The LinkWorth WordPress plugin before 3.3.4 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change settings via a CSRF attack.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Creatomatic Ltd CSprite.This issue affects CSprite: from n/a through 1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dang Ngoc Binh Easy Call Now by ThikShare plugin <= 1.1.0 versions.

In CiviCRM before 5.28.1 and CiviCRM ESR before 5.27.5 ESR, the CKEditor configuration form allows CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mammothology WP Full Stripe Free.This issue affects WP Full Stripe Free: from n/a through 7.0.16.

The Elementor Addon Elements plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.12.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the eae_save_elements function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable/disable elementor addon elements via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jeff Starr Simple Statistics for Feeds allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Simple Statistics for Feeds: from n/a through 20250322.

The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.27.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'OnAdminApi_CacheOpBegin' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform several administrative actions, including deleting the cache, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Ninja Forms plugin before 3.4.27.1 for WordPress allows CSRF via services integration.

The RSS Aggregator by Feedzy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_feedzy_post_type_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alexufo Youtube SpeedLoad plugin <= 0.6.3 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EC-CUBE plugin 'Mail Magazine Management Plugin' ver4.0.0 to 4.1.1 (for EC-CUBE 4 series) and ver1.0.0 to 1.0.4 (for EC-CUBE 3 series) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via a specially crafted page, and Mail Magazine Templates and/or transmitted history information may be deleted unintendedly.

A vulnerability was found in destiny.gg chat. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function websocket.Upgrader of the file main.go. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is bebd256fc3063111fb4503ca25e005ebf6e73780. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216521 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Bolt CMS before version 3.7.1 lacked CSRF protection in the preview generating endpoint. Previews are intended to be generated by the admins, developers, chief-editors, and editors, who are authorized to create content in the application. But due to lack of proper CSRF protection, unauthorized users could generate a preview. This has been fixed in Bolt 3.7.1

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plugins and Snippets Simple Page Access Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Simple Page Access Restriction: from n/a through 1.0.32.

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Gym Management System 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blue Coral Chat Bubble – Floating Chat with Contact Chat Icons, Messages, Telegram, Email, SMS, Call me back.This issue affects Chat Bubble – Floating Chat with Contact Chat Icons, Messages, Telegram, Email, SMS, Call me back: from n/a through 2.3.

Concrete CMS 9 before 9.2.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /ccm/system/dialogs/logs/delete_all/submit. An attacker can force an admin user to delete server report logs on a web application to which they are currently authenticated.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Mailer Plugin 391.ve4a_38c1b_cf4b_ and earlier allows attackers to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in IceHrm 31.0.0.OS allows attackers to delete arbitrary users or achieve account takeover via the app/service.php URI.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in CodeAstro Patient Record Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A vulnerability has been found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Paid Memberships Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pmpro_page_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save pages via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability was found in CodeAstro Expense Management System 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VJInfotech Woo Custom and Sequential Order Number plugin <= 2.6.0 versions.

A vulnerability was found in jsnjfz WebStack-Guns 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.3 and Manage Component 8.10 through 8.11 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 271843.

The VR Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the syncCalendar() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger a calendar sync via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Homerunner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the main_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability was found in easyii CMS. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/sign/out. The manipulation leads to cross site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

The Hueman theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta_box() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save metabox data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Opt-in WordPress plugin through 1.4.1 is vulnerable to CSRF which allows changed plugin settings and can be used for sending spam emails.

BloofoxCMS 0.5.2.1 allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via 'mode=settings&page=editor', as demonstrated by use of 'mode=settings&page=editor' to change any file content (Locally/Remotely).

The Import CSV Files WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not sanitise and escaped imported data before outputting them back in a page, and is lacking CSRF check when performing such action as well, resulting in a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

The Radio Buttons for Taxonomies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_single_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save terms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jongmyoung Kim Korea SNS.This issue affects Korea SNS: from n/a through 1.6.3.

The Yougler Blogger Profile Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, v1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yougler-plugin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Customizr theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.3.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the czr_fn_post_fields_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to post fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The LadiApp plugn for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to a missing nonce check on the init_endpoint() function hooked via 'init' in versions up to, and including, 4.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify a variety of settings, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. An attacker can directly modify the 'ladipage_key' which enables them to create new posts on the website and inject malicious web scripts,

The Delete All Comments Easily WordPress plugin through 1.3 is lacking Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) checks, which could result in an unauthenticated attacker making a logged in admin delete all comments from the blog.

The Elementor Addon Elements plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.12.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the eae_save_config function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change configuration settings for the plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Inline Google Maps WordPress plugin through 5.11 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack, and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping

The underConstruction WordPress plugin before 1.20 does not have CSRF check in place when deactivating the construction mode, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack

The Rename wp-login.php WordPress plugin through 2.6.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating the secret login URL, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The MailPress WordPress plugin through 7.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in various places, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, purge log files and more via CSRF attacks

The PDF24 Article To PDF WordPress plugin through 4.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The Ask me WordPress theme before 6.8.2 does not perform CSRF checks for any of its AJAX actions, allowing an attacker to trick logged in users to perform various actions on their behalf on the site.

The Webriti SMTP Mail WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The Cimy Header Image Rotator WordPress plugin through 6.1.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.