Arunna 1.0.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate user profile settings without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious form to change user details, including passwords, email, and administrative privileges by tricking authenticated users into submitting the form.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Gearman Plugin in the GearmanPluginConfig#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
Some Xerox printers (such as the Phaser 3320 V53.006.16.000) did not implement any mechanism to avoid CSRF attacks. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the takeover of a local account on the device.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in RequirementsBypassPage.php of Scratch Wiki scratch-confirmaccount-v3 allows attackers to modify account request requirement bypasses.
phpIPAM 1.4.4 allows Reflected XSS and CSRF via app/admin/subnets/find_free_section_subnets.php of the subnets functionality.
mysiteforme, as of 19-12-2022, has a CSRF vulnerability in the background blog management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, a blog tag will be added
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to modify several resources (including CsvFieldMappingsPage.jspa and ImporterValueMappingsPage.jspa) via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the jira-importers-plugin. The affected versions are before version 8.13.15, and from version 8.14.0 before 8.20.3.
Apache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation. As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user's consent. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Fortify on Demand Uploader Plugin 3.0.10 and earlier allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins SOASTA CloudTest Plugin in the CloudTestServer.DescriptorImpl#doValidate form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
Msvod v10 has a CSRF vulnerability to change user information via the admin/member/edit.html URI.
glFusion CMS 1.7.9 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /public_html/admin/plugins/bad_behavior2/blacklist.php. Using the CSRF vulnerability to trick the administrator to click, an attacker can add a blacklist.
A data modification vulnerability exists in Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugins 1.10.1 and earlier in blueocean-core-js/src/js/bundleStartup.js, blueocean-core-js/src/js/fetch.ts, blueocean-core-js/src/js/i18n/i18n.js, blueocean-core-js/src/js/urlconfig.js, blueocean-rest/src/main/java/io/jenkins/blueocean/rest/APICrumbExclusion.java, blueocean-web/src/main/java/io/jenkins/blueocean/BlueOceanUI.java, blueocean-web/src/main/resources/io/jenkins/blueocean/BlueOceanUI/index.jelly that allows attackers to bypass all cross-site request forgery protection in Blue Ocean API.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Hosted Collaboration Mediation Fulfillment application could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. More Information: CSCva54241. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1). Known Fixed Releases: 11.5(0.98000.216).
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Chef Sinatra Plugin in the ChefBuilderConfiguration.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins VMware Lab Manager Slaves Plugin in the LabManager.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins Git Plugin 3.9.1 and earlier in src/main/java/hudson/plugins/git/GitTagAction.java that allows attackers to create a Git tag in a workspace and attach corresponding metadata to a build record.
The WP Statistics plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 13.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the view() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate and deactivate arbitrary plugins, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Zephyr Enterprise Test Management Plugin in the ZeeDescriptor#doTestConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
An issus was discovered in xiaohuanxiong CMS 5.0.17. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can modify administrator account's password.
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in dazhouda lecms 3.0.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /index.php?my-password-ajax-1 of the component Password Change Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Warnings NG Plugin 5.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers to reset warning counts for future builds.
archivy is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
A spoofing vulnerability exists in Azure DevOps Server when it improperly handles requests to authorize applications, resulting in a cross-site request forgery. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass OAuth protections and register an application on behalf of the targeted user. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to create a page specifically designed to cause a cross-site request. The attacker would then need to convince a targeted user to click a link to the malicious page. The update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Azure DevOps Server protects application registration requests.
A vulnerability has been found in zhenfeng13 My-BBS 1.0 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Multiple endpoints might be affected.
IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6CD 10.6.1.0 through 10.6.5.0 and IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.20 and IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6.0 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.8 IBM DataPower Gateway is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.1.0 for Z hub component is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
A vulnerability was found in ghostxbh uzy-ssm-mall 1.0.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
pimcore is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Medical Informatics Engineering Enterprise Health has a cross site request forgery vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick administrative users into clicking a crafted URL and perform actions on behalf of that administrative user. This issue is fixed as of 2025-04-08.
Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Comtrend router WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820, affecting the GRG-4280us version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application to which he is authenticated.
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below does not validate a CSRF token before processing requests to /dashboard/extend/install/download/<remoteId>. The download() method in concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/extend/install.php checks only the canInstallPackages() permission before fetching a remote marketplace package and writing it to the server's DIR_PACKAGES directory. Because the endpoint is a state-changing GET route with no token enforcement, an attacker who can cause an authenticated administrator to visit a crafted page can force an arbitrary marketplace package to be downloaded. In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPackages() and the site must be connected to the Concrete marketplace. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks https://github.com/maru1009 for reporting.
ESPHome is a system to control microcontrollers remotely through Home Automation systems. API endpoints in dashboard component of ESPHome version 2023.12.9 (command line installation) are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) allowing remote attackers to carry out attacks against a logged user of the dashboard to perform operations on configuration files (create, edit, delete). It is possible for a malicious actor to create a specifically crafted web page that triggers a cross site request against ESPHome, this allows bypassing the authentication for API calls on the platform. This vulnerability allows bypassing authentication on API calls accessing configuration file operations on the behalf of a logged user. In order to trigger the vulnerability, the victim must visit a weaponized page. In addition to this, it is possible to chain this vulnerability with GHSA-9p43-hj5j-96h5/ CVE-2024-27287 to obtain a complete takeover of the user account. Version 2024.3.0 contains a patch for this issue.
kimai2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) failure retry feature of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center before version 8.16.0 allows remote attackers who are able to trick a user into retrying a request to bypass CSRF protection and replay a crafted request.
twill is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Altus Nexto, Nexto Xpress, and Hadron Xtorm devices via any CGI endpoint. This affects Nexto NX3003 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3004 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3005 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX3010 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3020 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX3030 1.8.3.0, Nexto NX5100 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5101 1.8.11.0, Nexto NX5110 1.1.2.8, Nexto NX5210 1.1.2.8, Nexto Xpress XP300 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP315 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP325 1.8.11.0, Nexto Xpress XP340 1.8.11.0, and Hadron Xtorm HX3040 1.7.58.0.
mm-wiki v0.2.1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily add user accounts and modify user information.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Blackboard Academic Suite 8.0.260.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of student users for requests that change configuration and enrollments via unspecified input to (1) update_module.jsp, (2) enroll_course.pl, and (3) unenroll.jsp.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed write operations on a victim-owned repository by exploiting incorrect request types. A mitigating factor is that the attacker would have to be a trusted GitHub Enterprise Server user, and the victim would have to visit a tag in the attacker's fork of their own repository. vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior 3.14 and was fixed in version 3.13.1, 3.12.6, 3.11.12, 3.10.14, and 3.9.17. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The پلاگین پرداخت دلخواه WordPress plugin through 2.9.8 does not have CSRF check in place when resetting its form fields, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in (1) addaddress.php, (2) toggleignore.php, (3) removeignore.php, and (4) removeaddress.php in Infopop UBB.Threads before 6.5.2 Beta allow remote attackers to modify settings as another user via a link or IMG tag.
kimai2 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
The Nested Pages WordPress plugin <= 3.1.15 was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the `npBulkAction`s and `npBulkEdit` `admin_post` actions, which allowed attackers to trash or permanently purge arbitrary posts as well as changing their status, reassigning their ownership, and editing other metadata.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of "translated strings."
firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of OpenID identities.