Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-15719

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-14 Jul, 2020 | 13:47
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:22
Rejected At-
Credits

libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:14 Jul, 2020 | 13:47
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 13:22
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070
x_refsource_MISC
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266
x_refsource_MISC
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674
x_refsource_MISC
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
x_refsource_MISC
https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
Hyperlink: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html
Resource:
vendor-advisory
x_refsource_SUSE
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:14 Jul, 2020 | 14:15
Updated At:12 May, 2022 | 15:01

libldap in certain third-party OpenLDAP packages has a certificate-validation flaw when the third-party package is asserting RFC6125 support. It considers CN even when there is a non-matching subjectAltName (SAN). This is fixed in, for example, openldap-2.4.46-10.el8 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.14.2MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Primary2.04.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 4.2
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 4.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

openldap
openldap
>>openldap>>Versions before 2.4.46-10.el8(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:openldap:openldap:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Red Hat, Inc.
redhat
>>enterprise_linux>>8.0
cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openSUSE
opensuse
>>leap>>15.1
cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap:15.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openSUSE
opensuse
>>leap>>15.2
cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap:15.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
McAfee, LLC
mcafee
>>policy_auditor>>Versions before 6.5.1(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:mcafee:policy_auditor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Oracle Corporation
oracle
>>blockchain_platform>>Versions before 21.1.2(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:oracle:blockchain_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.htmlcve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.htmlcve@mitre.org
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266cve@mitre.org
Permissions Required
Vendor Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070cve@mitre.org
Issue Tracking
Third Party Advisory
https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.htmlcve@mitre.org
Patch
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00033.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00059.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Mailing List
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3674
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Permissions Required
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740070
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Issue Tracking
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Patch
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

142Records found

CVE-2025-32989
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2025 | 08:05
Updated-12 May, 2026 | 13:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gnutls: vulnerability in gnutls sct extension parsing

A heap-buffer-overread vulnerability was found in GnuTLS in how it handles the Certificate Transparency (CT) Signed Certificate Timestamp (SCT) extension during X.509 certificate parsing. This flaw allows a malicious user to create a certificate containing a malformed SCT extension (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.11129.2.4.2) that contains sensitive data. This issue leads to the exposure of confidential information when GnuTLS verifies certificates from certain websites when the certificate (SCT) is not checked correctly.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Siemens AGGNU
Product-openshift_container_platformgnutlsenterprise_linuxRed Hat Insights proxy 1.5Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Ceph Storage 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Discovery 2Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP SolutionsSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8034
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-13.33% / 94.35%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-21 Oct, 2024 | 16:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The host name verification when using TLS with the WebSocket client was missing. It is now enabled by default. Versions Affected: Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.31, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.52, and 7.0.35 to 7.0.88.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Canonical Ltd.The Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-retail_order_brokerubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxtomcatApache Tomcat
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3698
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Mar, 2022 | 14:07
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Cockpit in versions prior to 260 in the way it handles the certificate verification performed by the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD). This flaw allows client certificates to authenticate successfully, regardless of the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) configuration or the certificate status. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cockpit-projectn/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-cockpitenterprise_linuxcockpit
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2006-7246
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 34.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2020 | 14:56
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 20:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

NetworkManager 0.9.x does not pin a certificate's subject to an ESSID when 802.11X authentication is used.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectSUSEopenSUSE
Product-opensuselinux_enterprise_servernetworkmanagerlinux_enterprise_desktopn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-16875
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.92% / 76.44%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The crypto/x509 package of Go before 1.10.6 and 1.11.x before 1.11.3 does not limit the amount of work performed for each chain verification, which might allow attackers to craft pathological inputs leading to a CPU denial of service. Go TLS servers accepting client certificates and TLS clients are affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]GoopenSUSE
Product-goleapgolang
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-34558
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.92% / 76.45%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2021 | 13:47
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 00:12
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The crypto/tls package of Go through 1.16.5 does not properly assert that the type of public key in an X.509 certificate matches the expected type when doing a RSA based key exchange, allowing a malicious TLS server to cause a TLS client to panic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Fedora ProjectGo
Product-fedoragocloud_insights_telegraftridenttimesten_in-memory_databasestoragegridn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-2422
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.32% / 55.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2023 | 10:59
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 06:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Keycloak: oauth client impersonation

