Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-24025

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-11 Jan, 2021 | 18:14
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 15:05
Rejected At-
Credits

Certificate validation in node-sass 2.0.0 to 4.14.1 is disabled when requesting binaries even if the user is not specifying an alternative download path.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:11 Jan, 2021 | 18:14
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 15:05
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

Certificate validation in node-sass 2.0.0 to 4.14.1 is disabled when requesting binaries even if the user is not specifying an alternative download path.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/sass/node-sass/pull/567#issuecomment-656609236
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://github.com/sass/node-sass/pull/567#issuecomment-656609236
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/sass/node-sass/pull/567#issuecomment-656609236
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/sass/node-sass/pull/567#issuecomment-656609236
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:11 Jan, 2021 | 19:15
Updated At:15 Jan, 2021 | 13:29

Certificate validation in node-sass 2.0.0 to 4.14.1 is disabled when requesting binaries even if the user is not specifying an alternative download path.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.3MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Primary2.05.0MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.3
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.0
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

sass-lang
sass-lang
>>node-sass>>Versions from 2.0.0(inclusive) to 4.14.1(inclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:sass-lang:node-sass:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/sass/node-sass/pull/567#issuecomment-656609236cve@mitre.org
Third Party Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/sass/node-sass/pull/567#issuecomment-656609236
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Third Party Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

98Records found

CVE-2017-7468
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.70% / 71.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Jul, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In curl and libcurl 7.52.0 to and including 7.53.1, libcurl would attempt to resume a TLS session even if the client certificate had changed. That is unacceptable since a server by specification is allowed to skip the client certificate check on resume, and may instead use the old identity which was established by the previous certificate (or no certificate). libcurl supports by default the use of TLS session id/ticket to resume previous TLS sessions to speed up subsequent TLS handshakes. They are used when for any reason an existing TLS connection couldn't be kept alive to make the next handshake faster. This flaw is a regression and identical to CVE-2016-5419 reported on August 3rd 2016, but affecting a different version range.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-[UNKNOWN]CURL
Product-libcurlcurl
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Jul, 2017 | 17:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

iSmartAlarm cube devices have an SSL Certificate Validation Vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ismartalarmn/a
Product-cubeone_firmwarecubeonen/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7192
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.22% / 45.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-06 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

WebSocket.swift in Starscream before 2.0.4 allows an SSL Pinning bypass because of incorrect management of the certValidated variable (it can be set to true but cannot be set to false).

Action-Not Available
Vendor-starscream_projectn/a
Product-starscreamn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-5653
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-3.17% / 86.41%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Apr, 2017 | 16:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-cxfApache CXF
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-44533
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-HackerOne
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 49.98%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-24 Feb, 2022 | 18:27
Updated-30 Apr, 2025 | 22:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Node.js (OpenJS Foundation)Oracle CorporationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-peoplesoft_enterprise_peopletoolsdebian_linuxgraalvmmysql_clustermysql_enterprise_monitormysql_connectorsmysql_workbenchnode.jsmysql_serverNode
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-2498
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 May, 2017 | 04:54
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.3.2 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component. It allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via an untrusted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_osn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-18227
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.01%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Mar, 2018 | 04:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 21:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TitanHQ WebTitan Gateway has incorrect certificate validation for the TLS interception feature.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-titanhqn/a
Product-webtitan_gatewayn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000417
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.15% / 36.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jan, 2018 | 23:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 04:29
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

MatrixSSL version 3.7.2 adopts a collision-prone OID comparison logic resulting in possible spoofing of OIDs (e.g. in ExtKeyUsage extension) on X.509 certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-matrixssln/a
Product-matrixssln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2012-6071
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Nov, 2019 | 16:44
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 21:21
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

nuSOAP before 0.7.3-5 does not properly check the hostname of a cert.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-nusoap_projectnusoapDebian GNU/Linux
Product-nusoapdebian_linuxnusoap
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2013-0264
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Dec, 2019 | 21:38
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 14:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An import error was introduced in Cumin in the code refactoring in r5310. Server certificate validation is always disabled when connecting to Aviary servers, even if the installed packages on a system support it.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cuminRed Hat, Inc.
Product-mrg_management_consolecumin
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-29726
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 21.51%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 May, 2022 | 16:25
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:53
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.3 does not properly ensure that a certificate is actually associated with the host due to improper validation of certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 201104.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-sterling_secure_proxysecure_external_authentication_serverSterling Secure ProxySecure External Authentication Server
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-27400
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Apr, 2021 | 16:48
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:48
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise Cassandra integrations (storage backend and database secrets engine plugin) did not validate TLS certificates when connecting to Cassandra clusters. Fixed in 1.6.4 and 1.7.1

