Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-15813

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-17 Jul, 2020 | 18:05
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected At-
Credits

Graylog before 3.3.3 lacks SSL Certificate Validation for LDAP servers. It allows use of an external user/group database stored in LDAP. The connection configuration allows the usage of unencrypted, SSL- or TLS-secured connections. Unfortunately, the Graylog client code (in all versions that support LDAP) does not implement proper certificate validation (regardless of whether the "Allow self-signed certificates" option is used). Therefore, any attacker with the ability to intercept network traffic between a Graylog server and an LDAP server is able to redirect traffic to a different LDAP server (unnoticed by the Graylog server due to the lack of certificate validation), effectively bypassing Graylog's authentication mechanism.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:17 Jul, 2020 | 18:05
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 13:30
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Graylog before 3.3.3 lacks SSL Certificate Validation for LDAP servers. It allows use of an external user/group database stored in LDAP. The connection configuration allows the usage of unencrypted, SSL- or TLS-secured connections. Unfortunately, the Graylog client code (in all versions that support LDAP) does not implement proper certificate validation (regardless of whether the "Allow self-signed certificates" option is used). Therefore, any attacker with the ability to intercept network traffic between a Graylog server and an LDAP server is able to redirect traffic to a different LDAP server (unnoticed by the Graylog server due to the lack of certificate validation), effectively bypassing Graylog's authentication mechanism.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/issues/5906
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/issues/5906
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/issues/5906
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/issues/5906
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:17 Jul, 2020 | 19:15
Updated At:22 Jul, 2020 | 15:03

Graylog before 3.3.3 lacks SSL Certificate Validation for LDAP servers. It allows use of an external user/group database stored in LDAP. The connection configuration allows the usage of unencrypted, SSL- or TLS-secured connections. Unfortunately, the Graylog client code (in all versions that support LDAP) does not implement proper certificate validation (regardless of whether the "Allow self-signed certificates" option is used). Therefore, any attacker with the ability to intercept network traffic between a Graylog server and an LDAP server is able to redirect traffic to a different LDAP server (unnoticed by the Graylog server due to the lack of certificate validation), effectively bypassing Graylog's authentication mechanism.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.18.1HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary2.06.8MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 8.1
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 6.8
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CPE Matches

graylog
graylog
>>graylog>>Versions before 3.3.3(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:graylog:graylog:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/issues/5906cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog2-server/issues/5906
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

101Records found

CVE-2017-7322
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 66.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Mar, 2017 | 07:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The (1) update and (2) package-installation features in MODX Revolution 2.5.4-pl and earlier do not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and trigger the execution of arbitrary code via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-modxn/a
Product-modx_revolutionn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-5729
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Mar, 2019 | 17:34
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 20:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Splunk-SDK-Python before 1.6.6 does not properly verify untrusted TLS server certificates, which could result in man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSplunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-software_development_kitn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2784
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-4.18% / 88.24%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Apr, 2017 | 18:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable free of a stack pointer vulnerability exists in the x509 certificate parsing code of ARM mbed TLS before 1.3.19, 2.x before 2.1.7, and 2.4.x before 2.4.2. A specially crafted x509 certificate, when parsed by mbed TLS library, can cause an invalid free of a stack pointer leading to a potential remote code execution. In order to exploit this vulnerability, an attacker can act as either a client or a server on a network to deliver malicious x509 certificates to vulnerable applications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Arm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsmbed TLS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3935
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fedora Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fedora Project
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.27% / 50.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Nov, 2021 | 15:59
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 17:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

When PgBouncer is configured to use "cert" authentication, a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject arbitrary SQL queries when a connection is first established, despite the use of TLS certificate verification and encryption. This flaw affects PgBouncer versions prior to 1.16.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pgbouncern/aDebian GNU/LinuxRed Hat, Inc.Fedora Project
Product-pgbouncerdebian_linuxfedoraenterprise_linuxpgbouncer
CWE ID-CWE-89
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32152
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.47% / 63.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise lacked TLS cert validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communication by default

Splunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3685
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-SUSE
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 37.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Nov, 2019 | 09:30
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Missing TLS certificate validation for HTTPS connections in osc

Open Build Service before version 0.165.4 diddn't validate TLS certificates for HTTPS connections with the osc client binary

