The Easy PayPal & Stripe Buy Now Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.3 and in Contact Form 7 – PayPal & Stripe Add-on all versions up to, and including 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'wpecpp_stripe_connect_completion' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugins settings and chance the stripe connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.4 does not have CSRF check in place and does not ensure that the post to be deleted belongs to the plugin, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary posts from the blog

The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 offers a function to create donation buttons, which internally are posts. The process to create a new button is lacking a CSRF check. An attacker could use this to make an authenticated admin create a new button. Furthermore, one of the Button field is not escaped before being output in an attribute when editing a Button, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue as well.

The Easy PayPal Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpeevent_plugin_buttons() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Accept Donations with PayPal allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Accept Donations with PayPal: from n/a through 1.4.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Easy PayPal & Stripe Buy Now Button.This issue affects Easy PayPal & Stripe Buy Now Button: from n/a through 1.8.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Contact Form 7 – PayPal & Stripe Add-on plugin <= 1.9.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Contact Form 7 Redirect & Thank You Page plugin <= 1.0.3 versions.

FUEL CMS 1.5.0 login.php contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

The Memory Usage plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.98. This is due to missing nonce validation in the wpmemory_install_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to silently install one of the several whitelisted plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Easy restaurant menu manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the nsc_eprm_save_menu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload a menu file via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in application/modules/admin/controllers/users.php in Tomaz Muraus Open Blog 1.2.1, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to admin/users/edit that grant administrative privileges.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) before 6.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Combodo iTop is an open source, web based IT Service Management tool. Prior to version 2.7.4, the CSRF token validation can be bypassed through iTop portal via a tricky browser procedure. The vulnerability is patched in version 2.7.4 and 3.0.0.

iF.SVNAdmin through 1.6.2 allows svnadmin/usercreate.php CSRF to create a user.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Management Console of BlackBerry UEM versions earlier than 12.9.1 could allow an attacker to make modifications to the UEM settings in the context of a Management Console administrator.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Forms/PortForwarding_Edit_1 on the ZyXEL O2 DSL Router Classic allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the PortRule_Name parameter.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration screen in wp-relatedposts.php in the WP Related Posts plugin 1.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) wp_relatedposts_title, (2) wp_relatedposts_num, or (3) wp_relatedposts_type parameter.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Backup Bolt allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Backup Bolt: from n/a through 1.4.1.

The WP Fastest Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpfc_remove_cdn_integration_ajax_request_callback function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change cdn settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability was found in zhenfeng13 My-Blog up to 1.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/tags/save. The manipulation of the argument tagName leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A /shell?cmd= XSS issue exists in the HTTPD component of NAT32 v2.2 Build 22284 devices that can be exploited for Remote Code Execution in conjunction with CSRF.

An Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability exists in the embedded web servers in all Modicon M340, Premium, Quantum PLCs and BMXNOR0200 allowing an attacker to send a specially crafted URL to a currently authenticated web server user to execute a password change on the web server.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in zhenfeng13 My-Blog. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/configurations/userInfo. The manipulation of the argument yourAvatar/yourName/yourEmail leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-225264.

The QuickEdit module does not properly validate access to routes, which could allow cross-site request forgery under some circumstances and lead to possible data integrity issues. Sites are only affected if the QuickEdit module (which comes with the Standard profile) is installed. Removing the "access in-place editing" permission from untrusted users will not fully mitigate the vulnerability.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ACollab 1.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that add personal agenda items.

In MailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.23, the potential cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism was not implemented correctly and it was possible to bypass it by removing the anti-CSRF token parameter from the request. This could allow an attacker to manipulate a user into unwittingly performing actions within the application (such as sending email, adding contacts, or changing settings) on behalf of the attacker.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the t3lib_div::quoteJSvalue API function in TYPO3 4.0.13 and earlier, 4.1.x before 4.1.13, 4.2.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3beta2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to the sanitizing algorithm.

A vulnerability was found in atjiu pybbs up to 6.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function setCookie of the file src/main/java/co/yiiu/pybbs/util/CookieUtil.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is named 8aa2bb1aef3346e49aec6358edf5e47ce905ae7b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop 蛋糕商城JPA版 up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable.

NETGEAR JNR1010 devices before 1.0.0.32 allow cgi-bin/webproc CSRF via the :InternetGatewayDevice.X_TWSZ-COM_URL_Filter.BlackList.1.URL parameter.

The Lightbox Plus Colorbox plugin through 2.7.2 for WordPress has cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via wp-admin/admin.php?page=lightboxplus, as demonstrated by resultant width XSS.

A vulnerability has been found in 495300897 wx-shop up to de1b66331368695779cfc6e4d11a64caddf8716e and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.

The CBX Restaurant Booking WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Neet AirStream NAS1.1 devices allow CSRF attacks that cause the settings binary to change the AP name and password.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in code-projects Simple Car Rental System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JMX Console in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that deploy WAR files.

Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects CM400 before 2017-01-11, CM600 before 2017-01-11, D1500 before 2017-01-11, D500 before 2017-01-11, DST6501 before 2017-01-11, JNR1010v1 before 2017-01-11, JWNR2000Tv3 before 2017-01-11, JWNR2010v3 before 2017-01-11, PLW1000 before 2017-01-11, PLW1010 before 2017-01-11, WNR500 before 2017-01-11, WNR612v3 before 2017-01-11, N450 before 2017-01-11, and CG3000Dv2 before 2017-01-11.

A vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Webex Meetings could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions. These actions could include joining meetings and scheduling training sessions.

The iThoughts Advanced Code Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ithoughts_ace_update_options' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

php/qmn_options_questions_tab.php in the quiz-master-next plugin before 4.7.9 for WordPress allows CSRF, with resultant stored XSS, via the question_name parameter because js/admin_question.js mishandles parsing inside of a SCRIPT element.

The Sertifier Certificate & Badge Maker for WordPress – Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sertifier_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's api key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The icegram plugin before 1.9.19 for WordPress has CSRF via the wp-admin/edit.php option_name parameter.

An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 2.1.0. It allows XSS via CSRF.

The beauty-premium theme 1.0.8 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant arbitrary file upload in includes/sendmail.php.

The Ever Compare WordPress plugin through 1.2.3 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Leithold DSGVO All in one for WP.This issue affects DSGVO All in one for WP: from n/a through 4.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository modoboa/modoboa prior to 2.0.4.

The OceanWP theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 4.0.9 to 4.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the oceanwp_notice_button_click() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to install the Ocean Extra plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Clock In Portal- Staff & Attendance Management WordPress plugin through 2.1 does not have CSRF check when deleting Staff members, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary Staff via a CSRF attack