The Ever Compare WordPress plugin through 1.2.3 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The HT Event WordPress plugin before 1.4.6 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The HT Politic WordPress plugin before 2.3.8 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The QuickSwish WordPress plugin before 1.1.0 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The HT Slider For Elementor WordPress plugin before 1.4.0 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The Contact Form 7 Widget For Elementor Page Builder & Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 1.1.6 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The WP Plugin Manager WordPress plugin before 1.1.8 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The Free WooCommerce Theme 99fy Extension WordPress plugin before 1.2.8 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The WC Sales Notification WordPress plugin before 1.2.3 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The WP Education WordPress plugin before 1.2.7 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The Coupon Zen WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes ShopLentor plugin <= 2.6.2 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes JustTables plugin <= 1.4.9 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes HT Mega – Absolute Addons For Elementor.This issue affects HT Mega – Absolute Addons For Elementor: from n/a through 2.3.3.

The HT Portfolio WordPress plugin before 1.1.6 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes Extensions For CF7 plugin <= 2.0.8 versions leads to arbitrary plugin activation.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes HT Feed plugin <= 1.2.7 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes HT Menu plugin <= 1.2.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes HT Easy GA4 ( Google Analytics 4 ) plugin <= 1.0.6 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasTheme WishSuite plugin <= 1.3.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes Swatchly plugin <= 1.2.0 versions.

The Preview Link Generator WordPress plugin before 1.0.4 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The WP News WordPress plugin through 1.1.9 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The WP Insurance WordPress plugin before 2.1.4 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The WP Film Studio WordPress plugin before 1.3.5 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes ShopLentor plugin <= 2.5.1 leading to plugin settings change.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelpost 1.7.3 could allow remote attackers to change the admin password.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OpenACS bug-tracker. Affected is an unknown function of the file lib/nav-bar.adp of the component Search. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is aee43e5714cd8b697355ec3bf83eefee176d3fc3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217440.

The Memory Usage plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.98. This is due to missing nonce validation in the wpmemory_install_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to silently install one of the several whitelisted plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Easy restaurant menu manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the nsc_eprm_save_menu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload a menu file via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

ClinicCases 7.3.3 is affected by Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A successful attack would consist of an authenticated user following a malicious link, resulting in arbitrary actions being carried out with the privilege level of the targeted user. This can be exploited to create a secondary administrator account for the attacker.

VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) contains a CSRF bypass vulnerability. A malicious user could execute actions on the vROps platform on behalf of the authenticated victim user.

Yuba u5cms v8.3.5 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component savepage.php. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code.

your_spotify is an open source, self hosted Spotify tracking dashboard. YourSpotify versions < 1.9.0 do not protect the API and login flow against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Attackers can use this to execute CSRF attacks on victims, allowing them to retrieve, modify or delete data on the affected YourSpotify instance. Using repeated CSRF attacks, it is also possible to create a new user on the victim instance and promote the new user to instance administrator if a legitimate administrator visits a website prepared by an attacker. Note: Real-world exploitability of this vulnerability depends on the browser version and browser settings in use by the victim. This issue has been addressed in version 1.9.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in FUEL-CMS 1.4.13 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary code via post ID to /users/delete/2.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

CSRF vulnerability in Smoothwall Express 3.

The WP Fastest Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpfc_remove_cdn_integration_ajax_request_callback function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change cdn settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bytesforall Atahualpa.This issue affects Atahualpa: from n/a through 3.7.24.

Remote Cross-site Request forgery (CSRF) potential has been identified in UCMBD Server version DDM Content Pack V 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.22 CUP7, 10.30, 10.31, 10.32, 10.33, 10.33 CUP2, 11.0 and CMS Server version 2018.05 BACKGROUND which could allow for remote unsafe deserialization and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).

A vulnerability was found in zhenfeng13 My-Blog up to 1.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/tags/save. The manipulation of the argument tagName leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests.

An issue was discovered in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2. Authentication is not required for /index.php?/manage/channel/modifychannel. For example, with a crafted channel name, stored XSS is triggered during a later /index.php?/manage/channel request by an admin.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) and Cisco Cloud Network Controller, formerly Cisco Cloud APIC, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Western Bridge Cobub Razor 0.7.2 via /index.php?/user/createNewUser/, resulting in account creation.

Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 is vulnerable to some CSRF attacks.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Backup Bolt allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Backup Bolt: from n/a through 1.4.1.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in zhenfeng13 My-Blog. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin/configurations/userInfo. The manipulation of the argument yourAvatar/yourName/yourEmail leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-225264.

better_errors is an open source replacement for the standard Rails error page with more information rich error pages. It is also usable outside of Rails in any Rack app as Rack middleware. better_errors prior to 2.8.0 did not implement CSRF protection for its internal requests. It also did not enforce the correct "Content-Type" header for these requests, which allowed a cross-origin "simple request" to be made without CORS protection. These together left an application with better_errors enabled open to cross-origin attacks. As a developer tool, better_errors documentation strongly recommends addition only to the `development` bundle group, so this vulnerability should only affect development environments. Please ensure that your project limits better_errors to the `development` group (or the non-Rails equivalent). Starting with release 2.8.x, CSRF protection is enforced. It is recommended that you upgrade to the latest release, or minimally to "~> 2.8.3". There are no known workarounds to mitigate the risk of using older releases of better_errors.

Due to insufficient CSRF protection, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Monitoring Application), before versions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, may lead to an authenticated user to send unintended request to the web server, leading to Cross Site Request Forgery.