Bagisto 0.1.5 allows CSRF under /admin URIs.

A vulnerability was detected in Webkul QloApps up to 1.7.0. This affects an unknown function of the component CSRF Token Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument token results in authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor explains: "As We are already aware about this vulnerability and our Internal team are already working on this issue. (...) We'll implement the fix for this vulnerability in our next major release."

UnoPim is an open-source Product Information Management (PIM) system built on the Laravel framework. Before 0.2.1, some of the endpoints of the application is vulnerable to Cross site Request forgery (CSRF). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.2.1.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Webkul QloApps 1.6.1. Affected is the function logout of the file /en/?mylogout of the component URL Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure. They are aware about it and are working on resolving it.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Bagisto before v.1.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML script.

The Floating Social Buttons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the floating_social_buttons_option() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Flat Preloader WordPress plugin before 1.5.4 does not enforce nonce checks when saving its settings, as well as does not sanitise and escape them, which could allow attackers to a make logged in admin change them with a Cross-Site Scripting payload (triggered either in the frontend or backend depending on the payload)

The Weather Effect WordPress plugin before 1.3.4 does not have any CSRF checks in place when saving its settings, and do not validate or escape them, which could lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue.

Ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager. The current implementation of token parsing does not adequately validate CSRF tokens when users send messages to one another. This vulnerability could be exploited to forge CSRF attacks, allowing an attacker to send messages to any user, including administrators, if they interact with a malicious request. This issue has been addressed in version 7.0.1 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

The Wechat Reward WordPress plugin through 1.7 does not sanitise or escape its QR settings, nor has any CSRF check in place, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings and perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks.

The WP Stacker WordPress plugin through 1.8.5 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

The package joplin before 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) due to missing CSRF checks in various forms.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexander Fuchs PHP Everywhere plugin <= 2.0.2 versions.

AdRem NetCrunch 10.6.0.4587 has a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the NetCrunch web client. Successful exploitation requires a logged-in user to open a malicious page and leads to account takeover.

An issue was discovered in Zammad before 3.4.1. The Tag and Link REST API endpoints (for add and delete) lack a CSRF token check.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fonts Plugin Fonts allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Fonts: from n/a through 3.7.7.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Clinics Patient Management System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file users.php of the component User Page. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss RegistrationMagic custom-registration-form-builder-with-submission-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RegistrationMagic: from n/a through <= 6.0.6.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in launchinteractive Merge + Minify + Refresh merge-minify-refresh allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Merge + Minify + Refresh: from n/a through <= 2.14.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in storeapps Stock Manager for WooCommerce woocommerce-stock-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stock Manager for WooCommerce: from n/a through < 3.6.0.

The Pray For Me WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Viszt Péter's Integration for Szamlazz.hu & WooCommerce plugin <= 5.6.3.2 and Csomagpontok és szállítási címkék WooCommerce-hez plugin <= 1.9.0.2 on WordPress.

The Mail Mint plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the create_or_update_note function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or update contact notes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Due to missing sanitization and escaping this can lead to stored Cross-Site Scripting.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via admin/info_deal.php?mudi=rev&nohrefStr=close.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/idcProData_deal.php?mudi=del

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SEMrush CY LTD Semrush Content Toolkit semrush-contentshake allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Semrush Content Toolkit: from n/a through <= 1.1.32.

idccms v1.35 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/infoWeb_deal.php?mudi=del&dataType=newsWeb&dataTypeCN.

CSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute limited actions on behalf of the victim user. User interaction is required.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Bard bardwp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bard: from n/a through <= 1.6.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CodeAstro Online Movie Ticket Booking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The WP-Eggdrop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpegg_updateOptions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Popup box ays-popup-box allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Popup box: from n/a through <= 6.0.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Heateor Support Heateor Social Login heateor-social-login allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Heateor Social Login: from n/a through <= 1.1.39.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sygnoos Popup Builder plugin <= 4.1.11 at WordPress allows an attacker to update plugin settings.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Meks Meks Quick Plugin Disabler meks-quick-plugin-disabler allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Meks Quick Plugin Disabler: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Multiple (13x) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WPKube's Subscribe To Comments Reloaded plugin <= 211130 on WordPress allows attackers to clean up Log archive, download system info file, plugin system settings, plugin options settings, generate a new key, reset all options, change notifications settings, management page settings, comment form settings, manage subscriptions > mass update settings, manage subscriptions > add a new subscription, update subscription, delete Subscription.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /dede/freelist_edit.php.

An issue exists within Piwigo before v.14.2.0 allowing a malicious user to take over the application. This exploit involves chaining a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability to issue a Stored Cross Site Scripting payload stored within an Admin user's dashboard, executing remote JavaScript. This can be used to upload a new PHP file under an administrator and directly call that file from the victim's instance to connect back to a malicious listener.

The Woffice Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'woffice_handle_user_approval_actions' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to approve registration for any user via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

There is a cross-site-request forgery vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS Versions 11.1 and below that may in some cases allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to trick an authorized user into executing unwanted actions via a crafted form. The impact to Confidentiality and Integrity vectors is limited and of low severity.

A vulnerability was found in Moodle which exists due to insufficient validation of the HTTP request origin in course redirect URL. A user's CSRF token was unnecessarily included in the URL when being redirected to a course they have just restored. A remote attacker can trick the victim to visit a specially crafted web page and perform arbitrary actions on behalf of the victim on the vulnerable website. This flaw allows an attacker to perform cross-site request forgery attacks.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Jenkins batch task Plugin 1.19 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read access to retrieve logs, build or delete a batch task.

Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in `refreshToken` mutation, while the token persists in `JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME` cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace `saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token`. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns `JWT_MISSING_TOKEN` instead of `JWT_INVALID_TOKEN`.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in GetResponse plugin <= 5.5.20 at WordPress.

The WordPress plugin Image Slider is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1.121 due to failure to properly check for the existence of a nonce in the function ewic_duplicate_slider. This make it possible for unauthenticated attackers to duplicate existing posts or pages granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Database Backup for WordPress plugin before 2.5.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating the schedule backup settings, which could allow an attacker to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. This could lead to cases where attackers can send backup notification emails to themselves, which contain more details. Or disable the automatic backup schedule

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities leading to single or bulk e-mail entries deletion discovered in Email Tracker WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.2.6).

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in administrate 0.1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the user's OAuth autorization code.

showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)