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A Keycloak server configured to support mTLS authentication for OAuth/OpenID clients does not properly verify the client certificate chain. A client that possesses a proper certificate can authorize itself as any other client, therefore, access data that belongs to other clients.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-single_sign-onopenshift_container_platformkeycloakenterprise_linuxRed Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8RHEL-8 based Middleware ContainersRed Hat Single Sign-On 7
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 26.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11775
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 66.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_repositoryflexcube_private_bankingactivemqApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1664
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 49.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-15 Jan, 2025 | 22:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-migration_toolkit_for_runtimesbuild_of_quarkuskeycloaksingle_sign-onjboss_a-mqKeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-10894
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 17.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 07:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that SAML authentication in Keycloak 3.4.3.Final incorrectly authenticated expired certificates. A malicious user could use this to access unauthorized data or possibly conduct further attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-single_sign-onkeycloakenterprise_linuxkeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-1055
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 20.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-11 Mar, 2025 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-fedoradirectory_serverRed Hat Directory Server
CWE ID-CWE-200
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7562
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.46% / 64.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jul, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An authentication bypass flaw was found in the way krb5's certauth interface before 1.16.1 handled the validation of client certificates. A remote attacker able to communicate with the KDC could potentially use this flaw to impersonate arbitrary principals under rare and erroneous circumstances.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Red Hat, Inc.
Product-enterprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_workstationenterprise_linuxkerberos_5enterprise_linux_desktopkrb5
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2017-7513
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that Satellite 5 configured with SSL/TLS for the PostgreSQL backend failed to correctly validate X.509 server certificate host name fields. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof a PostgreSQL server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-satelliteRed Hat Satellite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-23632
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.56% / 68.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2022 | 14:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik skips the router TLS configuration when the host header is an FQDN

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikOracle Corporation
Product-traefikcommunications_unified_inventory_managementtraefik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6594
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.60%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Aug, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The transit path validation code in Heimdal before 7.3 might allow attackers to bypass the capath policy protection mechanism by leveraging failure to add the previous hop realm to the transit path of issued tickets.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heimdal_projectn/aopenSUSE
Product-leapheimdaln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-3563
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Oracle
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Oracle
CVSS Score-8.8||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 30.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Apr, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox component of Oracle Virtualization (subcomponent: Core). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 5.0.38 and Prior to 5.1.20. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle Corporation
Product-vm_virtualboxOracle VM VirtualBox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2639
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.25% / 48.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]Red Hat, Inc.
Product-cloudforms_management_enginecloudformsCloudForms
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2667
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Hammer CLI, a CLI utility for Foreman, before version 0.10.0, did not explicitly set the verify_ssl flag for apipie-bindings that disable it by default. As a result the server certificates are not checked and connections are prone to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.The Foreman
Product-hammer_clisatellitesatellite_capsuleHammer CLI
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2623
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.26% / 50.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 14:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rpm-ostreeProject AtomicRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rpm-ostree-clientrpm-ostreeenterprise_linuxrpm-ostree,
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10937
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 55.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Sep, 2019 | 15:07
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IMAPFilter through 2.6.12 does not validate the hostname in an SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-imapfilter_projectn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-debian_linuxfedoraimapfilterbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-0759
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 33.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Mar, 2022 | 18:03
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 23:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in all versions of kubeclient up to (but not including) v4.9.3, the Ruby client for Kubernetes REST API, in the way it parsed kubeconfig files. When the kubeconfig file does not configure custom CA to verify certs, kubeclient ends up accepting any certificate (it wrongly returns VERIFY_NONE). Ruby applications that leverage kubeclient to parse kubeconfig files are susceptible to Man-in-the-middle attacks (MITM).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-kubeclientkubeclient
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1000033
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.41% / 61.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Oct, 2016 | 14:00
Updated-06 May, 2026 | 22:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Shotwell version 0.22.0 (and possibly other versions) is vulnerable to a TLS/SSL certification validation flaw resulting in a potential for man in the middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME ProjectRed Hat, Inc.
Product-shotwellenterprise_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3552
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-3.1||LOW
EPSS-0.19% / 40.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2019 | 02:32
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In RHEV-M VDC 2.2.0, it was found that the SSL certificate was not verified when using the client-side Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager interface (a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) XAML browser application) to connect to the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager. An attacker on the local network could use this flaw to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack, tricking the user into thinking they are viewing the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager when the content is actually attacker-controlled, or modifying actions a user requested Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager to perform.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-enterprise_virtualization_managerRHEV-M VDC
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3636
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.03% / 9.49%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2021 | 19:27
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found in OpenShift, before version 4.8, that the generated certificate for the in-cluster Service CA, incorrectly included additional certificates. The Service CA is automatically mounted into all pods, allowing them to safely connect to trusted in-cluster services that present certificates signed by the trusted Service CA. The incorrect inclusion of additional CAs in this certificate would allow an attacker that compromises any of the additional CAs to masquerade as a trusted in-cluster service.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-openshiftopenshift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CVE-2021-22926
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 71.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-28 May, 2026 | 21:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Siemens AGCURLSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-h300s_firmwareh500emysql_serverhci_management_nodeoncommand_workflow_automationh700esolidfireh410s_firmwareh700e_firmwareh700sh500e_firmwareh300e_firmwareh700s_firmwareh500s_firmwaresinec_infrastructure_network_servicesh500scurlpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsh300eh300sh410sclustered_data_ontapsnapcenteroncommand_insightuniversal_forwarderactive_iq_unified_managerhttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-4000
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-92.35% / 99.74%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 May, 2015 | 00:00
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 17:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationMicrosoft CorporationMozilla CorporationCanonical Ltd.OpenSSLApple Inc.HP Inc.SUSEGoogle LLCIBM CorporationDebian GNU/LinuxOpera
Product-mac_os_xnetwork_security_servicesinternet_explorercontent_managerfirefox_osjrockitjdkseamonkeyiphone_osdebian_linuxsparc-opl_service_processorchromesuse_linux_enterprise_serverfirefoxsafariubuntu_linuxhp-uxlinux_enterprise_software_development_kitthunderbirdopensslfirefox_esrlinux_enterprise_desktoplinux_enterprise_serverjreopera_browsern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-4740
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.2||HIGH
EPSS-0.01% / 1.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 14:30
Updated-28 May, 2026 | 13:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Rhacm: open cluster management (ocm): cross-cluster privilege escalation via improper kubernetes client certificate renewal validation

