The Wow Skype Buttons WordPress plugin before 4.0.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks

The Side Menu Lite WordPress plugin before 4.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks

The Modal Window WordPress plugin before 5.2.2 within the wow-company admin menu page allows to include() arbitrary file with PHP extension (as well as with data:// or http:// protocols), thus leading to CSRF RCE.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Floating Button.This issue affects Floating Button: from n/a through 6.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Button Generator – easily Button Builder.This issue affects Button Generator – easily Button Builder: from n/a through 2.3.8.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Side Menu Lite – add sticky fixed buttons plugin <= 4.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Modal Window allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Modal Window: from n/a through 6.1.4.

The Counter Box WordPress plugin before 1.2.1 is lacking CSRF check when activating and deactivating counters, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks

The WP Coder WordPress plugin before 2.5.2 within the wow-company admin menu page allows to include() arbitrary file with PHP extension (as well as with data:// or http:// protocols), thus leading to CSRF RCE.

The Counter Box WordPress plugin before 1.2.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such deleting counters via CSRF attacks

The Sticky Buttons WordPress plugin before 3.2.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks

The Button Generator WordPress plugin before 3.0 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete buttons via a CSRF attack

The Popup Box WordPress plugin before 2.2.7 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting popups via CSRF attacks

The Float menu WordPress plugin before 6.0.1 does not have CSRF check in its bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin delete arbitrary menu via a CSRF attack.

The Herd Effects WordPress plugin before 5.2.4 does not have CSRF when deleting its items, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary effects via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Button Generator – easily Button Builder plugin <= 2.3.5 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Bubble Menu – circle floating menu plugin <= 3.0.1 leading to form deletion.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wow-Company Counter Box allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Counter Box: from n/a through 2.0.5.

The WP Coder WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting code created by the plugin, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary ones via a CSRF attack

The Modal Window WordPress plugin before 5.3.10 does not have CSRF check in place when bulk deleting modals, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete them via a CSRF attack

The Herd Effects WordPress plugin before 5.2.7 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting effects via CSRF attacks

The sitetweet WordPress plugin through 0.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in subsonic 6.1.1 allows remote attackers with knowledge of the target username to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change passwords via a crafted request to userSettings.view.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens.

mailcow 0.14, as used in "mailcow: dockerized" and other products, has CSRF.

The Comcast firmware on Cisco DPC3939B (firmware version dpc3939b-v303r204217-150321a-CMCST) devices allows configuration changes via CSRF.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Gitea before 1.5.2 via API routes.This can be dangerous especially with state altering POST requests.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in George Holmes II Wayne Audio Player allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Wayne Audio Player: from n/a through 1.0.

An issue was discovered on D-Link DCS-1130 devices. The device provides a crossdomain.xml file with no restrictions on who can access the webserver. This allows an hosted flash file on any domain to make calls to the device's webserver and pull any information that is stored on the device. In this case, user's credentials are stored in clear text on the device and can be pulled easily. It also seems that the device does not implement any cross-site scripting forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface into executing a cross-site flashing attack on the user's browser and execute any action on the device provided by the web management interface which steals the credentials from tools_admin.cgi file's response and displays it inside a Textfield.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yonatan Reinberg of Social Ink Sinking Dropdowns allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Sinking Dropdowns: from n/a through 1.25.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EditionGuard Dev Team EditionGuard for WooCommerce – eBook Sales with DRM allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects EditionGuard for WooCommerce – eBook Sales with DRM: from n/a through 3.4.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amarjeet Amar allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects gap-hub-user-role: from n/a through 3.4.1.

Subrion CMS 4.2.1 has CSRF in panel/modules/plugins/. The attacker can remotely activate/deactivate the plugins.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Skpstorm SK WP Settings Backup allows Object Injection.This issue affects SK WP Settings Backup: from n/a through 1.0.

Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Several url endpoints are subject to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please refer to the linked GHSA for the complete list. This issue has been addressed in version 3.2.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ben Marshall Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme: from n/a through 4.2.3.

An issue was discovered in PONTON X/P Messenger before 3.11.2. Anti-CSRF tokens are globally valid, making the web application vulnerable to a weakened version of CSRF, where an arbitrary token of a low-privileged user (such as operator) can be used to confirm actions of higher-privileged ones (such as xpadmin).

CSRF was discovered in the web UI in Deluge before 1.3.14. The exploitation methodology involves (1) hosting a crafted plugin that executes an arbitrary program from its __init__.py file and (2) causing the victim to download, install, and enable this plugin.

Multiple endpoints in GestioIP v3.5.7 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can execute actions via the admin's browser by hosting a malicious URL, leading to data modification, deletion, or exfiltration.

An issue in the Login page of Magnolia CMS v6.2.3 and below allows attackers to exploit both an Open Redirect vulnerability and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in order to brute force and exfiltrate users' credentials.

Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID.

The wp-eMember WordPress plugin before 10.6.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CodeMShop 코드엠샵 마이사이트 – MSHOP MY SITE.This issue affects 코드엠샵 마이사이트 – MSHOP MY SITE: from n/a through 1.1.6.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in Catfish <=6.1.* when you upload an html file containing CSRF on the website that uses a google editor; you can specify the menu url address as your malicious url address in the Add Menu column.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhileTrue Most And Least Read Posts Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Most And Least Read Posts Widget: from n/a through 2.5.18.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in Filebrowser < 2.18.0 that allows attackers to create a backdoor user with admin privilege and get access to the filesystem via a malicious HTML webpage that is sent to the victim. An admin can run commands using the FileBrowser and hence it leads to RCE.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hikari Denwa router/Home GateWay (Hikari Denwa router/Home GateWay provided by NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE EAST CORPORATION PR-S300NE/RT-S300NE/RV-S340NE firmware version Ver. 19.41 and earlier, PR-S300HI/RT-S300HI/RV-S340HI firmware version Ver.19.01.0005 and earlier, PR-S300SE/RT-S300SE/RV-S340SE firmware version Ver.19.40 and earlier, PR-400NE/RT-400NE/RV-440NE firmware version Ver.7.42 and earlier, PR-400KI/RT-400KI/RV-440KI firmware version Ver.07.00.1010 and earlier, PR-400MI/RT-400MI/RV-440MI firmware version Ver. 07.00.1012 and earlier, PR-500KI/RT-500KI firmware version Ver.01.00.0090 and earlier, RS-500KI firmware version Ver.01.00.0070 and earlier, PR-500MI/RT-500MI firmware version Ver.01.01.0014 and earlier, and RS-500MI firmware version Ver.03.01.0019 and earlier, and Hikari Denwa router/Home GateWay provided by NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE WEST CORPORATION PR-S300NE/RT-S300NE/RV-S340NE firmware version Ver. 19.41 and earlier, PR-S300HI/RT-S300HI/RV-S340HI firmware version Ver.19.01.0005 and earlier, PR-S300SE/RT-S300SE/RV-S340SE firmware version Ver.19.40 and earlier, PR-400NE/RT-400NE/RV-440NE firmware version Ver.7.42 and earlier, PR-400KI/RT-400KI/RV-440KI firmware version Ver.07.00.1010 and earlier, PR-400MI/RT-400MI/RV-440MI firmware version Ver. 07.00.1012 and earlier, PR-500KI/RT-500KI firmware version Ver.01.00.0090 and earlier, and PR-500MI/RT-500MI firmware version Ver.01.01.0011 and earlier) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

An issue was discovered in Hanwha Techwin Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior. Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities have been identified. The flaws exist within the Redis and Apache Felix Gogo servers that are installed as part of this product. By issuing specific HTTP Post requests, an attacker can gain system level access to a remote shell session. Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior are affected by these vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities can allow for remote code execution.

The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.