Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2020-7904

Summary
Assigner-mitre
Assigner Org ID-8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At-30 Jan, 2020 | 17:01
Updated At-04 Aug, 2024 | 09:48
Rejected At-
Credits

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2019.3, some Maven repositories were accessed via HTTP instead of HTTPS.

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
â–¼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:mitre
Assigner Org ID:8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca
Published At:30 Jan, 2020 | 17:01
Updated At:04 Aug, 2024 | 09:48
Rejected At:
â–¼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2019.3, some Maven repositories were accessed via HTTP instead of HTTPS.

Affected Products
Vendor
n/a
Product
n/a
Versions
Affected
  • n/a
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
textN/An/a
Type: text
CWE ID: N/A
Description: n/a
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://blog.jetbrains.com
x_refsource_MISC
https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2020/01/24/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2019/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2020/01/24/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2019/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
â–¼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://blog.jetbrains.com
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2020/01/24/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2019/
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com
Resource:
x_refsource_MISC
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2020/01/24/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2019/
Resource:
x_refsource_CONFIRM
x_transferred
Information is not available yet
â–¼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:cve@mitre.org
Published At:30 Jan, 2020 | 18:15
Updated At:01 Feb, 2020 | 02:38

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2019.3, some Maven repositories were accessed via HTTP instead of HTTPS.

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.17.4HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Primary2.05.8MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 7.4
Base severity: HIGH
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 2.0
Base score: 5.8
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
CPE Matches

JetBrains s.r.o.
jetbrains
>>intellij_idea>>Versions before 2019.3.0(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:jetbrains:intellij_idea:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-295Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-295
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://blog.jetbrains.comcve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2020/01/24/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2019/cve@mitre.org
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2020/01/24/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q4-2019/
Source: cve@mitre.org
Resource:
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

186Records found

CVE-2021-25757
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.64% / 45.91%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 Feb, 2021 | 15:17
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:11
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains Hub before 2020.1.12629, an open redirect was possible.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-hubn/a
CWE ID-CWE-601
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
CVE-2024-41827
Matching Score-8
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.40% / 32.13%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Jul, 2024 | 14:50
Updated-07 Aug, 2024 | 20:44
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.07 access tokens could continue working after deletion or expiration

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityTeamCityteamcity
CWE ID-CWE-613
Insufficient Session Expiration
CVE-2022-24330
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.58% / 43.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Feb, 2022 | 14:35
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 04:07
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2.1, a redirection to an external site was possible.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-601
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
CVE-2020-27627
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.72% / 49.22%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Nov, 2020 | 15:08
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.1.2 was vulnerable to URL injection.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-74
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
CVE-2024-31136
Matching Score-8
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 41.33%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-28 Mar, 2024 | 15:07
Updated-16 Dec, 2024 | 15:54
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 2FA could be bypassed by providing a special URL parameter

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityTeamCityteamcity
CWE ID-CWE-1288
Improper Validation of Consistency within Input
CVE-2019-19703
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.64% / 45.97%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Dec, 2019 | 19:43
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 02:25
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In Ktor through 1.2.6, the client resends data from the HTTP Authorization header to a redirect location.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-ktorn/a
CWE ID-CWE-601
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
CVE-2019-15041
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-8
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-6.1||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.05% / 59.76%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Oct, 2019 | 19:35
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

JetBrains YouTrack versions before 2019.1.52545 allowed unbounded URL whitelisting because of Inclusion of Functionality from an Untrusted Control Sphere.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-youtrackn/a
CWE ID-CWE-601
URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
CVE-2024-35299
Matching Score-6
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.27% / 19.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 May, 2024 | 10:31
Updated-28 Jan, 2025 | 16:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2024.1.29548 the SMTPS protocol communication lacked proper certificate hostname validation