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Open Build ServiceopenSUSE
Product-open_build_serviceOpen Build Service
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-3460
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 44.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2021 | 20:41
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Motorola MH702x devices, prior to version 2.0.0.301, do not properly verify the server certificate during communication with the support server which could lead to the communication channel being accessible by an attacker.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Motorola Mobility LLC. (Lenovo Group Limited)
Product-mh702xmh702x_firmwareMH702x
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-31871
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2024 | 15:55
Updated-28 Jan, 2025 | 21:08
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Security Verify Access Appliance improper certificate validation

IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.7 could allow a malicious actor to conduct a man in the middle attack when deploying Python scripts due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 287306.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_verify_accessSecurity Verify Access Appliancesecurity_verify_access
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-31872
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Apr, 2024 | 15:51
Updated-28 Jan, 2025 | 21:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
IBM Security Verify Access Appliance missing certificate validation

IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.7 could allow a malicious actor to conduct a man in the middle attack when deploying Open Source scripts due to missing certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 287316.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_verify_accessSecurity Verify Access Appliancesecurity_verify_access
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-28872
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Internet Systems Consortium (ISC)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Internet Systems Consortium (ISC)
CVSS Score-8.9||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.00%
||
7 Day CHG-0.01%
Published-11 Jul, 2024 | 14:49
Updated-26 Mar, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect TLS certificate validation can lead to escalated privileges

The TLS certificate validation code is flawed. An attacker can obtain a TLS certificate from the Stork server and use it to connect to the Stork agent. Once this connection is established with the valid certificate, the attacker can send malicious commands to a monitored service (Kea or BIND 9), possibly resulting in confidential data loss and/or denial of service. It should be noted that this vulnerability is not related to BIND 9 or Kea directly, and only customers using the Stork management tool are potentially affected. This issue affects Stork versions 0.15.0 through 1.15.0.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
Product-storkStork
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-13083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Oct, 2017 | 13:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Akeo Consulting Rufus prior to version 2.17.1187 does not adequately validate the integrity of updates downloaded over HTTP, allowing an attacker to easily convince a user to execute arbitrary code

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rufus_projectAkeo Consulting
Product-rufusRufus
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-345
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-494
Download of Code Without Integrity Check
CVE-2002-0862
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-20.15% / 95.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2002 | 04:00
Updated-03 Apr, 2025 | 01:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The (1) CertGetCertificateChain, (2) CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy, and (3) WinVerifyTrust APIs within the CryptoAPI for Microsoft products including Microsoft Windows 98 through XP, Office for Mac, Internet Explorer for Mac, and Outlook Express for Mac, do not properly verify the Basic Constraints of intermediate CA-signed X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof the certificates of trusted sites via a man-in-the-middle attack for SSL sessions, as originally reported for Internet Explorer and IIS.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMicrosoft CorporationApple Inc.
Product-windows_98sewindows_ntoutlook_expressmacoswindows_xpofficewindows_2000windows_98internet_explorerwindows_men/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-2048
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HashiCorp Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HashiCorp Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Mar, 2024 | 19:56
Updated-06 Aug, 2025 | 14:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Vault Cert Auth Method Did Not Correctly Validate Non-CA Certificates

Vault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”) TLS certificate auth method did not correctly validate client certificates when configured with a non-CA certificate as trusted certificate. In this configuration, an attacker may be able to craft a malicious certificate that could be used to bypass authentication. Fixed in Vault 1.15.5 and 1.14.10.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-HashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultVault EnterpriseVaultvault_enterprisevault
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-1471
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-9.9||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.32% / 54.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Mar, 2021 | 20:07
Updated-08 Nov, 2024 | 23:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Jabber Desktop and Mobile Client Software Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Jabber for Windows, Cisco Jabber for MacOS, and Cisco Jabber for mobile platforms could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary programs on the underlying operating system with elevated privileges, access sensitive information, intercept protected network traffic, or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-jabberCisco Jabber
CWE ID-CWE-170
Improper Null Termination
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-8156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-7||HIGH
EPSS-0.26% / 49.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 May, 2020 | 13:01
Updated-20 Nov, 2024 | 14:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A missing verification of the TLS host in Nextcloud Mail 1.1.3 allowed a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFedora ProjectNextcloud GmbH
Product-mailfedoraNextcloud Mail
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32563
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-9.8||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.40% / 60.16%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jun, 2022 | 11:57
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 07:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2. Admin credentials are not verified when using X.509 client-certificate authentication from Sync Gateway to Couchbase Server. When Sync Gateway is configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials provided to the Admin REST API are ignored, resulting in privilege escalation for unauthenticated users. The Public REST API is not impacted by this issue. A workaround is to replace X.509 certificate based authentication with Username and Password authentication inside the bootstrap configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-sync_gatewayn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-2408
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.69% / 81.46%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Jul, 2009 | 19:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 05:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.12.3, Firefox before 3.0.13, Thunderbird before 2.0.0.23, and SeaMonkey before 1.1.18 do not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority. NOTE: this was originally reported for Firefox before 3.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aSUSEDebian GNU/LinuxMozilla CorporationopenSUSECanonical Ltd.
Product-ubuntu_linuxlinux_enterprise_serverthunderbirddebian_linuxfirefoxopensusenetwork_security_serviceslinux_enterpriseseamonkeyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-6680
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitLab Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 5.39%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Dec, 2023 | 16:02
Updated-29 Aug, 2024 | 15:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Certificate Validation in GitLab

