Magento Community Edition and Enterprise Edition before 2.0.10 and 2.1.x before 2.1.2 have CSRF resulting in deletion of a customer address from an address book, aka APPSEC-1433.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in the GiftCardAccount removal feature for Magento Open Source prior to 1.9.4.2, and Magento Commerce prior to 1.14.4.2, Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2.

OpenMage LTS before versions 19.4.6 and 20.0.2 allows attackers to circumvent the `fromkey protection` in the Admin Interface and increases the attack surface for Cross Site Request Forgery attacks. This issue is related to Adobe's CVE-2020-9690. It is patched in versions 19.4.6 and 20.0.2.

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.10, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.3 or 2.3.2-p1. An authenticated user can craft a malicious CSRF payload that can result in arbitrary command execution.

Magento prior to 1.9.4.3 and prior to 1.14.4.3 included a user's CSRF token in the URL of a GET request. This could be exploited by an attacker with access to network traffic to perform unauthorized actions.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can lead to unintended data deletion from customer pages.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can result in unintended deletion of user roles.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can cause unwanted items to be added to a shopper's cart due to an insufficiently robust anti-CSRF token implementation.

Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the GraphQL API. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of customer metadata by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2. This can result in unintended deletion of the store design schedule.

The wp-rollback plugin before 1.2.3 for WordPress has CSRF.

The facebook-for-woocommerce plugin before 1.9.14 for WordPress has CSRF.

The one-click-ssl plugin before 1.4.7 for WordPress has CSRF.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/admin_options.php in VR GPub 4.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that add admin accounts via an add action.

The users-ultra plugin before 1.5.63 for WordPress has CSRF via action=package_add_new to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php.

usersettings.php in e107 through 2.3.0 lacks a certain e_TOKEN protection mechanism.

joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has admin_ajax.php?action=savexml&tab=vodplay CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the DVS Custom Notification plugin 1.0.1 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change application settings or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

The visitors-traffic-real-time-statistics plugin before 1.13 for WordPress has CSRF.

The cp-contact-form-with-paypal (aka CP Contact Form with PayPal) plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS, related to cp_contactformpp.php and cp_contactformpp_admin_int_list.inc.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin panel in Django 0.96 allows remote attackers to change passwords of arbitrary users via a request to admin/auth/user/1/password/. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by Debian, since product documentation includes a recommendation for a CSRF protection module that is included with the product. However, CVE considers this an issue because the default configuration does not use this module

Various Vembu products allow an attacker to execute a (non-blind) http-only Cross Site Request Forgery (Other products or versions of products in this family may be affected too.)

A remote unauthenticated cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability was discovered in Aruba AirWave Management Platform version(s): Prior to 8.2.12.0. A vulnerability in the AirWave web-based management interface could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack against a vulnerable system. A successful exploit would consist of an attacker persuading an authorized user to follow a malicious link, resulting in arbitrary actions being carried out with the privilege level of the targeted user.

An issue was discovered in MDaemon before 20.0.4. Remote Administration allows an attacker to perform a fixation of the anti-CSRF token. In order to exploit this issue, the user has to click on a malicious URL provided by the attacker and successfully authenticate into the application. Having the value of the anti-CSRF token, the attacker may trick the user into visiting his malicious page and performing any request with the privileges of attacked user.

Umbraco before 7.4.0 allows remote attackers to bypass anti-forgery security measures and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks as demonstrated by editing user account information in the templates.asmx.cs file.

Edimax Wi-Fi Extender devices allow goform/formwlencryptvxd CSRF with resultant PSK key disclosure.

The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in a connection test form method in Jenkins Maven Release Plugin 0.16.1 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins connect to an attacker specified web server and parse XML documents.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Build Failure Analyzer Plugin 1.24.1 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins evaluate a computationally expensive regular expression.

Textpattern CMS 4.6.2 allows CSRF via the prefs subsystem.

Xovis PC2, PC2R, and PC3 devices through 3.6.0 allow CSRF.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

The request phase of the OmniAuth Ruby gem (1.9.1 and earlier) is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery when used as part of the Ruby on Rails framework, allowing accounts to be connected without user intent, user interaction, or feedback to the user. This permits a secondary account to be able to sign into the web application as the primary account.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web-management interface in the fabric interconnect (FI) component in Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCtg20755.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins RapidDeploy Plugin 4.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified web server.

An issue was discovered in SeaCMS 6.61. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an admin account via adm1n/admin_manager.php?action=save&id=2.

AXIS Communications products allow CSRF, as demonstrated by admin/pwdgrp.cgi, vaconfig.cgi, and admin/local_del.cgi.

The photo-gallery plugin before 1.2.42 for WordPress has CSRF.

A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web UI on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. If the user has administrative privileges, the attacker could alter the configuration, execute commands, or reload an affected device.

MITRE is populating this ID because it was assigned prior to Lenovo becoming a CNA. A vulnerability was discovered (fixed and publicly disclosed in 2015) in Lenovo Solution Center (LSC) prior to version 3.3.002 that could allow cross-site request forgery.

In Calibre-web, versions 0.6.0 to 0.6.13 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). By luring an authenticated user to click on a link, an attacker can create a new user role with admin privileges and attacker-controlled credentials, allowing them to take over the application.

TuziCMS 2.0.6 has index.php/manage/notice/do_add CSRF.

The Post Snippets WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not have CSRF check when importing files, allowing attacker to make a logged In admin import arbitrary snippets. Furthermore, imported snippers are not sanitised and escaped, which could lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

6kbbs 7.1 and 8.0 allows CSRF via portalchannel_ajax.php (id or code parameter) or admin.php (fileids parameter).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Drag & Drop Gallery module 6.x for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

In OpenNMS Horizon, versions opennms-1-0-stable through opennms-27.1.0-1; OpenNMS Meridian, versions meridian-foundation-2015.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2019.1.18-1; meridian-foundation-2020.1.0-1 through meridian-foundation-2020.1.6-1 are vulnerable to CSRF, due to no CSRF protection at `/opennms/admin/userGroupView/users/updateUser`. This flaw allows assigning `ROLE_ADMIN` security role to a normal user. Using this flaw, an attacker can trick the admin user to assign administrator privileges to a normal user by enticing him to click upon an attacker-controlled website.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/ajax/appconfig.php in ownCloud before 4.0.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that edit the app configurations.

The wp-google-map-plugin plugin before 2.3.10 for WordPress has CSRF in the add/edit category feature.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the com_templates component in Joomla! 3.2.0 through 3.3.x and 3.4.x before 3.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

The Formidable Form Builder WordPress plugin before 4.09.05 allows to inject certain HTML Tags like <audio>,<video>,<img>,<a> and<button>.This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exploit a HTML-injection byinjecting a malicous link. The HTML-injection may trick authenticated users to follow the link. If the Link gets clicked, Javascript code can be executed. The vulnerability is due to insufficient sanitization of the "data-frmverify" tag for links in the web-based entry inspection page of affected systems. A successful exploitation incomibantion with CSRF could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected system with the privileges of the user. These actions include stealing the users account by changing their password or allowing attackers to submit their own code through an authenticated user resulting in Remote Code Execution. If an authenticated user who is able to edit Wordpress PHP Code in any kind, clicks the malicious link, PHP code can be edited.