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JetBrains s.r.o.
Product-youtrackYouTrack
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-64685
Matching Score-6
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
CVSS Score-8.1||HIGH
EPSS-0.20% / 9.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Nov, 2025 | 13:27
Updated-26 Feb, 2026 | 17:47
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2025.3.104432 missing TLS certificate validation enabled data disclosure

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JetBrains s.r.o.
Product-youtrackYouTrack
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2023-45613
Matching Score-6
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-JetBrains s.r.o.
CVSS Score-6.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.30% / 21.25%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Oct, 2023 | 10:20
Updated-18 Sep, 2024 | 19:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In JetBrains Ktor before 2.3.5 server certificates were not verified

Action-Not Available
Vendor-JetBrains s.r.o.
Product-ktorKtor
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2019-15042
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.5||HIGH
EPSS-0.66% / 46.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Oct, 2019 | 16:41
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 00:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJetBrains s.r.o.
Product-teamcityn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-5408
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-CERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.75% / 50.11%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 May, 2019 | 14:48
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 05:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
PrinterLogic Print Management Software fails to validate the management portal SSL certificates

The PrinterLogic Print Management software, versions up to and including 18.3.1.96, does not validate, or incorrectly validates, the PrinterLogic management portal's SSL certificate. When a certificate is invalid or malicious, it might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-printerlogicPrinterLogic
Product-print_managementManagement Software
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-4849
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.76% / 50.48%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-03 May, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:02
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in Siveillance VMS Video for Android (All versions < V12.1a (2018 R1)), Siveillance VMS Video for iOS (All versions < V12.1a (2018 R1)). Improper certificate validation could allow an attacker in a privileged network position to read data from and write data to the encrypted communication channel between the app and a server. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker in a privileged network position which allows intercepting the communication channel between the affected app and a server (such as Man-in-the-Middle). Furthermore, an attacker must be able to generate a certificate that results for the validation algorithm in a checksum identical to a trusted certificate. Successful exploitation requires no user interaction. The vulnerability could allow reading data from and writing data to the encrypted communication channel between the app and a server, impacting the communication's confidentiality and integrity. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known. Siemens confirms the security vulnerability and provides mitigations to resolve the security issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-siveillance_vms_videoSiveillance VMS Video for Android, Siveillance VMS Video for iOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-32144
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
CVSS Score-7.6||HIGH
EPSS-0.21% / 11.38%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Apr, 2026 | 12:28
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 15:40
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 until OTP 28.4.2 and 27.3.4.10 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 until 1.20.3 and 1.17.1.2, and ssl from 11.2 until 11.5.4 and 11.2.12.7.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-erlangErlang
Product-erlang\/public_keyerlang\/sslerlang\/otpOTP
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2009-4831
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-5.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.38% / 68.56%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-29 Apr, 2010 | 19:00
Updated-29 Apr, 2026 | 01:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Cerulean Studios Trillian 3.1 Basic does not check SSL certificates during MSN authentication, which allows remote attackers to obtain MSN credentials via a man-in-the-middle attack with a spoofed SSL certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-cerulean_studiosn/a
Product-trilliann/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-26911
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.09% / 61.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Feb, 2021 | 20:54
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 20:33
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

