a through 1.69.234.

A vulnerability was found in SMI SMI-EX-5414W up to 1.0.03. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component Web Interface. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-260907.