In JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2.1, URL injection leading to CSRF was possible.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11.1 a CSRF on login was possible

A CSRF vulnerability was detected in one of the admin endpoints of JetBrains YouTrack. The issue was fixed in YouTrack 2018.4.49852.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in GitHub App connection flow

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible on GraphQL endpoint

JetBrains YouTrack versions before 2019.1 had a CSRF vulnerability on the settings page.

JetBrains TeamCity before 2021.2 was vulnerable to a Time-of-check/Time-of-use (TOCTOU) race-condition attack in agent registration via XML-RPC.

In JetBrains JetBrains Gateway before 2022.3 a client could connect without a valid token if the host consented.

An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had a possible remote code execution issue. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1.

JetBrains Kotlin versions before 1.3.30 were resolving artifacts using an http connection during the build process, potentially allowing an MITM attack.

JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA projects created using the Kotlin (JS Client/JVM Server) IDE Template were resolving Gradle artifacts using an http connection, potentially allowing an MITM attack. This issue, which was fixed in Kotlin plugin version 1.3.30, is similar to CVE-2019-10101.

JetBrains Ktor framework (created using the Kotlin IDE template) versions before 1.1.0 were resolving artifacts using an http connection during the build process, potentially allowing an MITM attack. This issue was fixed in Kotlin plugin version 1.3.30.

JetBrains dotPeek before 2018.2 and ReSharper Ultimate before 2018.1.4 allow attackers to execute code by decompiling a compiled .NET object (such as a DLL or EXE file) with a specific file, because of Deserialization of Untrusted Data.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.2.3, account takeover was potentially possible during a password reset.

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in external OAuth login integration

CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/dbBakMySQL_deal.php?mudi=backup

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different `Content-Type` header value. If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the `is_form_content_type` function call in the CSRF protection logic to include `text/plain`. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on `PUT`, `PATCH` and `DELETE` methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of `?_method= override` feature themselves in their `handle` hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be `PUT`/`PATCH`/`DELETE` when the browser issues a `POST` request.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 4.0.4.0, and Aipo for ASP before 4.0.4.0, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify data.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface on the SMC SMCD3G-CCR (aka Comcast Business Gateway) with firmware before 1.4.0.49.2 allow remote attackers to (1) hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that perform a login via goform/login, or hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (2) enable external logins via an mso_remote_enable action to goform/RemoteRange or (3) change DNS settings via a manual_dns_enable action to goform/Basic.

The AnyMind Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1. This is due to missing nonce protection on the createDOMStructure() function found in the ~/anymind-widget-id.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site’s administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the configuration page in the Recaptcha (aka WP-reCAPTCHA) plugin 2.9.8.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable the CAPTCHA requirement or insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) recaptcha_opt_pubkey, (2) recaptcha_opt_privkey, (3) re_tabindex, (4) error_blank, (5) error_incorrect, (6) mailhide_pub, (7) mailhide_priv, (8) mh_replace_link, or (9) mh_replace_title parameter.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/conf_users_edit.php in PHP Link Directory (phpLD) 4.1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add an administrator via the N action.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mutare EVM allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that (1) change a PIN, (2) delete messages, (3) add a delivery address, or (4) change a delivery address.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Translation Management module 6.x before 6.x-1.21 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userScore_deal.php?mudi=del

The reCAPTCHA Jetpack WordPress plugin through 0.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sender Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce.This issue affects Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.6.18.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) before 2.0+rc3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that send email via an OMP request to OpenVAS Manager. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged to bypass authentication requirements for exploiting CVE-2011-0018.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in mainfile.php in Francisco Burzi PHP-Nuke 8.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts or (2) grant the administrative privilege to a user account, related to a Referer check that uses a substring comparison.

Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/admin_config.php?action=save&var_id=32

The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. The protection is implemented at `kit/src/runtime/server/respond.js`. While the implementation does a sufficient job of mitigating common CSRF attacks, the protection can be bypassed in versions prior to 1.15.2 by simply specifying an upper-cased `Content-Type` header value. The browser will not send uppercase characters, but this check does not block all expected CORS requests. If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. This may lead to all POST operations requiring authentication being allowed in the following cases: If the target site sets `SameSite=None` on its auth cookie and the user visits a malicious site in a Chromium-based browser; if the target site doesn't set the `SameSite` attribute explicitly and the user visits a malicious site with Firefox/Safari with tracking protections turned off; and/or if the user is visiting a malicious site with a very outdated browser. SvelteKit 1.15.2 contains a patch for this issue. It is also recommended to explicitly set `SameSite` to a value other than `None` on authentication cookies especially if the upgrade cannot be done in a timely manner.

Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick users into performing an action they didn't intend to perform under their current authentication. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Cooked is a recipe plugin for WordPress. The Cooked plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in versions up to, and including, 1.7.15.4 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick users into performing an action they didn't intend to perform under their current authentication. This issue has been addressed in release version 1.8.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the pieforms implementation in Mahara before 1.3.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests to any form, related to inappropriate regeneration of session keys.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/moneyRecord_deal.php?mudi=delRecord

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/softBak_deal.php?mudi=backup

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CridioStudio ListingPro allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects ListingPro: from n/a through 2.9.4.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins database Plugin 1.6 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified database server using attacker-specified credentials.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in _ah/admin/interactive/execute (aka the Interactive Console) in the SDK Console (aka Admin Console) in the Google App Engine Python SDK before 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute arbitrary Python code via the code parameter.

The E Unlocked - Student Result WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 is lacking CSRF and validation when uploading the School logo, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin upload arbitrary files, such as PHP via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress.This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.2.6.8.2.

Lime Survey <= 6.5.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The YII_CSRF_TOKEN is only checked when passed in the body of POST requests, but the same check isn't performed in the equivalent GET requests.

A CSRF vulnerability in the UPnP MediaServer implementation in Freebox Server before 4.2.3.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Apache Archiva 1.0 through 1.2.2, and 1.3.x before 1.3.5, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in phpList before 2.10.13 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) edit administrator accounts.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/userLevel_deal.php?mudi=del

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wpmet Wp Ultimate Review plugin <= 2.0.3 versions.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/serverFile_deal.php?mudi=upFileDel&dataID=3