core/imap/MCIMAPSession.cpp in Canary Mail before 3.22 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation for IMAP in STARTTLS mode.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-libmailcorecanarymailn/a
Product-canary_mailmailcore2n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1999035
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.86% / 53.61%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-01 Aug, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:52
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins Inedo BuildMaster Plugin 1.3 and earlier in BuildMasterConfiguration.java, BuildMasterConfig.java, BuildMasterApi.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-inedo_buildmastern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31892
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 38.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Jul, 2021 | 11:02
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:10
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Analyse MyCondition (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Tuning (All versions), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 02 (All versions >= V02.00.12 < 02.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03 (All versions >= V03.00.12 < 03.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 04 (V04.00.02 and all versions >= V04.00.15 < 04.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1 (All versions < V4.1 SP10 HF3), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1 (V5.1), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Remote (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyPrograms (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Programs (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Tools (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyTools (All versions), SINUMERIK Operate V4.8 (All versions < V4.8 SP8), SINUMERIK Operate V4.93 (All versions < V4.93 HF7), SINUMERIK Operate V4.94 (All versions < V4.94 HF5), SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam Editor (All versions). Due to an error in a third-party dependency the ssl flags used for setting up a TLS connection to a server are overwitten with wrong settings. This results in a missing validation of the server certificate and thus in a possible TLS MITM szenario.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-sinumerik_manage_mytoolssinumerik_manage_myprogramssinumerik_integrate_clientsinumerik_analyse_myconditionsinumerik_manage_myresources_firmwaresinumerik_analyse_mycondition_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mytools_firmwaresinumerik_optimize_myprogramming_firmwaresinumerik_manage_mymachinessinumerik_optimize_myprogrammingsinumerik_analyze_myperformance_firmwaresinumerik_analyze_myperformancesinumerik_integrate_client_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_productionsinumerik_manage_myresourcessinumerik_manage_mymachines_firmwaresinumerik_operate_firmwaresinumerik_integrate_for_production_firmwaresinumerik_operatesinumerik_manage_myprograms_firmwareSINUMERIK Analyse MyConditionSINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-TuningSINUMERIK Operate V4.94SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel MonitorSINUMERIK Integrate Client 02SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam EditorSINUMERIK Manage MyResources /ToolsSINUMERIK Manage MyMachinesSINUMERIK Operate V4.93SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformanceSINUMERIK Operate V4.8SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-MonitorSINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /RemoteSINUMERIK Manage MyProgramsSINUMERIK Integrate Client 04SINUMERIK Manage MyTools
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-7821
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Ivanti
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.51% / 39.37%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 15:26
Updated-07 May, 2026 | 20:09
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Improper certificate validation in Ivanti EPMM before versions 12.6.1.1, 12.7.0.1, and 12.8.0.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to enroll a device belonging to a restricted set of unenrolled devices, leading to information disclosure about EPMM appliance and impacting on the integrity of the newly enrolled device identity.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Ivanti Software
Product-endpoint_manager_mobileEndpoint Manager Mobile
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-17187
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-2.54% / 82.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Nov, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 10:39
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-qpid_proton-jApache Qpid Proton-J
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-24281
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.31% / 22.06%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Mar, 2026 | 08:50
Updated-10 Mar, 2026 | 18:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Apache ZooKeeper: Reverse-DNS fallback enables hostname verification bypass in ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager

Hostname verification in Apache ZooKeeper ZKTrustManager falls back to reverse DNS (PTR) when IP SAN validation fails, allowing attackers who control or spoof PTR records to impersonate ZooKeeper servers or clients with a valid certificate for the PTR name. It's important to note that attacker must present a certificate which is trusted by ZKTrustManager which makes the attack vector harder to exploit. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.6 or 3.9.5, which fixes this issue by introducing a new configuration option to disable reverse DNS lookup in client and quorum protocols.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software Foundation
Product-zookeeperApache ZooKeeper
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-350
Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action
CVE-2018-1509
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-IBM Corporation
CVSS Score-3.7||LOW
EPSS-0.87% / 54.02%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Oct, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 141417.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-IBM Corporation
Product-security_guardiumSecurity Guardium
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-15784
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Dell
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.61% / 44.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jan, 2019 | 22:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:51
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
DSA-2019-001: Dell Networking OS10 Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability

