IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 175423.

IBM Common Licensing 9.0 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 297895.

IBM BigFix Compliance (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) 1.9.70 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 123671.

IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager (IBM BigFix 9.2 and 9.5) does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 123861.

IBM Security Guardium 11.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 196279.

IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 184181.

IBM PureApplication System 2.2.3.0 through 2.2.5.3 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 159417.

IBM QRadar Network Packet Capture 7.3.0 - 7.3.3 Patch 1 and 7.4.0 GA does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 166803.

IBM Intelligent Operations Center (IOC) 5.1.0 through 5.2.0 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 157012.

IBM Security Key Lifecycle Manager 3.0 and 3.0.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 166626.

IBM Intelligent Operations Center V5.1.0 - V5.2.0, IBM Intelligent Operations Center for Emergency Management V5.1.0 - V5.1.0.6, and IBM Water Operations for Waternamics V5.1.0 - V5.2.1.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 161201.

IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.0 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 153628.

IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager Virtual Appliance 2.2.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 145236.

IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 3.1 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 137772.

IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 210892.

IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610.

IBM Sterling Order Management 10.0 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 229698.

IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 and 11.2.0 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 196339.

IBM WebSphere Portal 6.0.1.1 through 7.0.0.0, as used in IBM Lotus Web Content Management (WCM) and IBM Lotus Quickr for WebSphere Portal, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a "modified message."

The JavaServer Faces (JSF) application functionality in IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.x before 8.0.0.1 does not properly handle requests, which allows remote attackers to read unspecified files via unknown vectors.

IBM Jazz Team Server, as used in Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management; Rational Quality Manager 3.x before 3.0.1.6 iFix 3, 4.x before 4.0.7, and 5.x before 5.0.1; and other Rational products, does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.

IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.5, 9.1.6, 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 temporarily stores data from different environments that could be obtained by a malicious user. IBM X-Force ID: 295791.

IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 7.1.0 before 7.1.0.3 and 7.1.1 before 7.1.1.1 has an improper account-lockout setting, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force attack.

IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.5, 9.1.6, 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 295970.

Directory traversal vulnerability in IBM Tivoli WebSEAL Policy Director 3.01 through 3.7.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or directories via encoded .. (dot dot) sequences containing "%2e" strings.

IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information.

The default configuration of the Sametime configuration servlet (SCS) in the server in IBM Lotus Sametime 7.0 through 8.5.2 does not enable an authentication requirement, which allows remote attackers to read the configuration settings by examining a response message.

Directory traversal vulnerability in the administration console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.41, 7.0 before 7.0.0.19, and 8.0 before 8.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the URI.

IBM Storage Defender 2.0.0 through 2.0.7 on-prem defender-sensor-cmd CLI could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by sending network requests over an insecure channel. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.

The Administrative Console component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.35 and 7.0 before 7.0.0.15 does not properly restrict access to console servlets, which allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive status information via a direct request.

IBM Runtime Environment, Java Technology Edition IBMJCEPlus and JSSE 8.0.7.0 through 8.0.7.11 components could expose sensitive information using a combination of flaws and configurations. IBM X-Force ID: 253188.

Directory traversal vulnerability in WebSEAL in IBM Tivoli Access Manager for e-business 5.1 before 5.1.0.39-TIV-AWS-IF0040, 6.0 before 6.0.0.25-TIV-AWS-IF0026, 6.1.0 before 6.1.0.5-TIV-AWS-IF0006, and 6.1.1 before 6.1.1-TIV-AWS-FP0001 has unspecified impact and attack vectors. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2010-4622.

The rwho/rwhod service is running, which exposes machine status and user information.

IBM Maximo Application Suite - Manage Component 8.10, 8.11, and 9.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.

IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) before 6.0.2.13 allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors related to "JSP source code exposure" (PK23475), which occurs when ibm-web-ext.xmi sets fileServingEnabled to true or ExtendedDocumentRoot is used to place a JSP outside a WAR.file; (3) the First Failure Data Capture (ffdc) log file (PK24834); and (4) traces (PK25568), a different issue than CVE-2006-4137.

IBM OmniFind Enterprise Edition 8.x and 9.x does not properly restrict the cookie path of administrator (aka ESAdmin) cookies, which might allow remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging access to other pages on the web site.

RIP v1 is susceptible to spoofing.

Dojo Toolkit, as used in the Web client in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.1.x before 7.1.1.4 and 7.1.2.x before 7.1.2.1, allows remote attackers to read cookies by navigating to a Dojo file, related to an "open direct" issue.

Directory traversal vulnerability in WebSEAL in IBM Tivoli Access Manager for e-business 6.1.1 before 6.1.1-TIV-AWS-FP0001 on AIX allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a %uff0e%uff0e (encoded dot dot) in a URI.

IBM Security Verify Governance, Identity Manager virtual appliance component 10.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 225078.

IBM Security Verify Identity Manager 10.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 224919.

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next 7.0.2, 7.0.3, and 7.1 could allow a remote attacker to download temporary files which could expose application logic or other sensitive information.

IBM Aspera Faspex 4.4.1 and 5.0.0 could allow unauthorized access due to an incorrectly computed security token. IBM X-Force ID: 226951.

IBM Disconnected Log Collector 1.0 through 1.8.2 is vulnerable to potential security misconfigurations that could disclose unintended information. IBM X-Force ID: 224648.

IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could disclose sensitive information to an attacked due to the transmission of data in clear text. IBM X-Force ID: 221962.

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.5 could allow a remote attacker to gather or persuade a naive user to supply sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 222567.

IBM QRadar Data Synchronization App 1.0 through 3.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 217370.

ESSearchApplication/palette.do in IBM OmniFind Enterprise Edition 8.x and 9.x includes the administrator password in the HTML source code, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging read access to this file.

IBM Navigator for i 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 (heritage version) could allow a remote attacker to obtain access to the web interface without valid credentials. By modifying the sign on request, an attacker can gain visibility to the fully qualified domain name of the target system and the navigator tasks page, however they do not gain the ability to perform those tasks on the system or see any specific system data. IBM X-Force ID: 225899.

IBM Spectrum Protect Operations Center 8.1.0.000 through 8.1.14 could allow a remote attacker to gain details of the database, such as type and version, by sending a specially-crafted HTTP request. This information could then be used in future attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 226940.