The WP EasyCart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_duplicate_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP EasyCart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_bulk_delete_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP EasyCart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_bulk_activate_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk activate products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP EasyCart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_bulk_deactivate_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk deactivate products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP EasyCart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_deactivate_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to deactivate products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP EasyCart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_delete_product function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP EasyCart.This issue affects WP EasyCart: from n/a through 5.5.19.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AppPresser Team AppPresser.This issue affects AppPresser: from n/a through 4.3.0.

doorGets 7.0 has a CSRF vulnerability in /doorgets/app/requests/user/configurationRequest.php. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability for "Google Analytics code" modification.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss ProfileGrid.This issue affects ProfileGrid : from n/a through 5.7.8.

Contao 4.7 allows CSRF.

The web server component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO LogLogic Enterprise Virtual Appliance, and TIBCO LogLogic Log Management Intelligence contains multiple vulnerabilities that theoretically allow persistent and reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as well as cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. This issue affects: TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO LogLogic Enterprise Virtual Appliance version 6.2.1 and prior versions. TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO LogLogic Log Management Intelligence 6.2.1. TIBCO LogLogic LX825 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic LX1025 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic LX4025 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic MX3025 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic MX4025 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic ST1025 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic ST2025-SAN Appliance 0.0.004, and TIBCO LogLogic ST4025 Appliance 0.0.004 using TIBCO LogLogic Log Management Intelligence versions 6.2.1 and below. TIBCO LogLogic LX1035 Appliance 0.0.005, TIBCO LogLogic LX1025R1 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic LX1025R2 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic LX4025R1 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic LX4025R2 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic LX4035 Appliance 0.0.005, TIBCO LogLogic ST2025-SANR1 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic ST2025-SANR2 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic ST2035-SAN Appliance 0.0.005, TIBCO LogLogic ST4025R1 Appliance 0.0.004, TIBCO LogLogic ST4025R2 Appliance 0.0.004, and TIBCO LogLogic ST4035 Appliance 0.0.005 using TIBCO LogLogic Log Management Intelligence versions 6.2.1 and below.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Sarada Lite.This issue affects Sarada Lite: from n/a through 1.1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brice CAPOBIANCO Simple Revisions Delete.This issue affects Simple Revisions Delete: from n/a through 1.5.3.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FS010W firmware FS010W_00_V1.3.0 and earlier allows an attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

The FileManager in InfinitumIT DirectAdmin through v1.561 has XSS via CMD_FILE_MANAGER, CMD_SHOW_USER, and CMD_SHOW_RESELLER; an attacker can bypass the CSRF protection with this, and take over the administration panel.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi44320.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the bolt/upload File Upload feature in Bolt CMS 3.6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a JavaScript file to include executable extensions in the file/edit/config/config.yml configuration file.

Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From version 5.101.6 to 6.19.2, incomplete CSRF protections around /session/verify made it possible to use OTCs in login sessions different from the requesting session. In some scenarios this might have made it easier for phishers to take over a Ghost site. This issue has been patched in version 6.19.3.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (formerly CUPS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi55878.

The 10Web Form Maker plugin before 1.13.5 for WordPress allows CSRF via the wp-admin/admin-ajax.php action parameter, with resultant local file inclusion via directory traversal, because there can be a discrepancy between the $_POST['action'] value and the $_GET['action'] value, and the latter is unsanitized.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in creativethemeshq Blocksy blocksy.This issue affects Blocksy: from n/a through <= 2.0.22.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Digital Downloads.This issue affects Easy Digital Downloads: from n/a through 3.2.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeisle Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG.This issue affects Multiple Page Generator Plugin – MPG: from n/a through 3.4.0.

Veeam ONE Reporter 9.5.0.3201 allows CSRF.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins CRX Content Package Deployer Plugin 1.8.1 and earlier allowed attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins JClouds Plugin 2.14 and earlier in BlobStoreProfile.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection and JCloudsCloud.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection allowed users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

DedeCMS v5.7.118 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /sys_task_add.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailMunch MailChimp Forms by MailMunch.This issue affects MailChimp Forms by MailMunch: from n/a through 3.2.1.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /src/dede/makehtml_list_action.php.

Taoensso Sente version Prior to version 1.14.0 contains a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebSocket handshake endpoint that can result in CSRF attack, possible leak of anti-CSRF token. This attack appears to be exploitable via malicious request against WebSocket handshake endpoint. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.14.0 and later.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi85159.

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg70921.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Extend Themes Calliope.This issue affects Calliope: from n/a through 1.0.33.

Jenkins GitHub Authentication Plugin 0.31 and earlier did not use the state parameter of OAuth to prevent CSRF.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of the affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvb19750.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Deploy WebLogic Plugin allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials, or determine whether a file or directory with an attacker-specified path exists on the Jenkins master file system.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in epg search result viewer (kkcald) 0.7.21 and earlier allows an attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections on the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg88291.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins JX Resources Plugin 1.0.36 and earlier in GlobalPluginConfiguration#doValidateClient allowed attackers to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified Kubernetes server, potentially leaking credentials.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device by using a web browser and with the privileges of the user.

A flaw in the WordPress plugin, Minimal Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode through 2.10, allows a CSRF attack to enable maintenance mode, inject XSS, modify several important settings, or include remote files as a logo.

OECMS v4.3.R60321 and v4.3 later is affected by: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The impact is: The victim clicks on adding an administrator account. The component is: admincp.php. The attack vector is: network connectivity. The fixed version is: v4.3.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Industrial Network Director could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious, customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user.

Advantech ADAM-5630 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. It allows an attacker to partly circumvent the same origin policy, which is designed to prevent different websites from interfering with each other.

Dolibarr 7.0.0 is affected by: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The impact is: allow malitious html to change user password, disable users and disable password encryptation. The component is: Function User password change, user disable and password encryptation. The attack vector is: admin access malitious urls.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Ansible Tower Plugin 0.9.1 and earlier in the TowerInstallation.TowerInstallationDescriptor#doTestTowerConnection form validation method allowed attackers permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WL-330NUL Firmware version prior to 3.0.0.46 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Selenium Selenium Grid (formerly Selenium Standalone Server) Fixed in 4.0.0-alpha-7 is affected by: DNS rebinding. The impact is: execute arbitrary code (remote). The component is: WebDriver endpoint of Selenium Grid / Selenium Standalone Server. The attack vector is: Triggered by browsing to to a malicious remote web server. The WebDriver endpoint of Selenium Server (Grid) is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. This can be used to execute arbitrary code on the machine.