Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the Content-Type HTTP Header of the web application that would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the Authentication Cookie of the web application that would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the request parser of the IPP service. This would allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) and potentially execute arbitrary code on the device.
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability in the attributes parser of the IPP service. This would allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) and potentially execute arbitrary code on the device.
Pre-Auth RCE via Path Traversal
SQL injection vulnerability in summary.php in Xerox Fiery Webtools allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the select parameter.
Xerox WorkCentre 3655, 3655i, 58XX, 58XXi, 59XX, 59XXi, 6655, 6655i, 72XX, 72XXi, 78XX, 78XXi, 7970, and 7970i devices before 073.xxx.086.15410 do not properly escape parameters in the support/remoteUI/configrui.php script, which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute OS commands on the device.
Pre-Auth RCE via Path Traversal
In Xerox FreeFlow Core version 8.0.4, an attacker can exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability to access unauthorized files on the server. This can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE), allowing the attacker to run arbitrary commands on the system.
An issue was discovered on Xerox WorkCentre 3655, 3655i, 58XX, 58XXi, 59XX, 59XXi, 6655, 6655i, 72XX, 72XXi, 78XX, 78XXi, 7970, 7970i, EC7836, and EC7856 devices before R18-05 073.xxx.0487.15000. An attacker can execute PHP code by leveraging a writable file.
An issue was discovered on Xerox WorkCentre 3655, 3655i, 58XX, 58XXi, 59XX, 59XXi, 6655, 6655i, 72XX, 72XXi, 78XX, 78XXi, 7970, 7970i, EC7836, and EC7856 devices before R18-05 073.xxx.0487.15000. There is Blind SQL Injection.
An issue was discovered on Xerox WorkCentre 3655, 3655i, 58XX, 58XXi, 59XX, 59XXi, 6655, 6655i, 72XX, 72XXi, 78XX, 78XXi, 7970, 7970i, EC7836, and EC7856 devices before R18-05 073.xxx.0487.15000. There is unauthenticated Remote Command Execution.
Xerox Phaser 4622 v35.013.01.000 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the function sub_3226AC via the TIMEZONE variable. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via crafted overflow data.
Xerox AltaLink B80xx before 103.008.020.23120, C8030/C8035 before 103.001.020.23120, C8045/C8055 before 103.002.020.23120 and C8070 before 103.003.020.23120 has several SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Xerox Phaser 6510 before 64.61.23 and 64.59.11 (Bridge), WorkCentre 6515 before 65.61.23 and 65.59.11 (Bridge), VersaLink B400 before 37.61.23 and 37.59.01 (Bridge), B405 before 38.61.23 and 38.59.01 (Bridge), B600/B610 before 32.61.23 and 32.59.01 (Bridge), B605/B615 before 33.61.23 and 33.59.01 (Bridge), B7025/30/35 before 58.61.23 and 58.59.11 (Bridge), C400 before 67.61.23 and 67.59.01 (Bridge), C405 before 68.61.23 and 68.59.01 (Bridge), C500/C600 before 61.61.23 and 61.59.01 (Bridge), C505/C605 before 62.61.23 and 62.59.11 (Bridge), C7000 before 56.61.23 and 56.59.01 (Bridge), C7020/25/30 before 57.61.23 and 57.59.01 (Bridge), C8000/C9000 before 70.61.23 and 70.59.01 (Bridge), allows remote attackers with "a weaponized clone file" to execute arbitrary commands in the Web User Interface.
Xerox Phaser 6510 before 64.65.51 and 64.59.11 (Bridge), WorkCentre 6515 before 65.65.51 and 65.59.11 (Bridge), VersaLink B400 before 37.65.51 and 37.59.01 (Bridge), B405 before 38.65.51 and 38.59.01 (Bridge), B600/B610 before 32.65.51 and 32.59.01 (Bridge), B605/B615 before 33.65.51 and 33.59.01 (Bridge), B7025/30/35 before 58.65.51 and 58.59.11 (Bridge), C400 before 67.65.51 and 67.59.01 (Bridge), C405 before 68.65.51 and 68.59.01 (Bridge), C500/C600 before 61.65.51 and 61.59.01 (Bridge), C505/C605 before 62.65.51 and 62.59.01 (Bridge), C7000 before 56.65.51 and 56.59.01 (Bridge), C7020/25/30 before 57.65.51 and 57.59.01 (Bridge), C8000/C9000 before 70.65.51 and 70.59.01 (Bridge), C8000W before 72.65.51 have a remote Command Execution vulnerability in the Web User Interface that allows remote attackers with "a weaponized clone file" to execute arbitrary commands.
Unspecified vulnerability in the Web User Interface in Xerox WorkCentre and WorkCentre Pro before 12.050.03.000, 13.x before 13.050.03.000, and 14.x before 14.050.03.000 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication controls via unknown vectors.
Xerox WorkCentre and WorkCentre Pro before 12.060.17.000, 13.x before 13.060.17.000, and 14.x before 14.060.17.000 allow remote attackers to gain access via unspecified vectors related to "browser permissions."
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Xerox WorkCentre and WorkCentre Pro before 12.050.03.000, 13.x before 13.050.03.000, and 14.x before 14.050.03.000 allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via unspecified vectors relating to "HTTP Security issues."