An improper certificate validation issue in Smartcard authentication in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.6 prior to 16.4.4, 16.5 prior to 16.5.4, and 16.6 prior to 16.6.2 allows an attacker to authenticate as another user given their public key if they use Smartcard authentication. Smartcard authentication is an experimental feature and has to be manually enabled by an administrator.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-GitLab Inc.
Product-gitlabGitLab
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1590
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.68% / 70.71%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2019 | 14:50
Updated-20 Nov, 2024 | 17:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches Application Centric Infrastructure Mode Insecure Fabric Authentication Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificate validation functionality of Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) Mode Switch Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform insecure TLS client authentication on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient TLS client certificate validations for certificates sent between the various components of an ACI fabric. An attacker who has possession of a certificate that is trusted by the Cisco Manufacturing CA and the corresponding private key could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a valid certificate while attempting to connect to the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to gain full control of all other components within the ACI fabric of an affected device.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-nexus_93180lc-exnexus_9348gc-fxpnexus_9332pqnexus_93108tc-exnexus_9272qnexus_9396pxnx-osnexus_9372pxnexus_9508nexus_93120txnexus_92304qcnexus_92160yc-xnexus_93128txnexus_93240yc-fx2nexus_93180yc-fxnexus_9000nexus_9372txnexus_9372tx-enexus_93108tc-fxnexus_93180yc-exnexus_9372px-enexus_9396txnexus_9336pqnexus_9332cnexus_9236cnexus_9364cnexus_92300ycnexus_9336c-fx2Cisco NX-OS Software for Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches ACI Mode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-15525
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 50.75%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2019 | 15:20
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

There is Missing SSL Certificate Validation in the pw3270 terminal emulator before version 5.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pw3270_projectn/a
Product-pw3270n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38355
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-3.17% / 86.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MiniTool Movie Maker 7.0 contains an insecure installation process that allows attackers to achieve remote code execution through a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-minitooln/a
Product-movie_makern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38354
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-3.17% / 86.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 17:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MiniTool Shadow Maker version 4.1 contains an insecure installation process that allows attackers to achieve remote code execution through a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-minitooln/a
Product-shadowmakern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38356
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-3.17% / 86.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 15:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MiniTool Power Data Recovery 11.6 contains an insecure installation process that allows attackers to achieve remote code execution through a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-minitooln/a
Product-power_data_recoveryn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-38352
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-3.17% / 86.43%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Sep, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-25 Sep, 2024 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MiniTool Partition Wizard 12.8 contains an insecure update mechanism that allows attackers to achieve remote code execution through a man in the middle attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-minitooln/a
Product-partition_wizardn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-48427
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.08% / 23.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Dec, 2023 | 11:27
Updated-25 Nov, 2024 | 21:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 2). Affected products do not properly validate the certificate of the configured UMC server. This could allow an attacker to intercept credentials that are sent to the UMC server as well as to manipulate responses, potentially allowing an attacker to escalate privileges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinec_insSINEC INS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000256
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.87% / 74.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-31 Oct, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libvirt version 2.3.0 and later is vulnerable to a bad default configuration of "verify-peer=no" passed to QEMU by libvirt resulting in a failure to validate SSL/TLS certificates by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aRed Hat, Inc.Debian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibvirtn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-34143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.10%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jul, 2023 | 02:03
Updated-21 Oct, 2024 | 18:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Validation of Certificate Vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager

Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager on Windows, Linux (Device Manager Server, Device Manager Agent, Host Data Collector components) allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Hitachi Device Manager: before 8.8.5-02.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, IncHitachi, Ltd.Microsoft Corporation
Product-windowsdevice_managerlinux_kernelHitachi Device Manager
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-35142
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.05% / 14.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2023 | 12:53
Updated-02 Jan, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins Checkmarx Plugin 2022.4.3 and earlier disables SSL/TLS validation for connections to the Checkmarx server by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-checkmarxJenkins Checkmarx Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-31486
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.45% / 62.64%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-30 Jan, 2025 | 20:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HTTP::Tiny before 0.083, a Perl core module since 5.13.9 and available standalone on CPAN, has an insecure default TLS configuration where users must opt in to verify certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-perlhttp\n/a
Product-\perln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-8479
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-5.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.65% / 69.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Sep, 2018 | 00:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A spoofing vulnerability exists for the Azure IoT Device Provisioning for the C SDK library using the HTTP protocol on Windows platform, aka "Azure IoT SDK Spoofing Vulnerability." This affects C SDK.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-c_software_development_kitjava_software_development_kitC SDK
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-23632
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.55% / 66.77%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2022 | 14:55
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Traefik skips the router TLS configuration when the host header is an FQDN

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-traefiktraefikOracle Corporation
Product-traefikcommunications_unified_inventory_managementtraefik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-6827
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 64.68%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-09 Feb, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

VOBOT CLOCK before 0.99.30 devices do not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via a crafted certificate, as demonstrated by leveraging a hardcoded --no-check-certificate Wget option.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-omninovan/a
Product-vobot_firmwarevobotn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4015
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 41.68%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Dec, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An exploitable vulnerability exists in the HTTP client functionality of the Webroot BrightCloud SDK. The configuration of the HTTP client does not enforce a secure connection by default, resulting in a failure to validate TLS certificates. An attacker could impersonate a remote BrightCloud server to exploit this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-webrootn/a
Product-brightcloudWebroot
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22642
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 26.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Apr, 2023 | 16:07
Updated-23 Oct, 2024 | 14:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, 6.4.8 through 6.4.10 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and the remote FortiGuard server hosting outbreakalert ressources.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortianalyzerfortimanagerFortiManagerFortiAnalyzer
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-31853
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 6.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jul, 2025 | 10:34
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 16:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM TOOLBOX II (All versions < V07.11). During establishment of a https connection to the TLS server of a managed device, the affected application doesn't check the extended key usage attribute of that device's certificate. This could allow an attacker to execute an on-path network (MitM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sicam_toolbox_iiSICAM TOOLBOX II
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-31489
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.06% / 20.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2024 | 14:37
Updated-20 Sep, 2024 | 19:41
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

AAn improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, FortiClientLinux 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 and FortiClientMac 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiGate and the FortiClient during the ZTNA tunnel creation

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-forticlientFortiClientLinuxFortiClientMacFortiClientEMSFortiClientWindowsforticlientwindowsforticlientlinuxforticlientmac
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-31854
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.7||HIGH
EPSS-0.03% / 6.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jul, 2025 | 10:34
Updated-20 Aug, 2025 | 16:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM TOOLBOX II (All versions < V07.11). During establishment of a https connection to the TLS server of a managed device, the affected application doesn't check device's certificate common name against an expected value. This could allow an attacker to execute an on-path network (MitM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sicam_toolbox_iiSICAM TOOLBOX II
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-30020
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-4.28% / 88.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 May, 2024 | 16:57
Updated-27 Aug, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Cryptographic Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Windows Cryptographic Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_22h2windows_10_21h2windows_server_2022_23h2windows_11_21h2windows_server_2016windows_10_1809windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_10_1507windows_server_2008windows_server_2012windows_11_23h2Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2016Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 1809Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1Windows Server 2012 R2Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 version 21H2Windows 11 version 22H3
CWE ID-CWE-122
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36658
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-28 Mar, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Apache::Session::LDAP before 0.5, validity of the X.509 certificate is not checked by default when connecting to remote LDAP backends, because the default configuration of the Net::LDAPS module for Perl is used. NOTE: this can, for example, be fixed in conjunction with the CVE-2020-16093 fix.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lemonldap-ngn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-apache\debian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-4895
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.06% / 19.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Feb, 2023 | 02:03
Updated-07 Mar, 2025 | 18:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Man-in-the-middle attack Vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Analytics probe component), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Analyzer probe component) allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.1-00.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Linux Kernel Organization, IncHitachi, Ltd.
Product-infrastructure_analytics_advisorlinux_kernelops_center_analyzerHitachi Ops Center AnalyzerHitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-7075
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 51.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 01:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that Kubernetes as used by Openshift Enterprise 3 did not correctly validate X.509 client intermediate certificate host name fields. An attacker could use this flaw to bypass authentication requirements by using a specially crafted X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.Kubernetes
Product-kubernetesopenshiftOpenShift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-7171
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.6||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.18% / 39.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Dec, 2016 | 18:00
Updated-12 Apr, 2025 | 10:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