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25633
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.29% / 52.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-11 Oct, 2021 | 16:43
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Content Manipulation with Double Certificate Attack

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to combine multiple certificate data, which when opened caused LibreOffice to display a validly signed indicator but whose content was unrelated to the signature shown. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationDebian GNU/Linux
Product-debian_linuxlibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-3762
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.23% / 45.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Mar, 2020 | 18:20
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Data Protection Central versions 1.0, 1.0.1, 18.1, 18.2, and 19.1 contains an Improper Certificate Chain of Trust Vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by obtaining a CA signed certificate from Data Protection Central to impersonate a valid system to compromise the integrity of data.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-emc_integrated_data_protection_applianceemc_data_protection_centralData Protection Central
CWE ID-CWE-296
Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-3046
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 35.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Sep, 2009 | 17:00
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 06:14
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Opera before 10.00 does not check all intermediate X.509 certificates for revocation, which makes it easier for remote SSL servers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a revoked certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpera
Product-opera_browsern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-9040
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.14% / 34.36%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jun, 2020 | 15:21
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 10:19
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Couchbase Server Java SDK before 2.7.1.1 allows a potential attacker to forge an SSL certificate and pose as the intended peer. An attacker can leverage this flaw by crafting a cryptographically valid certificate that will be accepted by Java SDK's Netty component due to missing hostname verification.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCouchbase, Inc.
Product-couchbase_server_java_sdkn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-11132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 29.42%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in heinekingmedia StashCat before 1.5.18 for Android. No certificate pinning is implemented; therefore the attacker could issue a certificate for the backend and the application would not notice it.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-heinekingmedian/a
Product-stashcatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19270
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:34
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/aFedora Project
Product-fedoraproftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-19271
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.53% / 66.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Nov, 2019 | 03:33
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-proftpdn/a
Product-proftpdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.24% / 47.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 Dec, 2020 | 20:12
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Ptarmigan before 0.2.3 lacks API token validation, e.g., an "if (token === apiToken) {return true;} return false;" code block.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ptarmigan_projectn/a
Product-ptarmigann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-1000097
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.19% / 40.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-04 Oct, 2017 | 01:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

On Darwin, user's trust preferences for root certificates were not honored. If the user had a root certificate loaded in their Keychain that was explicitly not trusted, a Go program would still verify a connection using that root certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGo
Product-gon/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-11727
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Mozilla Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.13% / 32.69%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jul, 2019 | 13:16
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability exists where it possible to force Network Security Services (NSS) to sign CertificateVerify with PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures when those are the only ones advertised by server in CertificateRequest in TLS 1.3. PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures should not be used for TLS 1.3 messages. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 68.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Mozilla Corporation
Product-firefoxFirefox
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-1006
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-3.04% / 86.15%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jul, 2019 | 18:56
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 18:06
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Identity Foundation (WIF), allowing signing of SAML tokens with arbitrary symmetric keys, aka 'WCF/WIF SAML Token Authentication Bypass Vulnerability'.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016sharepoint_foundationwindows_server_2012windows_8.1windows_rt_8.1identitymodelwindows_7sharepoint_serversharepoint_enterprise_serverwindows_10.net_frameworkwindows_server_2019windows_server_2008WindowsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for 32-bit systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft.IdentityModelMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Windows ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows RT 8.1Microsoft SharePoint ServerMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2016Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 8.1 for x64-based systemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.5.2Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 on Windows Server 2019Microsoft SharePoint FoundationMicrosoft .NET Framework 3.5Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5.1Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation)Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows 10 Version 1703 for 32-bit SystemsMicrosoft .NET Framework 4.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-0129
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.74% / 81.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft Lync for Mac 2011 fails to properly validate certificates, allowing remote attackers to alter server-client communications, aka "Microsoft Lync for Mac Certificate Validation Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-lync_for_macLync for Mac
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-0248
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 77.04%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7 allow an attacker to bypass Enhanced Security Usage taggings when they present a certificate that is invalid for a specific use, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-.net_frameworkMicrosoft .NET Framework
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-15042
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.00% / 0.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Oct, 2019 | 16:41
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-7662
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Feb, 2017 | 08:35
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.2 is affected. macOS before 10.12.2 is affected. watchOS before 3.1.3 is affected. The issue involves the "Security" component, which allows remote attackers to spoof certificates via unspecified vectors.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchosmac_os_xn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-16179
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 41.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Sep, 2019 | 20:36
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 01:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Limesurvey before 3.17.14 does not enforce SSL/TLS usage in the default configuration.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-limesurveyn/a
Product-limesurveyn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-6517
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Perforce
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 42.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Mar, 2019 | 19:14
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 06:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Prior to version 0.3.0, chloride's use of net-ssh resulted in host fingerprints for previously unknown hosts getting added to the user's known_hosts file without confirmation. In version 0.3.0 this is updated so that the user's known_hosts file is not updated by chloride.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Perforce Software, Inc. ("Puppet")
Product-chlorideChloride
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4436
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apple Inc.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.13% / 32.59%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Apr, 2019 | 17:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A certificate validation issue existed in configuration profiles. This was addressed with additional checks. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 12.1.1, tvOS 12.1.1, watchOS 5.1.2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aApple Inc.
Product-iphone_oswatchostvosiOS, tvOS, watchOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-8231
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Lenovo Group Ltd.
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.10% / 29.17%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Jun, 2017 | 00:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Lenovo Service Bridge before version 4, a bug found in the signature verification logic of the code signing certificate could be exploited by an attacker to insert a forged code signing certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Lenovo Group Limited
Product-lenovo_service_bridgeService Bridge
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-32574
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.22% / 78.21%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jul, 2021 | 17:28
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.3.0 through 1.10.0 Envoy proxy TLS configuration does not validate destination service identity in the encoded subject alternative name. Fixed in 1.8.14, 1.9.8, and 1.10.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-consuln/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-22943
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.22% / 44.83%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Feb, 2023 | 17:22
Updated-28 Feb, 2025 | 11:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Modular Input REST API Requests Connect via HTTP after Certificate Validation Failure in Splunk Add-on Builder and Splunk CloudConnect SDK

