A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Fortify on Demand Plugin 5.0.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to the globally configured Fortify on Demand endpoint using attacker-specified credentials IDs.

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Olate Download (od) 3.4.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the PHP_SELF variable in modules/core/uim.php and (2) [url] tags in a comment in modules/core/fldm.php.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in PHPMyWind 5.6 which allows attackers to create a new administrator account without authentication.

The Event Registration Calendar By vcita plugin, versions up to and including 3.9.1, and Online Payments – Get Paid with PayPal, Square & Stripe plugin, for WordPress are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ls_parse_vcita_callback() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Contact Form Builder by vcita plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.9.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ls_parse_vcita_callback function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the t3lib_div::quoteJSvalue API function in TYPO3 4.0.13 and earlier, 4.1.x before 4.1.13, 4.2.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3beta2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to the sanitizing algorithm.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in MipCMS v5.0.1 allows attackers to arbitrarily add users via index.php?s=/user/ApiAdminUser/itemAdd.

The CRM and Lead Management by vcita plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.6.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the vcita-callback.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Contact Form and Calls To Action by vcita plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.6.4. This is due to missing nonce validation in the vcita-callback.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

EC Cloud E-Commerce System v1.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily add admin accounts via /admin.html?do=user&act=add.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in /admin/maintenance/ of Domainmod 4.13 allows attackers to arbitrarily delete logs.

White Shark System (WSS) 1.3.2 is vulnerable to CSRF. Attackers can use the user_edit_password.php file to modify the user password.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in PbootCMS 1.3.2 allows attackers to change the password of a user.

The Cache Images WordPress plugin before 3.2.1 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make any logged user upload images via a CSRF attack.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM NCC-EWF100RMWH2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.

The AI ChatBot WordPress plugin before 4.4.9 does not have authorisation and CSRF in a function hooked to init, allowing unauthenticated users to update some settings, leading to Stored XSS due to the lack of escaping when outputting them in the admin dashboard

The Name Directory WordPress plugin before 1.25.4 does not have CSRF check when importing names, and is also lacking sanitisation as well as escaping in some of the imported data, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin import arbitrary names with XSS payloads in them.

Hoosk Codeigniter CMS before 1.7.2 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). When an attacker induces authenticated admin user to a malicious web page, any accounts can be deleted without admin user's intention.

The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the token setting and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in puppyCMS v5.1 that can change the admin's password via /admin/settings.php.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThinkCMF v5.1.0, which can add an admin account.

CSRF in admin/edit-comments.php in Chadha PHPKB Standard Multi-Language 9 allows attackers to edit a comment, given the id, via a crafted request.

An issue was discovered in CMSUno before 1.6.1. uno.php allows CSRF to change the admin password.

The Tiempo.com WordPress plugin through 0.1.2 does not have CSRF check when creating and editing its shortcode, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

The Field Test gem 0.2.0 through 0.3.2 for Ruby allows CSRF.

The dynamic-widgets plugin before 1.5.11 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/themes.php?page=dynwid-config page_limit parameter.

In nodebb-plugin-blog-comments before version 0.7.0, a logged in user is vulnerable to an XSS attack which could allow a third party to post on their behalf on the forum. This is due to lack of CSRF validation.

CakePHP before 4.0.6 mishandles CSRF token generation. This might be remotely exploitable in conjunction with XSS.

The yith-maintenance-mode plugin before 1.2.0 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/themes.php?page=yith-maintenance-mode panel_page parameter.

The alpine-photo-tile-for-instagram plugin before 1.2.7.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/options-general.php?page=alpine-photo-tile-for-instagram-settings tab parameter.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Accept Donations with PayPal allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Accept Donations with PayPal: from n/a through 1.4.5.

nosurf is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection middleware for Go. A vulnerability in versions prior to 1.2.0 allows an attacker who controls content on the target site, or on a subdomain of the target site (either via XSS, or otherwise) to bypass CSRF checks and issue requests on user's behalf. Due to misuse of the Go `net/http` library, nosurf categorizes all incoming requests as plain-text HTTP requests, in which case the `Referer` header is not checked to have the same origin as the target webpage. If the attacker has control over HTML contents on either the target website (e.g. `example.com`), or on a website hosted on a subdomain of the target (e.g. `attacker.example.com`), they will also be able to manipulate cookies set for the target website. By acquiring the secret CSRF token from the cookie, or overriding the cookie with a new token known to the attacker, `attacker.example.com` is able to craft cross-site requests to `example.com`. A patch for the issue was released in nosurf 1.2.0. In lieu of upgrading to a patched version of nosurf, users may additionally use another HTTP middleware to ensure that a non-safe HTTP request is coming from the same origin (e.g. by requiring a `Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin` header in the request).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EC-CUBE plugin 'Mail Magazine Management Plugin' ver4.0.0 to 4.1.1 (for EC-CUBE 4 series) and ver1.0.0 to 1.0.4 (for EC-CUBE 3 series) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via a specially crafted page, and Mail Magazine Templates and/or transmitted history information may be deleted unintendedly.

Reflected Cross Site Scripting in Search Functionality of Module Library in Pandora FMS Console v766 and lower. This vulnerability arises on the forget password functionality in which parameter username does not proper input validation/sanitization thus results in executing malicious JavaScript payload.

The WP Customer Area WordPress plugin before 8.1.4 does not have CSRF checks when performing some actions such as chmod, mkdir and copy, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in admin perform them and create arbitrary folders, copy file for example.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /dede/article_keywords_main.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nickys Image Map Pro allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Image Map Pro: from n/a before 5.6.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPAssist.Me WordPress Countdown Widget allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects WordPress Countdown Widget: from n/a through 3.1.9.1.

The Simple Buttons Creator WordPress plugin through 1.04 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF in its add button function, allowing unauthenticated users to call them either directly or via CSRF attacks. Furthermore, due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also allow them to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against logged in admins.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /dede/templets_one_edit.php

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /dede/plus_edit.php.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in easy-popup-show all versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the administrator and to perform unintended operations if the administrator views a malicious page while logged in.

The FL3R FeelBox WordPress plugin through 8.1 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

Philips Clinical Collaboration Platform, Versions 12.2.1 and prior. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties required to process the data safely and correctly.

The Peter’s Collaboration E-mails WordPress plugin through 2.2.0 is vulnerable to CSRF due to missing nonce checks. This allows the change of its settings, which can be used to lower the required user level, change texts, the used email address and more.

The Coru LFMember WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when adding a new game, and is lacking sanitisation as well as escaping in their settings, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin add an arbitrary game with XSS payloads

The MyCSS WordPress plugin through 1.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The PDF24 Article To PDF WordPress plugin through 4.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The Discy WordPress theme before 5.2 does not check for CSRF tokens in the AJAX action discy_reset_options, allowing an attacker to trick an admin into resetting the site settings back to defaults.

The WP-Invoice WordPress plugin through 4.3.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, and is lacking sanitisation as well as escaping in some of them, allowing attacker to make a logged in admin change them and add XSS payload in them