Dell Networking OS10 versions prior to 10.4.3.0 contain a vulnerability in the Phone Home feature which does not properly validate the server's certificate authority during TLS handshake. Use of an invalid or malicious certificate could potentially allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Dell Inc.
Product-networking_os10Dell Networking OS10
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-12499
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.48% / 37.79%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-02 Jul, 2018 | 16:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 08:38
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The Motorola MBP853 firmware does not correctly validate server certificates. This allows for a Man in The Middle (MiTM) attack to take place between a Motorola MBP853 camera and the servers it communicates with. In one such instance, it was identified that the device was downloading what appeared to be a client certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aMotorola Mobility LLC. (Lenovo Group Limited)
Product-mbp853_firmwarembp853n/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1153
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Tenable Network Security, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.49% / 38.50%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-18 Jun, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 03:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Burp Suite Community Edition 1.7.32 and 1.7.33 fail to validate the server certificate in a couple of HTTPS requests which allows a man in the middle to modify or view traffic.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-portswiggerTenable, Inc.
Product-burp_suiteBurp Suite Community Edition
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-11775
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Apache Software Foundation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-6.99% / 93.32%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Sep, 2018 | 20:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:23
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-The Apache Software FoundationOracle Corporation
Product-enterprise_repositoryflexcube_private_bankingactivemqApache ActiveMQ
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0611
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.50% / 38.99%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The ANA App for iOS version 4.0.22 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ANA (All Nippon Airways)
Product-anaANA App for iOS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0553
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.54% / 40.95%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Apr, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The iRemoconWiFi App for Android version 4.1.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-glamoGlamo Inc.
Product-iremocon_wifiiRemoconWiFi App for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-1000605
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.86% / 53.62%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 Jun, 2018 | 17:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:13
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins CollabNet Plugin 2.0.4 and earlier in CollabNetApp.java, CollabNetPlugin.java, CNFormFieldValidator.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aJenkins
Product-collabnetn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0434
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.84% / 53.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Oct, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-26 Nov, 2024 | 14:43
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Cisco SD-WAN Solution Certificate Validation Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Zero Touch Provisioning feature of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data by using an invalid certificate. The vulnerability is due to insufficient certificate validation by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Cisco Systems, Inc.
Product-vedge_2000vedge_100_firmwarevedge_5000_firmwarevedge_1000_firmwarevmanage_network_management_systemvedge_5000vedge_100vedge_2000_firmwarevedge_1000Cisco SD-WAN Solution
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0650
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-JPCERT/CC
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.63% / 45.57%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Sep, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 03:35
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

The LINE MUSIC for Android version 3.1.0 to versions prior to 3.6.5 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-linecorpLINE MUSIC CORPORATION
Product-line_musicLINE MUSIC for Android
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-39948
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.28% / 19.19%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-16 Feb, 2023 | 18:06
Updated-22 Oct, 2024 | 20:49
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy)

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortiproxyfortiosFortiOSFortiProxy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-9758
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.46% / 70.14%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Nov, 2017 | 19:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Savitech driver packages for Windows silently install a self-signed certificate into the Trusted Root Certification Authorities store, aka "Inaudible Subversion."

Action-Not Available
Vendor-savitech-icn/a
Product-savitech_drivern/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2018-0334
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Cisco Systems, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.98% / 57.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-07 Jun, 2018 | 21:00
Updated-29 Nov, 2024 | 15:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability in the certificate management subsystem of Cisco AnyConnect Network Access Manager and of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for iOS, Mac OS X, Android, Windows, and Linux could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the TLS certificate check when downloading certain configuration files. The vulnerability is due to improper use of Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol and improper server certificate validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by preparing malicious profile and localization files for Cisco AnyConnect to use. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to remotely change the configuration profile, a certificate, or the localization data used by AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh23141.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aCisco Systems, Inc.
Product-anyconnect_secure_mobility_clientCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client unknown
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-48697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.16% / 5.86%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-26 May, 2026 | 00:00
Updated-27 May, 2026 | 15:31
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 does not verify TLS certificates on outbound HTTPS connections. The execute_web_request_secure() function in src/fast_library.cpp creates a boost::asio::ssl::context with tls_client mode and calls set_default_verify_paths() to load CA certificates, but never calls set_verify_mode(boost::asio::ssl::verify_peer). Without this call, OpenSSL performs the TLS handshake without validating the server's certificate chain, making all HTTPS connections vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. This function is used for telemetry reporting to community-stats.fastnetmon.com, which sends system information including CPU model, kernel version, traffic statistics, and software configuration. An attacker can intercept and modify this data or redirect it to a malicious server.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pavel-odintsovn/a
Product-fastnetmonn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-50752
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Check Point Software Ltd.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-4.86% / 90.89%
||
7 Day CHG+0.61%
Published-08 Jun, 2026 | 11:00
Updated-10 Jun, 2026 | 13:36
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Certificate Validation Bypass in VPN Site-to-Site Connections Using IKEv1