A flaw was found in Open Cluster Management (OCM), the technology underlying Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (ACM). Improper validation of Kubernetes client certificate renewal allows a managed cluster administrator to forge a client certificate that can be approved by the OCM controller. This enables cross-cluster privilege escalation and may allow an attacker to gain control over other managed clusters, including the hub cluster.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetesMulticluster Engine for Kubernetes
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-22939
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.12% / 31.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationNetApp, Inc.Siemens AGDebian GNU/Linux
Product-sinec_infrastructure_network_servicespeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clusternextgen_apijd_edwards_enterpriseone_toolsnode.jsNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-3152
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-39.69% / 97.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2016 | 10:00
Updated-06 May, 2026 | 22:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMariaDB FoundationOracle CorporationRed Hat, Inc.The PHP GroupDebian GNU/LinuxFedora Project
Product-enterprise_linux_eusdebian_linuxmysql_connector\/centerprise_linux_serverenterprise_linux_workstationphpmariadbmysqlenterprise_linux_desktopenterprise_linux_server_tusenterprise_linux_server_ausfedoran/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2015-1777
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Apr, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 04:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

rhnreg_ks in Red Hat Network Client Tools (aka rhn-client-tools) on Red Hat Gluster Storage 2.1 and Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5, 6, and 7 does not properly validate hostnames in X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows remote attackers to prevent system registration via a man-in-the-middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-rhn-client-toolsgluster_storageenterprise_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-8286
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Dec, 2020 | 19:39
Updated-15 Nov, 2024 | 15:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle CorporationSiemens AGSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)Apple Inc.CURLFedora Project
Product-libcurlpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolscommunications_billing_and_revenue_managementhci_storage_nodehci_storage_node_firmwarehci_bootstrap_osmacosuniversal_forwarderhci_compute_nodecommunications_cloud_native_core_policysolidfiresinec_infrastructure_network_servicesclustered_data_ontapsimatic_tim_1531_irc_firmwaredebian_linuxessbasehci_management_nodefedoramac_os_xsimatic_tim_1531_irchttps://github.com/curl/curl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9488
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.04% / 11.39%
||
7 Day CHG+0.01%
Published-27 Apr, 2020 | 15:36
Updated-29 May, 2026 | 18:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Apache Log4j SMTP appender. This could allow an SMTPS connection to be intercepted by a man-in-the-middle attack which could leak any log messages sent through that appender. Fixed in Apache Log4j 2.12.3 and 2.13.1