The Web User Interface in Xerox WorkCentre and WorkCentre Pro before 12.060.17.000, 13.x before 13.060.17.000, and 14.x before 14.060.17.000 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors involving "command injection" in (1) the TCP/IP hostname, (2) Scan-to-mailbox folder names, and (3) certain parameters in the Microsoft Networking configuration. NOTE: vector 1 might be the same as CVE-2006-5290.
The SNMP implementation in Xerox WorkCentre and WorkCentre Pro before 12.050.03.000, 13.x before 13.050.03.000, and 14.x before 14.050.03.000 does not generate authentication failure traps, which allows remote attackers to more easily gain system access and obtain sensitive information via a brute force attack.
The ESS/ Network Controller and MicroServer Web Server components of Xerox WorkCentre and WorkCentre Pro 232, 238, 245, 255, 265 and 275 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary code via "WebUI command injection on TCP/IP hostname."
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in ESS/ Network Controller and MicroServer Web Server in Xerox WorkCentre Pro and Xerox WorkCentre running software 13.027.24.015 and 14.027.24.015 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication or gain "unauthorized network access" via unknown attack vectors.
Unknown vulnerability in Xerox MicroServer Web Server in Document Centre 220 through 265, 332 and 340, 420 through 490, and 535 through 555 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication.
Multiple unknown vulnerabilities in the MicroServer Web Server for Xerox WorkCentre Pro Color 2128, 2636, and 3545, version 0.001.04.044 through 0.001.04.504, allow attackers to bypass authentication.
The default configurations for DocuTech 6110 and DocuTech 6115 have a default administrative password of (1) "service!" on Solaris 8.0 or (2) "administ" on Windows NT, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges.
The default configuration of Xerox DocuTech 6110 and DocuTech 6115 running Solaris 8.0 has a large number of unnecessary services enabled such as RPC and sprayd, which could allow remote attackers to obtain access to the device.
Xerox AtlaLink B8045/B8055/B8065/B8075/B8090 C8030/C8035/C8045/C8055/C8070 printers with software before 101.00x.089.22600 allow an attacker to gain privileges.
Unknown vulnerability in the web server for the ESS/ Network Controller for Xerox Document Centre 240 through 555 running System Software 27.18.017 and earlier allows attackers to "gain unauthorized access."
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) were affected by one or more stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the Google Cloud Print implementation that would allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device. This was caused by an insecure handling of the register parameters, because the size used within a memcpy() function, which copied the action value into a local variable, was not checked properly.
Xerox AltaLink B8045/B8055/B8065/B8075/B8090, AltaLink C8030/C8035/C8045/C8055/C8070 with software releases before 103.xxx.030.32000 includes two accounts with weak hard-coded passwords which can be exploited and allow unauthorized access which cannot be disabled.
The web application on Xerox AltaLink B80xx before 100.008.028.05200, C8030/C8035 before 100.001.028.05200, C8045/C8055 before 100.002.028.05200, and C8070 before 100.003.028.05200 allows unauthenticated command injection.
Xerox ColorCube and WorkCenter devices in 2013 had hardcoded FTP and shell user accounts.
Buffer overflow in system firmware for EDK II may allow unauthenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege and/or denial of service via network access.
Milesight IP security cameras through 2016-11-14 have a buffer overflow in a web application via a long username or password.
Buffer overflow in Internet Mail Connector (IMC) for Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an EHLO request from a system with a long name as obtained through a reverse DNS lookup, which triggers the overflow in IMC's hello response.
Buffer overflow in MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5) 1.2.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via base-64 encoded data, which is not properly handled when the radix_encode function processes file glob output from the ftpglob function.
Buffer overflow in Skia, as used in Google Chrome before 17.0.963.65, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors.
In handle_app_cur_val_response of dtif_rc.cc, there is a possible stack buffer overflow due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the XML Decompression DecodeTreeBlock functionality of AT&T Labs Xmill 0.7. Within `DecodeTreeBlock` which is called during the decompression of an XMI file, a UINT32 is loaded from the file and used as trusted input as the length of a buffer. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains a Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in function zgfx_decompress_segment() that results in a memory corruption and probably even a remote code execution.
Buffer overflow in AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) before 4.3.2229 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a "buddyicon" command with a long "src" argument.
Multiple buffer overflows in the RLE decoder in the rgbimg module in Python 2.5 allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via an image file containing crafted data that triggers improper processing within the (1) longimagedata or (2) expandrow function.
FreeRDP prior to version 2.0.0-rc4 contains a Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in function zgfx_decompress() that results in a memory corruption and probably even a remote code execution.
Denial of service to NT mail servers including Ipswitch, Mdaemon, and Exchange through a buffer overflow in the SMTP HELO command.
Buffer overflow in pngpread.c in libpng before 1.2.44 and 1.4.x before 1.4.3, as used in progressive applications, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PNG image that triggers an additional data row.
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the GetValue functionality of TCL LinkHub Mesh Wi-Fi MS1G_00_01.00_14. A specially-crafted configuration value can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can modify a configuration value to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability represents all occurances of the buffer overflow vulnerability within the sntp binary.
Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Versions of vyper prior to 0.3.2 suffer from a potential buffer overrun. Importing a function from a JSON interface which returns `bytes` generates bytecode which does not clamp bytes length, potentially resulting in a buffer overrun. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the GetValue functionality of TCL LinkHub Mesh Wi-Fi MS1G_00_01.00_14. A specially-crafted configuration value can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can modify a configuration value to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability represents all occurances of the buffer overflow vulnerability within the logserver binary.
overkill has buffer overflow via long player names that can corrupt data on the server machine