A weakness in the certificate validation logic of the deprecated IKEv1 key exchange may allow an unauthenticated attacker positioned as a man-in-the-middle to bypass certificate validation in VPN site-to-site connections that use certificate-based authentication. Successful exploitation could allow interception or modification of traffic traversing the VPN tunnel.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Product-Quantum Security GatewaySpark Firewalls
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.74% / 49.93%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-14 Jun, 2022 | 00:00
Updated-25 Feb, 2026 | 16:16
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder CLI connections lacked TLS cert validation

In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunkuniversal_forwarderSplunk EnterpriseUniversal Forwarder
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-32151
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Splunk Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.73% / 49.27%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-15 Jun, 2022 | 16:46
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 17:59
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Splunk Enterprise disabled TLS validation using the CA certificate stores in Python 3 libraries by default

The httplib and urllib Python libraries that Splunk shipped with Splunk Enterprise did not validate certificates using the certificate authority (CA) certificate stores by default in Splunk Enterprise versions before 9.0 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions before 8.2.2203. Python 3 client libraries now verify server certificates by default and use the appropriate CA certificate stores for each library. Apps and add-ons that include their own HTTP libraries are not affected. For Splunk Enterprise, update to Splunk Enterprise version 9.0 and Configure TLS host name validation for Splunk-to-Splunk communications (https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation) to enable the remediation.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Splunk LLC (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
Product-splunksplunk_cloud_platformSplunk EnterpriseSplunk Cloud Platform
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6143
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.43% / 34.05%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-13 Apr, 2018 | 13:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 16:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

X509 certificate verification was not correctly implemented in the IP Intelligence Subscription and IP Intelligence feed-list features, and thus the remote server's identity is not properly validated in F5 BIG-IP 12.0.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.2, or 11.5.0-11.5.5.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_advanced_firewall_managerbig-ip_application_security_managerBIG-IP (AFM, ASM)
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2021-31747
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-MITRE Corporation
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.34% / 25.70%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-10 Dec, 2021 | 18:04
Updated-03 Aug, 2024 | 23:03
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Missing SSL Certificate Validation issue exists in Pluck 4.7.15 in update_applet.php, which could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-pluck-cmsn/a
Product-pluckn/a
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6142
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.41% / 32.53%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2018 | 14:00
Updated-16 Sep, 2024 | 22:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

