Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2019-9153

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-22 Aug, 2019 | 15:30
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected At-
Credits

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to forge signed messages by replacing its signatures with a "standalone" or "timestamp" signature.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:22 Aug, 2019 | 15:30
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 21:38
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to forge signed messages by replacing its signatures with a "standalone" or "timestamp" signature.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-openpgp-js/
x_refsource_MISC
https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/Mailvelope_Extensions/Mailvelope_Extensions_pdf.html#download=1
x_refsource_MISC
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases/tag/v4.2.0
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/816
x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/797/commits/327d3e5392a6f59a4270569d200c7f7a2bfc4cbc
x_refsource_CONFIRM
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154191/OpenPGP.js-4.2.0-Signature-Bypass-Invalid-Curve-Attack.html
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-openpgp-js/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/Mailvelope_Extensions/Mailvelope_Extensions_pdf.html#download=1
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases/tag/v4.2.0
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/816
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/797/commits/327d3e5392a6f59a4270569d200c7f7a2bfc4cbc
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154191/OpenPGP.js-4.2.0-Signature-Bypass-Invalid-Curve-Attack.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-openpgp-js/
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/Mailvelope_Extensions/Mailvelope_Extensions_pdf.html#download=1
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases/tag/v4.2.0
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/816
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/797/commits/327d3e5392a6f59a4270569d200c7f7a2bfc4cbc
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154191/OpenPGP.js-4.2.0-Signature-Bypass-Invalid-Curve-Attack.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-openpgp-js/
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/Mailvelope_Extensions/Mailvelope_Extensions_pdf.html#download=1
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases/tag/v4.2.0
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/816
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/797/commits/327d3e5392a6f59a4270569d200c7f7a2bfc4cbc
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154191/OpenPGP.js-4.2.0-Signature-Bypass-Invalid-Curve-Attack.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:22 Aug, 2019 | 16:15
Updated At:30 Aug, 2019 | 12:52

Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature in OpenPGP.js <=4.1.2 allows an attacker to forge signed messages by replacing its signatures with a "standalone" or "timestamp" signature.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.07.5HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.0
Base score: 7.5
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

openpgpjs
openpgpjs
>>openpgpjs>>Versions up to 4.1.2(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openpgpjs:openpgpjs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154191/OpenPGP.js-4.2.0-Signature-Bypass-Invalid-Curve-Attack.htmlcve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/797/commits/327d3e5392a6f59a4270569d200c7f7a2bfc4cbccve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/816cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases/tag/v4.2.0cve@mitre.org
Release Notes
https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-openpgp-js/cve@mitre.org
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/Mailvelope_Extensions/Mailvelope_Extensions_pdf.html#download=1cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154191/OpenPGP.js-4.2.0-Signature-Bypass-Invalid-Curve-Attack.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
VDB Entry
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/797/commits/327d3e5392a6f59a4270569d200c7f7a2bfc4cbc
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/816
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/releases/tag/v4.2.0
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://sec-consult.com/en/blog/advisories/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-openpgp-js/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Exploit
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/Mailvelope_Extensions/Mailvelope_Extensions_pdf.html#download=1
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

62Records found

CVE-2022-24772
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 25.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2022 | 13:30
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in `node-forge`

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code does not check for tailing garbage bytes after decoding a `DigestInfo` ASN.1 structure. This can allow padding bytes to be removed and garbage data added to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-digitalbazaardigitalbazaar
Product-forgeforge
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-23533
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:34
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 14:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 1.2.0, for web based versions contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-15957
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 41.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2020 | 13:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-dp3t-backend-software_development_kit_projectn/a
Product-dp3t-backend-software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-15093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2020 | 18:45
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper verification of signature threshold in tough

