Adobe RoboHelp version 2015.0.3 and earlier, RoboHelp 11 and earlier have an input validation issue that could be used in cross-site scripting attacks.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the MDS API in Microsoft SQL Server 2016 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an unspecified parameter, aka "MDS API XSS Vulnerability."
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) does not properly sanitize a specially-crafted web request to an affected SSRS server, aka 'Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services XSS Vulnerability'.
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Azure DevOps Server and Team Foundation Server do not properly sanitize user provided input, aka 'Azure DevOps Server and Team Foundation Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0867, CVE-2019-0868, CVE-2019-0870, CVE-2019-0871.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jQuery UI before 1.12.0 might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the closeText parameter of the dialog function.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 and Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, aka "Microsoft Browser Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7206.
Document Object Model-(DOM) based cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Advanced Management Module (AMM) versions earlier than 66Z of Lenovo IBM BladeCenter HS22, HS22V, HS23, HS23E, HX5 allows an unauthenticated attacker with access to the AMM's IP address to send a crafted URL that could inject a malicious script to access a user's AMM data such as cookies or other session information.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7280.
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Azure DevOps Server and Team Foundation Server do not properly sanitize user provided input, aka 'Azure DevOps Server and Team Foundation Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0866, CVE-2019-0868, CVE-2019-0870, CVE-2019-0871.
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is vulnerable to cross-frame scripting, caused by insufficient HTML iframe protection. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially-crafted URL to navigate to a web page the attacker controls. An attacker could use this vulnerability to conduct clickjacking or other client-side browser attacks.
IBM Resilient v26.0, v26.1, and v26.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM Reference#: 213457065.
The Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy (SSP) 3.4.2 before 3.4.2.0 iFix 8 and 3.4.3 before 3.4.3.0 iFix 1 does not enable the HSTS protection mechanism, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or modify data by leveraging use of HTTP.
IBM iNotes 8.5 and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM Reference #: 1997010.
The authentication applet in Watchguard Fireware 11.11 Operating System has reflected XSS (this can also cause an open redirect).
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Azure DevOps Server does not properly sanitize user provided input, aka 'Azure DevOps Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability'.
IBM iNotes is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
A spoofing vulnerability exists when a Lync Server or Skype for Business Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted request, aka 'Skype for Business and Lync Spoofing Vulnerability'.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Rational Focal Point 6.5.x and 6.6.x before 6.6.0.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
IBM iNotes is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alt-N MDaemon WorldClient 10.0.2, when Internet Explorer 7 is used, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted img tag.
Mozilla Firefox before 48.0 and Firefox ESR 45.x before 45.3 process JavaScript event-handler attributes of a MARQUEE element within a sandboxed IFRAME element that lacks the sandbox="allow-scripts" attribute value, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted web site.
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 Beta 2 relies on the XDomainRequestAllowed HTTP header to authorize data exchange between domains, which allows remote attackers to bypass the product's XSS Filter protection mechanism, and conduct XSS and cross-domain attacks, by injecting this header after a CRLF sequence, related to "XDomainRequest Allowed Injection (XAI)." NOTE: the vendor has reportedly stated that the XSS Filter intentionally does not attempt to "address every conceivable XSS attack scenario."
The XSS Filter in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 Beta 2 allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS protection mechanism and conduct XSS attacks by injecting data at two different positions within an HTML document, related to STYLE elements and the CSS expression property, aka a "double injection."
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the XSS filter (framework/Text_Filter/Filter/xss.php) in Horde Application Framework 3.2.2 and 3.3, when Internet Explorer is being used, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unknown vectors related to style attributes.
A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Azure DevOps Server and Team Foundation Server do not properly sanitize user provided input, aka 'Azure DevOps Server and Team Foundation Server Cross-site Scripting Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0866, CVE-2019-0867, CVE-2019-0868, CVE-2019-0870.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Workplace for Business Controls and Reporting 2.x and IBM Workplace Web Content Management 6.x allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
The XSS Filter in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 Beta 2 does not recognize attack patterns designed to operate against web pages that are encoded with utf-7, which allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS protection mechanism and conduct XSS attacks by injecting crafted utf-7 content. NOTE: the vendor reportedly disputes this issue, stating "Behaviour is by design.
The XSS Filter in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 Beta 2 disables itself upon encountering a certain X-XSS-Protection HTTP header, which allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS protection mechanism and conduct XSS attacks by injecting this header after a CRLF sequence. NOTE: the vendor has reportedly stated that the XSS Filter intentionally does not attempt to "address every conceivable XSS attack scenario."
The XSS Filter in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 Beta 2 does not properly handle some HTTP headers that appear after a CRLF sequence in a URI, which allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS protection mechanism and conduct XSS or redirection attacks, as demonstrated by the (1) Location and (2) Set-Cookie HTTP headers. NOTE: the vendor has reportedly stated that the XSS Filter intentionally does not attempt to "address every conceivable XSS attack scenario."
The XSS Filter in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 Beta 2 allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS protection mechanism and conduct XSS attacks via a CRLF sequence in conjunction with a crafted Content-Type header, as demonstrated by a header with a utf-7 charset value. NOTE: the vendor has reportedly stated that the XSS Filter intentionally does not attempt to "address every conceivable XSS attack scenario."
IBM Business Automation Workflow containers 24.0.0 through 24.0.0-IF006, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1-IF004, 25.0.0 through 25.0.0-IF001 and IBM Business Automation Workflow traditional with Process Federation Server 24.0.0 through 24.0.1 and 25.0.0 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Quickr 8.1 before 8.1.0.2 services for Lotus Domino allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, possibly related to qpconfig_sample.xml, aka SPR CWIR7KMPVP and THES7F9NVR, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2163 and CVE-2008-3860.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in configuration/httpListenerEdit.jsf in the GlassFish 2 UR2 b04 webadmin interface in Sun Java System Application Server 9.1_01 build b09d-fcs and 9.1_02 build b04-fcs allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the name parameter, a different vector than CVE-2008-2751.
A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server when Outlook Web Access (OWA) fails to properly handle web requests, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Spoofing Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0817.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in CQ Web in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.0.0 before 7.0.0.4 and 7.0.1 before 7.0.1.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.12 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site.
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.1.0 for Z hub framework is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Optim Workload Replay 1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for ACH Services and Check Services for Multi-Platform 3.0.0.0 through 3.0.5.4 Interim Fix 027 IBM Financial Transaction Manager for Check Services v3 (Multiplatforms) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.11.0.0 and 2.11.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.0.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web interface in ClearCase RWP server in IBM Rational ClearCase 7.0.0 before 7.0.0.4, and 7.0.1.1-RATL-RCC-IFIX02 and possibly other 7.0.1 versions before 7.0.1.3, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the PATH_INFO of a URI associated with a VOB page.
IBM Copy Services Manager 6.3.13 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Affected Product(s)Version(s)InfoSphere Data Architect9.2.1
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in CQ Web in IBM Rational ClearQuest 2007 before 2007D and 2008 before 2008B allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Connections 2.x before 2.0.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the community title, (2) API input, and vectors related to the (3) Homepage, (4) Blogs, (5) Profiles, (6) Dogear, (7) Activities, and (8) Global Search components. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1 and 11.2 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 213966.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Web Dynpro (WD) in the SAP NetWeaver portal, when Internet Explorer 7.0.5730 is used, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URI, which causes the XSS payload to be reflected in a text/plain document.