X509 certificate verification was not correctly implemented in the early access "user id" feature in the F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager versions 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, and 11.6.0-11.6.2, and thus did not properly validate the remote server's identity on certain versions of BIG-IP.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_advanced_firewall_managerBIG-IP AFM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-6144
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-F5, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.60% / 44.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-20 Oct, 2017 | 15:00
Updated-13 May, 2026 | 00:24
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In F5 BIG-IP PEM 12.1.0 through 12.1.2 when downloading the Type Allocation Code (TAC) database file via HTTPS, the server's certificate is not verified. Attackers in a privileged network position may be able to launch a man-in-the-middle attack against these connections. TAC databases are used in BIG-IP PEM for Device Type and OS (DTOS) and Tethering detection. Customers not using BIG-IP PEM, not configuring downloads of TAC database files, or not using HTTP for that download are not affected.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-F5, Inc.
Product-big-ip_policy_enforcement_managerF5 BIG-IP PEM
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-43550
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Microsoft Corporation
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.08% / 60.72%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Oct, 2024 | 17:35
Updated-09 Jun, 2026 | 18:28
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Microsoft Corporation
Product-windows_10_21h2windows_10_1809windows_server_2016windows_server_2022_23h2windows_server_2012windows_10_1507windows_11_21h2windows_11_24h2windows_10_22h2windows_server_2022windows_11_22h2windows_server_2019windows_10_1607windows_11_23h2Windows 11 Version 23H2Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Version 1607Windows 11 version 21H2Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 21H2Windows 10 Version 1507Windows 11 Version 24H2Windows 11 version 22H3Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)Windows 10 Version 1809Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)Windows 11 version 22H2Windows Server 2022Windows Server 2012Windows 10 Version 22H2Windows Server 2012 R2
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2025-11043
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. (ABB)
CVSS Score-9.1||CRITICAL
EPSS-0.21% / 10.58%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2026 | 15:52
Updated-26 Jan, 2026 | 15:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Improper Server Certificate Validation in Automation Studio

An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the OPC-UA client and ANSL over TLS client used in Automation Studio versions before 6.5 could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the network to position themselves to intercept and interfere with data exchanges.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-B&R Industrial Automation GmbH
Product-B&R Automation Studio
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-42011
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.39% / 30.25%
||
7 Day CHG+0.08%
Published-07 May, 2026 | 13:51
Updated-16 Jun, 2026 | 21:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Gnutls: gnutls: security bypass due to incorrect name constraint handling

A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because permitted name constraints were incorrectly ignored when previous Certificate Authorities (CAs) only had excluded name constraints. A remote attacker could exploit this to bypass critical name constraint checks during certificate validation. This bypass could lead to the acceptance of invalid certificates, potentially enabling spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks against affected systems.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Hardened ImagesRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update SupportRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2017-7513
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.4||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.48% / 37.89%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-22 Aug, 2018 | 15:00
Updated-05 Aug, 2024 | 16:04
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

It was found that Satellite 5 configured with SSL/TLS for the PostgreSQL backend failed to correctly validate X.509 server certificate host name fields. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to spoof a PostgreSQL server using a specially crafted X.509 certificate.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Red Hat, Inc.
Product-satelliteRed Hat Satellite
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2024-38861
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Checkmk GmbH
CVSS Score-4.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.19% / 8.29%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2024 | 08:11
Updated-20 Dec, 2024 | 18:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Lack of TLS validation in plugin MikroTik on Checkmk Exchange

Improper Certificate Validation in Checkmk Exchange plugin MikroTik allows attackers in MitM position to intercept traffic. This issue affects MikroTik: from 2.0.0 through 2.5.5, from 0.4a_mk through 2.0a.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-tomtretbar
Product-mikrotik
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2026-9697
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-0.28% / 19.26%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-17 Jun, 2026 | 16:46
Updated-23 Jun, 2026 | 05:17
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent

Impact: undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings. Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange. Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added. Patches: Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path. If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-undici
Product-undici
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-21654
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-7.4||HIGH
EPSS-1.06% / 60.19%
||
7 Day CHG+0.02%
Published-22 Feb, 2022 | 22:35
Updated-23 Apr, 2025 | 19:01
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Incorrect configuration handling allows TLS session re-use without re-validation in Envoy

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-envoyproxyenvoyproxy
Product-envoyenvoy
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CVE-2022-22156
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Juniper Networks, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.55% / 41.65%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Jan, 2022 | 00:20
Updated-17 Sep, 2024 | 02:42
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Junos OS: Certificate validation is skipped when fetching system scripts from a HTTPS URL

An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Juniper Networks, Inc.
Product-junosJunos OS
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-300
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
Details not found