Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Broadstreet Broadstreet Ads broadstreet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Broadstreet Ads: from n/a through <= 1.52.1.
The Modular DS: Monitor, update, and backup multiple websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the postConfirmOauth() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect the plugin's OAuth/SSO connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Google PageRank Display plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.4. This is due to missing nonce validation in the gpdisplay_option() function, which handles the plugin settings page. The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the form handler does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing the POST request. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a crafted request that changes the plugin's settings (stored via update_option()), such as the display style used to render the PageRank badge.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SEO Redirection plugin <= 8.9 at WordPress, leading to deletion of 404 errors and redirection history.
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, the player skin configuration endpoint at admin/playerUpdate.json.php does not validate CSRF tokens. The plugins table is explicitly excluded from the ORM's domain-based security check via ignoreTableSecurityCheck(), removing the only other layer of defense. Combined with SameSite=None cookies, a cross-origin POST can modify the video player appearance on the entire platform.
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 26.0 and prior, the site customization endpoint at admin/customize_settings_nativeUpdate.json.php lacks CSRF token validation and writes uploaded logo files to disk before the ORM's domain-based security check executes. Combined with SameSite=None cookie policy, a cross-origin POST can overwrite the platform's logo with attacker-controlled content.
A CSRF vulnerability in Shopxian CMS 3.0.0 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to craft a malicious link, potentially causing the administrator to perform unintended actions on an affected system. The vulnerability could allow attackers to modify or delete specific content through crafted requests, potentially leading to data loss and system integrity issues.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in loopus WP Ultimate Tours Builder WP_UltimateToursBuilder allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Ultimate Tours Builder: from n/a through <= 1.055.
The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 4.2.5 does not have CSRF check when deleting a client, and does not ensure that the object to be deleted is actually a client, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary client and post via a CSRF attack.
The Skysa Text Ticker App plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the SkysaApps_Admin_AppPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into making a forged request to modify the plugin's settings, including the scrolling message text and URL, via a forged cross-site request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Customer Reviews for WooCommerce plugin <= 5.3.5 at WordPress.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Giraphix Creative Layouts for Elementor layouts-for-elementor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Layouts for Elementor: from n/a through <= 1.11.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in silverplugins217 Custom Fields Account Registration For Woocommerce custom-fields-account-registration-for-woocommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Fields Account Registration For Woocommerce: from n/a through <= 1.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify plugin <= 4.2.2 on WordPress.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aphotrax Uptime Robot Plugin for WordPress uptime-robot-monitor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Uptime Robot Plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 2.3.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shortcodes Ultimate plugin <= 5.12.0 at WordPress leading to plugin preset settings change.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mickey Kay's Better Font Awesome plugin <= 2.0.1 at WordPress.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IT Path Solutions SCSS WP Editor scss-wp-editor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SCSS WP Editor: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP OnlineSupport, Essential Plugin Popup Anything – A Marketing Popup and Lead Generation Conversions plugin <= 2.2.1 versions.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Job Configuration History Plugin 1155.v28a_46a_cc06a_5 and earlier allows attackers to delete entries from job, agent, and system configuration history, or restore older versions of job, agent, and system configurations.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins External Monitor Job Type Plugin 191.v363d0d1efdf8 and earlier allows attackers to create runs of an external job.
The DX Sources plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page_build function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a forged request that modifies the plugin's configuration options via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Coupon Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save meta fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The EWWW Image Optimizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ewww_ngg_bulk_init() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform bulk image optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Woo Commerce Minimum Weight plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.0.1. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings update handler in edit-weight.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the minimum order weight setting by tricking a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting an attacker-controlled page containing a forged POST request.
The Xhanch - My Advanced Settings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the `xms_setting()` function on the settings update handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Settings that can be modified include favicon URL, Google Analytics account ID, and various WordPress behavior toggles. The `favicon_url` and `ga_acc_id` values are output on the front-end without escaping, enabling a CSRF to Stored XSS chain.
Edimax GS-5008PL firmware version 1.00.54 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by inducing logged-in administrators to visit malicious pages. Attackers can exploit the lack of anti-CSRF tokens and request validation to change passwords, upload firmware, reboot the device, perform factory resets, or modify network configurations.
The Hueman theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta_box() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save metabox data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Lobot Slider Administrator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.6.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the fourty_slider_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin slider-page configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability was found in easyii CMS. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/sign/out. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the MAC filtering configuration interface. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick users into adding unauthorized MAC addresses to the device's filtering rules without their consent.
The WP ERP | Complete HR solution with recruitment & job listings | WooCommerce CRM & Accounting plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handle_leave_calendar_filter, add_enable_disable_option_save, leave_policies, process_bulk_action, and process_crm_contact functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugins settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The WooCommerce Checkout & Funnel Builder by CartFlows plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.5.15. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the export_json, import_json, and status_logs_file functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import/export settings and trigger logs showing via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Janis Elsts Admin Menu Editor admin-menu-editor allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Admin Menu Editor: from n/a through <= 1.14.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AlgolPlus Advanced Dynamic Pricing for WooCommerce plugin <= 4.1.3 at WordPress.
The addfreespace plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss Download Theme plugin <= 1.0.9 versions.
The Fast & Fancy Filter – 3F plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce verification in the saveFields() function, which handles the fff_save_settins AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin filter settings, update arbitrary options, or create new filter posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10Web Photo Gallery by 10Web photo-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Photo Gallery by 10Web: from n/a through <= 1.8.37.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker quiz-maker allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through <= 6.7.1.2.
The cms-fuer-motorrad-werkstaetten plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on all eight AJAX deletion handlers: vehicles_cfmw_d_vehicle, contacts_cfmw_d_contact, suppliers_cfmw_d_supplier, receipts_cfmw_d_receipt, positions_cfmw_d_position, catalogs_cfmw_d_article, stock_cfmw_d_item, and settings_cfmw_d_catalog. None of these handlers call check_ajax_referer() or wp_verify_nonce(), nor do they perform any capability checks via current_user_can(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary vehicles, contacts, suppliers, receipts, positions, catalog articles, stock items, or entire supplier catalogs via a forged request, provided they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking a link to a malicious page.
The Cool Timeline (Horizontal & Vertical Timeline) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ctl_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save field icons via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents easy-table-of-contents allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Easy Table of Contents: from n/a through <= 2.0.80.
The Customizr theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the czr_fn_post_fields_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to post fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wp-buy 404 Image Redirection (Replace Broken Images) broken-images-redirection allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects 404 Image Redirection (Replace Broken Images): from n/a through <= 1.4.
The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form, Login Form, and User Profile plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the user_registration_pro_delete_account() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force delete users, including administrators, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Theme Negotiation by Rules allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Theme Negotiation by Rules: from 0.0.0 before 1.2.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kuppuraj Advanced All in One Admin Search by WP Spotlight wp-spotlight-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Advanced All in One Admin Search by WP Spotlight: from n/a through <= 1.1.1.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in desertthemes Corpiva corpiva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Corpiva: from n/a through <= 1.0.96.
In Progress WS_FTP Server prior to version 8.7.3, forms within the administrative interface did not include a nonce to mitigate the risk of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.