The tough library (Rust/crates.io) prior to version 0.7.1 does not properly verify the threshold of cryptographic signatures. It allows an attacker to duplicate a valid signature in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum threshold of unique signatures before the metadata is considered valid. A fix is available in version 0.7.1. CVE-2020-6174 is assigned to the same vulnerability in the TUF reference implementation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-amazonawslabs
Product-toughtough
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-14515
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Industrial Control Systems (ICS)
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 31.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Sep, 2020 | 19:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

CodeMeter (All versions prior to 6.90 when using CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code) has an issue in the license-file signature checking mechanism, which allows attackers to build arbitrary license files, including forging a valid license file as if it were a valid license file of an existing vendor. Only CmActLicense update files with CmActLicense Firm Code are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-wibun/a
Product-codemeterCodeMeter
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-14966
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 50.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jun, 2020 | 11:20
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:00
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the jsrsasign package through 8.0.18 for Node.js. It allows a malleability in ECDSA signatures by not checking overflows in the length of a sequence and '0' characters appended or prepended to an integer. The modified signatures are verified as valid. This could have a security-relevant impact if an application relied on a single canonical signature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-jsrsasign_projectn/aNetApp, Inc.
Product-max_datajsrsasignn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13101
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Aug, 2020 | 07:04
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In OASIS Digital Signature Services (DSS) 1.0, an attacker can control the validation outcome (i.e., trigger either a valid or invalid outcome for a valid or invalid signature) via a crafted XML signature, when the InlineXML option is used. This defeats the expectation of non-repudiation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-oasis-openn/a
Product-oasis_digital_signature_servicesn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-13415
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 33.52%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2020 | 20:48
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or is from a user who is not authorized to access Aviatrix), aka XML Signature Wrapping.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aAviatrix Systems, Inc.
Product-controllern/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-11093
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Dec, 2020 | 20:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authorization bypass in Hyperledger Indy

Hyperledger Indy Node is the server portion of a distributed ledger purpose-built for decentralized identity. In Hyperledger Indy before version 1.12.4, there is lack of signature verification on a specific transaction which enables an attacker to make certain unauthorized alterations to the ledger. Updating a DID with a nym transaction will be written to the ledger if neither ROLE or VERKEY are being changed, regardless of sender. A malicious DID with no particular role can ask an update for another DID (but cannot modify its verkey or role). This is bad because 1) Any DID can write a nym transaction to the ledger (i.e., any DID can spam the ledger with nym transactions), 2) Any DID can change any other DID's alias, 3) The update transaction modifies the ledger metadata associated with a DID.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-hyperledgerThe Linux Foundation
Product-indy-nodeindy-node
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-41831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.82% / 73.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 08:10
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 03:22
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Timestamp Manipulation with Signature Wrapping

It is possible for an attacker to manipulate the timestamp of signed documents. All versions of Apache OpenOffice up to 4.1.10 are affected. Users are advised to update to version 4.1.11. See CVE-2021-25634 for the LibreOffice advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-openofficeApache OpenOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2021-21405
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.17% / 38.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Apr, 2021 | 21:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
BLS Signature "Malleability"

Lotus is an Implementation of the Filecoin protocol written in Go. BLS signature validation in lotus uses blst library method VerifyCompressed. This method accepts signatures in 2 forms: "serialized", and "compressed", meaning that BLS signatures can be provided as either of 2 unique byte arrays. Lotus block validation functions perform a uniqueness check on provided blocks. Two blocks are considered distinct if the CIDs of their blockheader do not match. The CID method for blockheader includes the BlockSig of the block. The result of these issues is that it would be possible to punish miners for valid blocks, as there are two different valid block CIDs available for each block, even though this must be unique. By switching from the go based `blst` bindings over to the bindings in `filecoin-ffi`, the code paths now ensure that all signatures are compressed by size and the way they are deserialized. This happened in https://github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/pull/5393.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-filecoinfilecoin-project
Product-lotuslotus
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2020-36285
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.07%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2021 | 15:38
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Union Pay up to 3.3.12, for iOS mobile apps, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-unionpayintln/a
Product-union_payn/a
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found