Budibase is a low code platform for creating internal tools, workflows, and admin panels. Versions prior to 2.4.3 (07 March 2023) are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. This can lead to an attacker gaining access to a Budibase AWS secret key. Users of Budibase cloud need to take no action. Self-host users who run Budibase on the public internet and are using a cloud provider that allows HTTP access to metadata information should ensure that when they deploy Budibase live, their internal metadata endpoint is not exposed.
Pydio Cells through 4.1.2 allows SSRF. For longer running processes, Pydio Cells allows for the creation of jobs, which are run in the background. The job "remote-download" can be used to cause the backend to send a HTTP GET request to a specified URL and save the response to a new file. The response file is then available in a user-specified folder in Pydio Cells.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Purview allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.38.0 allows SSRF.
Prior to the patched version, an authenticated user of Mautic could read system files and access the internal addresses of the application due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
Databasir is a team-oriented relational database model document management platform. Databasir 1.01 has Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. During the download verification process of a JDBC driver the corresponding JDBC driver download address will be downloaded first, but this address will return a response page with complete error information when accessing a non-existent URL. Attackers can take advantage of this feature for SSRF.
A malicious actor who has been authenticated and granted specific permissions in Apache Superset may use the import dataset feature in order to conduct Server-Side Request Forgery attacks and query internal resources on behalf of the server where Superset is deployed. This vulnerability exists in Apache Superset versions up to and including 2.0.1.
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2, blind SSRF via an XML-RPC call was possible.
In Recipes, versions 0.9.1 through 1.2.5 are vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF), in the “Import Recipe” functionality. When an attacker enters the localhost URL, a low privileged attacker can access/read the internal file system to access sensitive information.
PartKeepr versions up to v1.4.0, in the functionality to upload attachments using a URL when creating a part does not validate that requests can be made to local ports, allowing an authenticated user to carry out SSRF attacks and port enumeration.
PostHog database_schema Server-Side Request Forgery Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of PostHog. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the database_schema method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a URI prior to accessing resources. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose information in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-25358.
In directus versions v9.0.0-beta.2 through 9.6.0 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the media upload functionality which allows a low privileged user to perform internal network port scans.
Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability
The DefaultRepositoryAdminService class in Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.9 allowed remote attackers, who have 'can add repository permission', to enumerate the existence of internal network and filesystem resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Vova Anokhin WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate.This issue affects WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate: from n/a through 5.12.6.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco BroadWorks CommPilot application could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain confidential information from the BroadWorks server and other device on the network. {{value}} ["%7b%7bvalue%7d%7d"])}]]
Synapsoft pdfocus 1.17 is vulnerable to local file inclusion and server-side request forgery Directory Traversal.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WPGraphQL.This issue affects WPGraphQL: from n/a through 1.14.5.
Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.36.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to potentially perform network enumeration via Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
OneBlog v2.3.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the parameter entryUrls.
The third party intelligence connector in Securonix SNYPR 6.3.1 Build 184295_0302 allows an authenticated user to obtain access to server configuration details via SSRF.
The AppCheck research team identified a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the DNN CMS platform, formerly known as DotNetNuke. SSRF vulnerabilities allow the attacker to exploit the target system to make network requests on their behalf, allowing a range of possible attacks. In the most common scenario, the attacker exploits SSRF vulnerabilities to attack systems behind the firewall and access sensitive information from Cloud Provider metadata services.
Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in owncloud/user_ldap < 0.15.4 in the settings of the user_ldap app. Administration role is necessary for exploitation.
Misskey is an open source, decentralized microblogging platform. In affected versions a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability exists in "Upload from URL" and remote attachment handling. This could result in the disclosure of non-public information within the internal network. This has been fixed in 12.90.0. However, if you are using a proxy, you will need to take additional measures. As a workaround this exploit may be avoided by appropriately restricting access to private networks from the host where the application is running.
Nagios Enterprises NagiosXI <= 5.8.4 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in schedulereport.php. Any authenticated user can create scheduled reports containing PDF screenshots of any view in the NagiosXI application. Due to lack of input sanitisation, the target page can be replaced with an SSRF payload to access internal resources or disclose local system files.
Dell EMC Data Protection Central versions 19.5 and prior contain a Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the DPC DNS client processing. A remote malicious user could potentially exploit this vulnerability, allowing port scanning of external hosts.
A vulnerability has been found in Beijing Founder Electronics Founder Enjoys All-Media Acquisition and Editing System 3.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /newsedit/newsedit/xy/imageProxy.do of the component File Protocol Handler. The manipulation of the argument xyImgUrl leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors.
Plone through 5.2.4 allows remote authenticated managers to conduct SSRF attacks via an event ical URL, to read one line of a file.
SSRF in the document conversion component of Webware Webdesktop 5.1.15 allows an attacker to read all files from the server.
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) vulnerability in FortiManager and FortiAnalyser GUI 7.0.0, 6.4.5 and below, 6.2.7 and below, 6.0.11 and below, 5.6.11 and below may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specifically crafted web requests.
eLabFTW is an open source electronic lab notebook for research labs. This vulnerability allows an attacker to make GET requests on behalf of the server. It is "blind" because the attacker cannot see the result of the request. Issue has been patched in eLabFTW 4.0.0.
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.3 and 7.4 is vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-4786. IBM X-Force ID: 206087.
MyBB before 1.8.11 allows remote attackers to bypass an SSRF protection mechanism.
The Import feature of the RSVPMaker WordPress plugin before 8.7.3 (/wp-admin/tools.php?page=rsvpmaker_export_screen) takes an URL input and calls curl on it, without first validating it to ensure it's a remote one. As a result, a high privilege user could use that feature to scan the internal network via a SSRF attack.
Sydent is a reference Matrix identity server. Sydent can be induced to send HTTP GET requests to internal systems, due to lack of parameter validation or IP address blacklisting. It is not possible to exfiltrate data or control request headers, but it might be possible to use the attack to perform an internal port enumeration. This issue has been addressed in in 9e57334, 8936925, 3d531ed, 0f00412. A potential workaround would be to use a firewall to ensure that Sydent cannot reach internal HTTP resources.
In Camaleon CMS, versions 2.1.2.0 to 2.6.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the media upload feature, which allows admin users to fetch media files from external URLs but fails to validate URLs referencing to localhost or other internal servers. This allows attackers to read files stored in the internal server.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, and 8.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197502.
IBM Jazz Team Server 6.0.6, 6.0.6.1, 7.0, 7.0.1, and 7.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 198931.