In Splunk Add-on Builder (AoB) versions below 4.1.2 and the Splunk CloudConnect SDK versions below 3.1.3, requests to third-party APIs through the REST API Modular Input incorrectly revert to using HTTP to connect after a failure to connect over HTTPS occurs.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-add-on_buildercloudconnect_software_development_kitSplunk Add-on BuilderSplunk CloudConnect SDK
CWE ID-CWE-636
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-25636
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Document Foundation, The
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.18% / 40.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect trust validation of signature with ambiguous KeyInfo children

LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libreofficeThe Document FoundationFedora Project
Product-fedoralibreofficeLibreOffice
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-20245
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Jan, 2019 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 19:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LDAP auth backend (airflow.contrib.auth.backends.ldap_auth) prior to Apache Airflow 1.10.1 was misconfigured and contained improper checking of exceptions which disabled server certificate checking.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-airflowApache Airflow
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0465
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 55.85%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 14:30
Updated-18 Feb, 2025 | 21:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored

Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-0466
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenSSL Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.51% / 65.28%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2023 | 14:30
Updated-19 Feb, 2025 | 18:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate policy check not enabled

The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-OpenSSL
Product-opensslOpenSSL
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17612
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.01% / 76.16%
||
7 Day CHG-0.02%
Published-09 Nov, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Sennheiser HeadSetup 7.3.4903 places Certification Authority (CA) certificates into the Trusted Root CA store of the local system, and publishes the private key in the SennComCCKey.pem file within the public software distribution, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary web sites or software publishers for several years, even if the HeadSetup product is uninstalled. NOTE: a vulnerability-assessment approach must check all Windows systems for CA certificates with a CN of 127.0.0.1 or SennComRootCA, and determine whether those certificates are unwanted.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-sennheisern/aMicrosoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1headsetupwindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10windows_server_2019windows_server_2008n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-39312
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 53.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Jul, 2024 | 16:30
Updated-11 Apr, 2025 | 14:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Botan has an Authorization Error due to Name Constraint Decoding Bug