Action-Not Available
Vendor-qosOracle CorporationThe Apache Software FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-enterprise_manager_for_peoplesoftcommunications_application_session_controllercommunications_eagle_ftp_table_base_retrievalfinancial_services_analytical_applications_infrastructurefinancial_services_institutional_performance_analyticspolicy_automation_connector_for_siebelspatial_and_graphsiebel_ui_frameworkoracle_goldengate_application_adapterspolicy_automationfinancial_services_retail_customer_analyticsinsurance_rules_paletteretail_xstore_point_of_serviceutilities_frameworkweblogic_serverflexcube_private_bankingflexcube_core_bankinginsurance_policy_administration_j2eecommunications_unified_inventory_managementpolicy_automation_for_mobile_devicesretail_order_broker_cloud_servicereload4jretail_integration_buslog4jjd_edwards_world_securitycommunications_services_gatekeeperretail_insights_cloud_service_suiteprimavera_unifierretail_advanced_inventory_planninginsurance_insbridge_rating_and_underwritingretail_assortment_planningretail_customer_management_and_segmentation_foundationretail_bulk_data_integrationdebian_linuxhealth_sciences_information_managerfinancial_services_price_creation_and_discoverystoragetek_tape_analytics_sw_tooldata_integratorfinancial_services_market_risk_measurement_and_managementpeoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsstoragetek_acslsretail_predictive_application_servercommunications_billing_and_revenue_managementsiebel_apps_-_marketingretail_eftlinkcommunications_offline_mediation_controllerApache Log4j
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-7041
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.84% / 75.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 17:29
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because an X509_check_host negative error code is interpreted as a successful return value.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openfortivpn_projectn/aOpenSSLopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-opensslfedorabackports_sleopenfortivpnleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-8172
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.18% / 79.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2020 | 13:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:56
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS session reuse can lead to host certificate verification bypass in node version < 12.18.0 and < 14.4.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationNode.js (OpenJS Foundation)
Product-blockchain_platformgraalvmmysql_clusterbanking_extensibility_workbenchnode.jshttps://github.com/nodejs/node
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-7043
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.47% / 65.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL before 1.0.2. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because hostname comparisons do not consider '\0' characters, as demonstrated by a good.example.com\x00evil.example.com attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openfortivpn_projectn/aOpenSSLopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-opensslfedorabackports_sleopenfortivpnleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-7042
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.62% / 70.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Feb, 2020 | 17:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because the hostname check operates on uninitialized memory. The outcome is that a valid certificate is never accepted (only a malformed certificate may be accepted).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-openfortivpn_projectn/aOpenSSLopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-opensslfedorabackports_sleopenfortivpnleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-908
Use of Uninitialized Resource
CVE-2020-6529
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Chrome
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Chrome
CVSS Score-4.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.62% / 70.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jul, 2020 | 16:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Inappropriate implementation in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 84.0.4147.89 allowed an attacker in a privileged network position to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Google LLCopenSUSEFedora ProjectDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxchromefedorabackports_sleleapChrome
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-4320
Matching Score-6
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 38.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jun, 2020 | 13:45
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 20:58
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM MQ Appliance and IBM MQ AMQP Channels 8.0, 9.0 LTS, 9.1 LTS, and 9.1 CD do not correctly block or allow clients based on the certificate distinguished name SSLPEER setting. IBM X-Force ID: 177403.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft CorporationHP Inc.IBM CorporationLinux Kernel Organization, IncOracle Corporation
Product-solarislinux_kernelhp-uxwindowsmqaixMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-35509
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2022 | 15:53
Updated-30 Jun, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in keycloak affecting versions 11.0.3 and 12.0.0. An expired certificate would be accepted by the direct-grant authenticator because of missing time stamp validations. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-keycloakkeycloak
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-8007
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.32% / 55.40%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Aug, 2024 | 13:40
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 20:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Openstack-tripleo-common: rhosp director disables tls verification for registry mirrors