NetApp Plug-in for Symantec NetBackup prior to version 2.0.1 makes use of a non-unique server certificate, making it vulnerable to impersonation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aNetApp, Inc.
Product-netapp_plug-inn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-23546
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Talos
CVSS Score-4.2||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 33.55%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Jul, 2023 | 14:53
Updated-02 Aug, 2024 | 10:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A misconfiguration vulnerability exists in the urvpn_client functionality of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5. A specially-crafted man-in-the-middle attack can lead to increased privileges. An attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack to trigger this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Milesight
Product-ur32l_firmwareur32lUR32L
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-5367
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 51.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jun, 2020 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax versions prior to 9.1.0.17, Dell EMC Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance versions prior to 9.1.0.17, and PowerMax OS Release 5978 contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack by supplying a crafted certificate and intercepting the victim's traffic to view or modify a victim's data in transit.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_unisphere_for_powermaxpowermax_osemc_unisphere_for_powermax_virtual_applianceUnisphere for PowerMax, Unisphere for PowerMax Virtual Appliance, PowerMax OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36659
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.12% / 32.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Jan, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-03 Apr, 2025 | 13:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Apache::Session::Browseable before 1.3.6, validity of the X.509 certificate is not checked by default when connecting to remote LDAP backends, because the default configuration of the Net::LDAPS module for Perl is used. NOTE: this can, for example, be fixed in conjunction with the CVE-2020-16093 fix.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-lemonldap-ngn/aDebian GNU/Linux
Product-apache\debian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-41243
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Jenkins Project
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.09% / 26.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Sep, 2022 | 15:46
Updated-28 May, 2025 | 15:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Jenkins SmallTest Plugin 1.0.4 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured View26 server that could be abused using a man-in-the-middle attack to intercept these connections.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Jenkins
Product-smalltestJenkins SmallTest Plugin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1148
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.46% / 62.92%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-21 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Akerun - Smart Lock Robot App for iOS before 1.2.4 does not verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-photosynthn/a
Product-akerunn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-33684
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.15% / 36.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Nov, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-02 May, 2025 | 19:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache Pulsar C++/Python OAuth Clients prior to 3.0.0 were vulnerable to an MITM attack due to Disabled Certificate Validation

The Apache Pulsar C++ Client does not verify peer TLS certificates when making HTTPS calls for the OAuth2.0 Client Credential Flow, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a man in the middle attack and intercept and/or modify the GET request that is sent to the ClientCredentialFlow 'issuer url'. The intercepted credentials can be used to acquire authentication data from the OAuth2.0 server to then authenticate with an Apache Pulsar cluster. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. The Apache Pulsar Python Client wraps the C++ client, so it is also vulnerable in the same way. This issue affects Apache Pulsar C++ Client and Python Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0 to 2.10.1; 2.6.4 and earlier. Any users running affected versions of the C++ Client or the Python Client should rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials, including client_id and client_secret. 2.7 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.7.5 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.8 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.8.4 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.9 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.9.3 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.10 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.10.2 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 3.0 C++ users are unaffected and 3.0 Python Client users will be unaffected when it is released. Any users running the C++ and Python Client for 2.6 or less should upgrade to one of the above patched versions.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-pulsarApache Pulsar
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-10931
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Aug, 2019 | 12:00
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in the openssl crate before 0.9.0 for Rust. There is an SSL/TLS man-in-the-middle vulnerability because certificate verification is off by default and there is no API for hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-rust-openssl_projectn/a
Product-rust-openssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:48
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise lacked TLS host name validation

Splunk Enterprise peers in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203 did not validate the TLS certificates during Splunk-to-Splunk communications by default. Splunk peer communications configured properly with valid certificates were not vulnerable. However, an attacker with administrator credentials could add a peer without a valid certificate and connections from misconfigured nodes without valid certificates did not fail by default. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-297
Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
Details not found