A vulnerability classified as critical was found in IPC Unigy Management System 04.03.00.08.0027. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

An improper access control vulnerability in GroupMe allows an a unauthenticated attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 let an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the pagename parameter to wex/html.php. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on local services.

A vulnerability has been found in yiwent Vip Video Analysis 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file data/title.php. The manipulation of the argument titurl leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-230359.

Solar appScreener through 3.10.4, when a valid license is not present, allows XXE and SSRF attacks via a crafted XML document.

A vulnerability was found in JIZHICMS 2.4.5. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function index of the file TemplateController.php. The manipulation of the argument webapi leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230082 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Server-side request forgery in the Video Downloader for TikTok (aka downloader-tiktok) plugin 1.3 for WordPress lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the njt-tk-download-video parameter. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on services

An issue in Prestashop v.8.1.7 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the module upgrade functionality. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties, who report that exploitation requires that an attacker be able to hijack network requests made by an admin user (who, by design, is allowed to change the code that is running on the server).

An Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in demon callback handling in Havoc 2 0.7 allows attackers to send arbitrary network traffic originating from the team server.

streamlit-geospatial is a streamlit multipage app for geospatial applications. Prior to commit c4f81d9616d40c60584e36abb15300853a66e489, the `url` variable on line 47 of `pages/7_📦_Web_Map_Service.py` takes user input, which is passed to `get_layers` function, in which `url` is used with `get_wms_layer` method. `get_wms_layer` method creates a request to arbitrary destinations, leading to blind server-side request forgery. Commit c4f81d9616d40c60584e36abb15300853a66e489 fixes this issue.

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.

Server-side request forgery in Wcms 0.3.2 lets an attacker send crafted requests from the back-end server of a vulnerable web application via the path parameter to wex/cssjs.php. It can help identify open ports, local network hosts and execute command on local services.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository ionicabizau/parse-url prior to 7.0.0.

Insufficient RegEx in private-ip npm package v1.0.5 and below insufficiently filters reserved IP ranges resulting in indeterminate SSRF. An attacker can perform a large range of requests to ARIN reserved IP ranges, resulting in an indeterminable number of critical attack vectors, allowing remote attackers to request server-side resources or potentially execute arbitrary code through various SSRF techniques.

Emby Server before 4.5.0 allows SSRF via the Items/RemoteSearch/Image ImageURL parameter.

I Librarian I-librarian version 4.8 and earlier contains a XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in line 154 of importmetadata.php(simplexml_load_string) that can result in an attacker reading the contents of a file and SSRF. This attack appear to be exploitable via posting xml in the Parameter form_import_textarea.

A vulnerability was found in OTCMS 6.72. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function UseCurl of the file /admin/info_deal.php of the component URL Parameter Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-224016.

In certain Lexmark products through 2023-01-12, SSRF can occur because of a lack of input validation.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infoline Project Management System allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Project Management System: before 4.09.31.125.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in YugaByte, Inc. Yugabyte Managed allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs, Communication Channel Manipulation, Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Yugabyte Managed: from 2.0.0.0 through 2.13.0.0

In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.10514, SSRF is possible because URL filtering can be escaped.

Webtools in Brocade SANnav before version 2.1.1 allows unauthenticated users to make requests to arbitrary hosts due to a misconfiguration; this is commonly referred to as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

A vulnerability was found in AWS SDK 2.59.0. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function XpathUtils of the file aws-android-sdk-core/src/main/java/com/amazonaws/util/XpathUtils.java of the component XML Parser. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. Upgrading to version 2.59.1 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is c3e6d69422e1f0c80fe53f2d757b8df97619af2b. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-216737 was assigned to this vulnerability.

In JetBrains Hub before 2023.1.15725 SSRF protection in Auth Module integration was missing

An issue in the website background of taocms v3.0.2 allows attackers to execute a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. 

Volmarg Personal Management System 1.4.64 is vulnerable to SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) via uploading a SVG file. The server can make unintended HTTP and DNS requests to a server that the attacker controls.

SSRF (Server Side Request Forgery) in getRemoteImage.php in Ueditor in Onethink V1.0 and V1.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, attack intranet hosts, or possibly trigger remote command execution via the upfile parameter.

Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Vebto Pixie Image Editor 1.4 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to disclose information or execute arbitrary code via the url parameter to Launderer.php.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in weixin.php of ChatGPT-wechat-personal commit a0857f6 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests.

The Recurly Client .NET Library before 1.0.1, 1.1.10, 1.2.8, 1.3.2, 1.4.14, 1.5.3, 1.6.2, 1.7.1, 1.8.1 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability due to incorrect use of "Uri.EscapeUriString" that could result in compromise of API keys or other critical resources.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the pkg_url parameter at /manager/index.php.

The Fusion Builder WordPress plugin before 3.6.2, used in the Avada theme, does not validate a parameter in its forms which could be used to initiate arbitrary HTTP requests. The data returned is then reflected back in the application's response. This could be used to interact with hosts on the server's local network bypassing firewalls and access control measures.

iCMS v7.0.16 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the url parameter at admincp.php.

ClipperCMS 1.3.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the rss_url_news parameter at /manager/index.php.

Paperclip ruby gem version 3.1.4 and later suffers from a Server-SIde Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Paperclip::UriAdapter class. Attackers may be able to access information about internal network resources.

The Recurly Client Ruby Library before 2.0.13, 2.1.11, 2.2.5, 2.3.10, 2.4.11, 2.5.4, 2.6.3, 2.7.8, 2.8.2, 2.9.2, 2.10.4, 2.11.3 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the "Resource#find" method that could result in compromise of API keys or other critical resources.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Data Center Analytics, Analytics probe components), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer detail view, Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe components) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.0-00.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.17.

A security issue was discovered in Z-BlogPHP <= 1.7.2. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the zb_users/plugin/UEditor/php/action_crawler.php file allows remote attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs into the source parameter.

Server Side Template Injection in Gambio 4.9.2.0 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via crafted smarty email template.

The application was vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attacks, allowing the backend server to interact with unexpected endpoints, potentially including internal and local services, leading to attacks in other downstream systems.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository janeczku/calibre-web prior to 0.6.18.

A Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Canto Cumulus through 11.1.3 allows attackers to enumerate the internal network, overload network resources, and possibly have unspecified other impact via the server parameter to the /cwc/login login form.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Montonio Montonio for WooCommerce, Wpopal Wpopal Core Features, AMO for WP – Membership Management ArcStone wp-amo, Long Watch Studio WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management, Squidesma Theme Minifier, Paul Clark Styles styles, Designmodo Inc. WordPress Page Builder – Qards, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) PHPFreeChat, Arun Basil Lal Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS, Team Agence-Press CSS Adder By Agence-Press, Unihost Confirm Data, deano1987 AMP Toolbox amp-toolbox, Arun Basil Lal Admin CSS MU.This issue affects Montonio for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.0.1; Wpopal Core Features: from n/a through 1.5.8; ArcStone: from n/a through 4.6.6; WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.1; WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.4; WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management: from n/a through 1.2.2; Theme Minifier: from n/a through 2.0; Styles: from n/a through 1.2.3; WordPress Page Builder – Qards: from n/a through 1.0.5; PHPFreeChat: from n/a through 0.2.8; Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS: from n/a through 1.4.1; CSS Adder By Agence-Press: from n/a through 1.5.0; Confirm Data: from n/a through 1.0.7; AMP Toolbox: from n/a through 2.1.1; Admin CSS MU: from n/a through 2.6.

aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service.

Zalando Skipper v0.13.236 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

Whoogle Search is a self-hosted metasearch engine. In versions 0.8.3 and prior, the `window` endpoint does not sanitize user-supplied input from the `location` variable and passes it to the `send` method which sends a `GET` request on lines 339-343 in `request.py,` which leads to a server-side request forgery. This issue allows for crafting GET requests to internal and external resources on behalf of the server. For example, this issue would allow for accessing resources on the internal network that the server has access to, even though these resources may not be accessible on the internet. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.4.

SLiMS Senayan Library Management System v9.4.2 was discovered to contain multiple Server-Side Request Forgeries via the components /bibliography/marcsru.php and /bibliography/z3950sru.php.

undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.