A flaw was found in the openstack-tripleo-common component of the Red Hat OpenStack Platform (RHOSP) director. This vulnerability allows an attacker to deploy potentially compromised container images via disabling TLS certificate verification for registry mirrors, which could enable a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-openstack_platformRed Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 8Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2003-1229
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.29% / 80.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Aug, 2005 | 04:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2026 | 00:27
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

X509TrustManager in (1) Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in SDK and JRE 1.4.0 through 1.4.0_01, (2) JSSE before 1.0.3, (3) Java Plug-in SDK and JRE 1.3.0 through 1.4.1, and (4) Java Web Start 1.0 through 1.2 incorrectly calls the isClientTrusted method when determining server trust, which results in improper validation of digital certificate and allows remote attackers to (1) falsely authenticate peers for SSL or (2) incorrectly validate signed JAR files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOracle CorporationSun Microsystems (Oracle Corporation)
Product-jssejrejava_web_startn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-26184
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.31% / 54.73%
||
7 Day CHG-0.06%
Published-01 Jun, 2022 | 14:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.5.1, contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Oracle CorporationDell Inc.
Product-bsafe_micro-edition-suitehttp_serversecurity_serviceweblogic_server_proxy_plug-inDell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-26117
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.69% / 72.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2020 | 03:30
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx and rfb/CSecurityTLS.java in TigerVNC before 1.11.0, viewers mishandle TLS certificate exceptions. They store the certificates as authorities, meaning that the owner of a certificate could impersonate any server after a client had added an exception.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tigervncn/aDebian GNU/LinuxopenSUSE
Product-tigervncdebian_linuxleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-8285
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 35.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Aug, 2024 | 21:10
Updated-20 Nov, 2025 | 20:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Kroxylicious: missing upstream kafka tls hostname verification

A flaw was found in Kroxylicious. When establishing the connection with the upstream Kafka server using a TLS secured connection, Kroxylicious fails to properly verify the server's hostname, resulting in an insecure connection. For a successful attack to be performed, the attacker needs to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack or compromise any external systems, such as DNS or network routing configuration. This issue is considered a high complexity attack, with additional high privileges required, as the attack would need access to the Kroxylicious configuration or a peer system. The result of a successful attack impacts both data integrity and confidentiality.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-kroxyliciousstreams for Apache KafkaStreams for Apache Kafka 2.8.0
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-25680
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.08% / 23.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2021 | 17:32
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A flaw was found in JBCS httpd in version 2.4.37 SP3, where it uses a back-end worker SSL certificate with the keystore file's ID is 'unknown'. The validation of the certificate whether CN and hostname are matching stopped working and allow connecting to the back-end work. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.
Product-jboss_core_services_httpdJBCS httpd
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-14039
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.43% / 63.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2020 | 15:43
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:32
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Go before 1.13.13 and 1.14.x before 1.14.5, Certificate.Verify may lack a check on the VerifyOptions.KeyUsages EKU requirements (if VerifyOptions.Roots equals nil and the installation is on Windows). Thus, X.509 certificate verification is incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoopenSUSE
Product-goleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13614
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 69.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2020 | 22:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in ssl.c in Axel before 2.17.8. The TLS implementation lacks hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-axel_projectn/aopenSUSEFedora Project
Product-fedoraaxelbackports_sleleapn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-13254
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-4.71% / 89.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2020 | 13:11
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 12:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.13 and 3.0 before 3.0.7. In cases where a memcached backend does not perform key validation, passing malformed cache keys could result in a key collision, and potential data leakage.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxCanonical Ltd.DjangoNetApp, Inc.Oracle CorporationFedora Project
Product-ubuntu_linuxdebian_linuxfedorazfs_storage_appliance_kitdjangosra_pluginsteelstore_cloud_integrated_storagen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-11580
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.25% / 48.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2020 | 20:03
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 11:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, accepts an arbitrary SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.Oracle CorporationPulse SecureLinux Kernel Organization, Inc
Product-solarislinux_kernelpulse_connect_securepulse_policy_securemacosn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found