The Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.10.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_update_plugin_params function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin options granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Ecwid by Lightspeed Ecommerce Shopping Cart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.12.27. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ecwid_deactivate_feedback() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send deactivation messages on behalf of a site owner via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart WordPress plugin before 6.12.5 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ecwid Ecommerce Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart.This issue affects Ecwid Ecommerce Shopping Cart: from n/a through 6.12.4.

The SULly WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

Aruba AirWave before 8.0.7 allows bypass of a CSRF protection mechanism.

A vulnerability was found in arnoldle submitByMailPlugin 1.0b2.9 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file edit_list.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.0b2.9a is able to address this issue. The patch is named a739f680a1623d22f52ff1371e86ca472e63756f. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-221495.

IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Jenkins Lucene-Search Plugin 387.v938a_ecb_f7fe9 and earlier does not require POST requests for an HTTP endpoint, allowing attackers to reindex the database.

A vulnerability was found in Video Playlist and Gallery Plugin up to 1.136 on WordPress. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file wp-media-cincopa.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.137 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is ee28e91f4d5404905204c43b7b84a8ffecad932e. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-230264.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SedLex FavIcon Switcher plugin <= 1.2.11 at WordPress allows plugin settings change.

A vulnerability was found in meitar Inline Google Spreadsheet Viewer Plugin up to 0.9.6 on WordPress and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function displayShortcode of the file inline-gdocs-viewer.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 0.9.6.1 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 2a8057df8ca30adc859cecbe5cad21ac28c5b747. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-230234 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

The Booster for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0.1, Booster Plus for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0.1, Booster Elite for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0.1 have either flawed CSRF checks or are missing them completely in numerous places, allowing attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to manipulate an authenticated user into executing malicious actions without their awareness or consent. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a web-based management user to follow a specially crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the authenticated user. These actions include modifying the device configuration, disconnecting the user's session, and executing Command Runner commands.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in StandaloneTech TeraWallet – For WooCommerce plugin <= 1.3.24 leading to plugin settings change.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Noor Alam WordPress Image SEO allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WordPress Image SEO: from n/a through 1.1.4.

The Widget Bundle WordPress plugin through 2.0.0 does not have CSRF checks when logging Widgets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin enable/disable widgets via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Henrique Rodrigues SafetyForms allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects SafetyForms: from n/a through 1.0.0.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Bidding System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /simple-online-bidding-system/admin/ajax.php?action=save_user. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-264465 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gora Tech LLC Cooked Pro allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Cooked Pro: from n/a before 1.8.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin Gibson IdeaPush allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects IdeaPush: from n/a through 8.69.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bhaskar Dhote Back Link Tracker allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Back Link Tracker: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget) allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Twitter Feeds (Tweets Widget): from n/a through 2.2.3.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SearchBlox before 8.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

The Team Circle Image Slider With Lightbox plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the circle_thumbnail_slider_with_lightbox_image_management_func() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to edit image data which can be used to inject malicious JavaScript, along with deleting images, and uploading malicious files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Affiliate Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on various functions including the affiliates_menu method. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete affiliate records, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

IBM Watson Studio Local 1.2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. Several url endpoints are subject to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Please refer to the linked GHSA for the complete list. This issue has been addressed in version 3.2.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

The Permalink Manager Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.2.20.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the extra_actions function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change plugin settings including permalinks and site maps, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Multiple endpoints in GestioIP v3.5.7 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can execute actions via the admin's browser by hosting a malicious URL, leading to data modification, deletion, or exfiltration.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in NodeBB up to 2.5.7. This affects an unknown part of the file /register/abort. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 2.5.8 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 2f9d8c350e54543f608d3d4c8e1a49bbb6cdea38. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-213555.

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different `Content-Type` header value. If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the `is_form_content_type` function call in the CSRF protection logic to include `text/plain`. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on `PUT`, `PATCH` and `DELETE` methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of `?_method= override` feature themselves in their `handle` hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be `PUT`/`PATCH`/`DELETE` when the browser issues a `POST` request.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in RealFaviconGenerator Favicon Plugin up to 1.2.12 on WordPress. This affects the function install_new_favicon of the file admin/class-favicon-by-realfavicongenerator-admin.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.2.13 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 949a1ae7216216350458844f50a72f100b56d4e7. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-230661 was assigned to this vulnerability.

The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 4.2.5 does not have CSRF check when deleting a client, and does not ensure that the object to be deleted is actually a client, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary client and post via a CSRF attack.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in FeehiCMS. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Post My Comment Tab. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-213788.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infomaniak Staff VOD Infomaniak allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VOD Infomaniak: from n/a through 1.5.7.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Hospital Management Center. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file appointment.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-213787.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DarkMySite DarkMySite – Advanced Dark Mode Plugin for WordPress darkmysite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DarkMySite – Advanced Dark Mode Plugin for WordPress: from n/a through 1.2.8.

The application was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, allowing an attacker to coerce users into sending malicious requests to the site to delete their account, or in rare circumstances, hijack their account and create other admin accounts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seriously Simple Podcasting plugin <= 2.16.0 at WordPress, leading to plugin settings change.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in a3rev Software Page View Count plugin <= 2.5.5 on WordPress allows an attacker to reset the plugin settings.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Cargo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mediawiki - Cargo: from 3.6.X before 3.6.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.9 on WordPress.

The WP Prayer II WordPress plugin through 2.4.7 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in All in One SEO plugin <= 4.2.3.1 at WordPress.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Vinoj Cardoza's Captcha Code plugin <= 2.7 at WordPress.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AlgolPlus Advanced Dynamic Pricing for WooCommerce plugin <= 4.1.3 at WordPress.

Cross-site request forgery attacks can be carried out against the Eyes of Network web application, due to an absence of adequate protections. An attacker can, for instance, delete the admin user by directing an authenticated user to the URL https://<target-address>/module/admin_user/index.php?DataTables_Table_0_length=10&user_selected%5B%5D=1&user_mgt_list=delete_user&action=submit by means of a crafted link.

IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

In ftcms 2.1, there is a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PHP page, which causes the attacker to forge a link to trick him to click on a malicious link or visit a page containing attack code, and send a request to the server (corresponding to the identity authentication information) as the victim without the victim's knowledge.