Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zenoss Core through 5 Beta 3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger arbitrary code execution via a ZenPack upload, aka ZEN-15388.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CA Cloud Service Management (CSM) before Summer 2014 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Limit Posts Automatically plugin 0.7 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the lpa_post_letters parameter in the wp-limit-posts-automatically.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Portal 8.0.0 through 8.0.0.1 CF15 and 8.5.0 before CF05 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.
FrogCMS v0.9.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/?/snippet/delete/3.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in goform/Quick_setup on Cisco EPC3925 devices allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change a password via the Password and PasswordReEnter parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuh37496.
An issue was discovered in GreenCMS v2.3.0603. There is a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the content parameter to index.php?m=admin&c=media&a=fileconnect.
The setup resources in Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.1 allows remote attackers to complete the setup process via a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin 1.42.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.5, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186283.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the admin area in X3 CMS 0.5.1 and 0.5.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191391.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Php Scriptlerim Who's Who script allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators or requests that (1) add an admin account via a request to filepath/yonetim/plugin/adminsave.php or have unspecified impact via a request to (2) ayarsave.php, (3) uyesave.php, (4) slaytadd.php, or (5) slaytsave.php.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the PWGRandom plugin 1.11 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (1) pwgrandom_title or (2) pwgrandom_category parameter in the pwgrandom page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.17 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 175411.
IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.11 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191942.
IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.17 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 175410.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the twimp-wp plugin for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the message_format parameter in the twimp-wp.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Mikiurl Wordpress Eklentisi plugin 2.0 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (1) twitter_kullanici or (2) twitter_sifre parameter in a kaydet action in the mikiurl.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM UrbanCode Release 6.0.1.6 and earlier, 6.1.0.7 and earlier, and 6.1.1.1 and earlier.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Wp Unique Article Header Image plugin 1.0 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the (1) gt_default_header or (2) gt_homepage_header parameter in the wp-unique-header.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ClearQuest Web in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7.1.x before 7.1.2.17, 8.0.0.x before 8.0.0.14, and 8.0.1.x before 8.0.1.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger a logout or insert XSS sequences.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Oliver Seidel, Bastian Germann cformsII plugin <= 15.0.4 versions.
An issue was discovered in OneThink v1.1. There is a CSRF vulnerability in admin.php?s=/User/add.html that can add a user.
An issue was discovered in Auth0 auth0-aspnet and auth0-aspnet-owin. Affected packages do not use or validate the state parameter of the OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect protocols. This leaves applications vulnerable to CSRF attacks during authentication and authorization operations.
The facebook-for-woocommerce plugin before 1.9.14 for WordPress has CSRF.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Atmail Webmail Server before 7.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts, (2) modify user accounts, (3) delete user accounts, or (4) stop the product's service.
The Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.57. This is due to confusing logic functions missing or having incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain and perform otherwise unauthorized access and actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Strategy11 Form Builder Team Formidable Forms plugin <= 5.5.6 versions.
Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.x before 2.3.20 uses predictable <s:token/> values, which allows remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism.
An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint).
The administration panel of Jirafeau before 3.4.1 is vulnerable to three CSRF attacks on search functionalities: search_by_name, search_by_hash, and search_link.
HID OMNIKEY 5427 and OMNIKEY 5127 readers are vulnerable to CSRF when using the EEM driver (Ethernet Emulation Mode). By persuading an authenticated user to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could send a malformed HTTP request to upload a configuration file to the device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform cross-site scripting attacks, Web cache poisoning, and other malicious activities.
The WooCommerce Google Sheet Connector WordPress plugin before 1.3.6 does not have CSRF check when updating its Access Code, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin change the access code to an arbitrary one via a CSRF attack
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Joseph C Dolson My Calendar plugin <= 3.4.3 versions.
A vulnerability was found in destiny.gg chat. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function websocket.Upgrader of the file main.go. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is bebd256fc3063111fb4503ca25e005ebf6e73780. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216521 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Exinda WAN Optimization Suite 7.0.0 (2160) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the admin password via a request to admin/launch.
The Radio Buttons for Taxonomies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_single_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save terms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the LTI module in Moodle through 2.4.11, 2.5.x before 2.5.9, 2.6.x before 2.6.6, and 2.7.x before 2.7.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for a (1) mod/lti/request_tool.php or (2) mod/lti/instructor_edit_tool_type.php request.
An issue was discovered in the PageLayer plugin before 1.1.2 for WordPress. The pagelayer_settings_page function is vulnerable to CSRF, which can lead to XSS.
Coursemill Learning Management System (LMS) 6.8 constructs secret tokens based on time values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via vectors related to cookies, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3605.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CA Release Automation (formerly iTKO LISA Release Automation) before 4.7.1 b448 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
The Kali Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to incorrect nonce handling throughout the plugin's function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to access the plugin's administrative functions via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FlyCms 1.0 allows attackers to add arbitrary administrator accounts via system/admin/admin_save.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate application deployment via the POST method, as demonstrated by a /manager/html/undeploy?path= URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report, stating that "the Apache Tomcat Security team has not accepted any reports of CSRF attacks against the Manager application ... as they require a reckless system administrator.
themegrill-demo-importer before 1.6.3 allows CSRF, as demonstrated by wiping the database.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Openfiler 2.99.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shutdown or (2) reboot the server via a request to admin/system_shutdown.html.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LionScripts.Com LionScripts: IP Blocker Lite plugin <= 11.1.1 versions.
The Scheduler in Grav CMS through 1.7.0-rc.17 allows an attacker to execute a system command by tricking an admin into visiting a malicious website (CSRF).
OMERO before 5.0.6 has multiple CSRF vulnerabilities because the framework for OMERO's web interface lacks CSRF protection.