Botan is a C++ cryptography library. X.509 certificates can identify elliptic curves using either an object identifier or using explicit encoding of the parameters. A bug in the parsing of name constraint extensions in X.509 certificates meant that if the extension included both permitted subtrees and excluded subtrees, only the permitted subtree would be checked. If a certificate included a name which was permitted by the permitted subtree but also excluded by excluded subtree, it would be accepted. Fixed in versions 3.5.0 and 2.19.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-botan_projectrandombitrandombit
Product-botanbotanbotan
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36478
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.25% / 48.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aArm LimitedDebian GNU/LinuxSiemens AG
Product-debian_linuxlogo\!_cmr2040_firmwaresimatic_rtu3031c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030csimatic_rtu3041c_firmwaresimatic_rtu3041clogo\!_cmr2040simatic_rtu3000clogo\!_cmr2020simatic_rtu3031csimatic_rtu3000c_firmwarelogo\!_cmr2020_firmwaresimatic_rtu3030c_firmwarembed_tlsn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-48437
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.07% / 22.20%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Apr, 2023 | 00:00
Updated-10 Feb, 2025 | 17:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in x509/x509_verify.c in LibreSSL before 3.6.1, and in OpenBSD before 7.2 errata 001. x509_verify_ctx_add_chain does not store errors that occur during leaf certificate verification, and therefore an incorrect error is returned. This behavior occurs when there is an installed verification callback that instructs the verifier to continue upon detecting an invalid certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aOpenBSD
Product-libresslopenbsdn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2020-36425
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 52.82%
||
7 Day CHG-0.03%
Published-19 Jul, 2021 | 00:00
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 17:30
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. It incorrectly uses a revocationDate check when deciding whether to honor certificate revocation via a CRL. In some situations, an attacker can exploit this by changing the local clock.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aDebian GNU/LinuxArm Limited
Product-mbed_tlsdebian_linuxn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-41316
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.3||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.10% / 28.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Oct, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-15 May, 2025 | 15:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise’s TLS certificate auth method did not initially load the optionally configured CRL issued by the role's CA into memory on startup, resulting in the revocation list not being checked if the CRL has not yet been retrieved. Fixed in 1.12.0, 1.11.4, 1.10.7, and 1.9.10.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aHashiCorp, Inc.
Product-vaultn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-3083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 43.03%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-30 May, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Hive (JDBC + HiveServer2) implements SSL for plain TCP and HTTP connections (it supports both transport modes). While validating the server's certificate during the connection setup, the client in Apache Hive before 1.2.2 and 2.0.x before 2.0.1 doesn't seem to be verifying the common name attribute of the certificate. In this way, if a JDBC client sends an SSL request to server abc.com, and the server responds with a valid certificate (certified by CA) but issued to xyz.com, the client will accept that as a valid certificate and the SSL handshake will go through.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-hiveApache Hive
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-20011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.36% / 57.54%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 May, 2021 | 20:09
Updated-06 Aug, 2024 | 03:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

libgrss through 0.7.0 fails to perform TLS certificate verification when downloading feeds, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the contents of feeds without detection. This occurs because of the default behavior of SoupSessionSync.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aThe GNOME Project
Product-libgrssn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1320
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.11% / 30.31%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jan, 2019 | 18:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Apache Thrift Java client library versions 0.5.0 through 0.11.0 can bypass SASL negotiation isComplete validation in the org.apache.thrift.transport.TSaslTransport class. An assert used to determine if the SASL handshake had successfully completed could be disabled in production settings making the validation incomplete.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationF5, Inc.Debian GNU/LinuxOracle Corporation
Product-global_lifecycle_management_opatchdebian_linuxnosql_databasethrifttraffix_signaling_delivery_controllerApache Thrift
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2016-1132
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.30% / 52.67%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2017 | 14:00
Updated-20 Apr, 2025 | 01:37
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Shoplat App for iOS 1.10.00 through 1.18.00 does not properly verify SSL certificates.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-docomon/a
Product-shoplatn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12461
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-OpenText (formerly Micro Focus)
CVSS Score-3.5||LOW
EPSS-0.10% / 27.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jul, 2018 | 18:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Revocation Check failure

Fixed issues with NetIQ eDirectory prior to 9.1.1 when checking certificate revocation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-netiqNetIQ
Product-edirectoryeDirectory
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-31083
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-8.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.17% / 38.09%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2022 | 18:15
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 18:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Authentication bypass in Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter

Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 4.10.11 and 5.2.2, the certificate in the Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter not validated. As a result, authentication could potentially be bypassed by making a fake certificate accessible via certain Apple domains and providing the URL to that certificate in an authData object. Versions 4.0.11 and 5.2.2 prevent this by introducing a new `rootCertificateUrl` property to the Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter which takes the URL to the root certificate of Apple's Game Center authentication certificate. If no value is set, the `rootCertificateUrl` property defaults to the URL of the current root certificate as of May 27, 2022. Keep in mind that the root certificate can change at any time and that it is the developer's responsibility to keep the root certificate URL up-to-date when using the Parse Server Apple Game Center auth adapter. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-parseplatformparse-community
Product-parse-serverparse-server
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0786
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-1.14% / 77.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Jan, 2018 | 01:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 23:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.7, 4.7.1, .NET Core 1.0 and 2.0, and PowerShell Core 6.0.0 allow a security feature bypass vulnerability due to the way certificates are validated, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_server_2016windows_server_2012windows_8.1.net_corewindows_rt_8.1windows_7windows_10powershell_core.net_frameworkwindows_server_2008.NET Framework, .NET Core, and PowerShell Core
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Details not found