The Hot Linked Image Cacher WordPress plugin through 1.16 is vulnerable to CSRF. This can be used to store / cache images from external domains on the server, which could lead to legal risks (due to copyright violations or licensing rules).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce Product Recommendations plugin <= 2.3.0 versions.

The Insights from Google PageSpeed WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not verify for CSRF before doing various actions such as deleting Custom URLs, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such actions via CSRF attacks

The Stockists Manager for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the stockist_settings_main() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Benedict B., Maciej Gryniuk Hyphenator plugin <= 5.1.5 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PeepSo Community by PeepSo – Social Network, Membership, Registration, User Profiles plugin <= 6.0.9.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images – WebP, AVIF, CDN, Image Optimization plugin <= 3.7.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPDeveloper Essential Addons for Elementor Pro.This issue affects Essential Addons for Elementor Pro: from n/a through 5.4.8.

Intesync Solismed 3.3sp has CSRF.

The Simple Registration for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.8. This is due to missing nonce validation on the role requests admin page handler in the includes/display-role-admin.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to approve pending role requests and escalate user privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Daniel Powney Multi Rating plugin <= 5.0.6 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce Product Add-Ons plugin <= 6.1.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BRANDbrilliance Post State Tags plugin <= 2.0.6 versions.

WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, the `plugin/Permissions/setPermission.json.php` endpoint accepts GET parameters for a state-changing operation that modifies user group permissions. The endpoint has no CSRF token validation, and the application explicitly sets `session.cookie_samesite=None` on session cookies. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft a page with `<img>` tags that, when visited by an admin, silently grant arbitrary permissions to the attacker's user group — escalating the attacker to near-admin access. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

The Mobile browser color select plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_update_data() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability resend an email to an arbitrary address (for example a password reset email could be resent to an attacker controlled email, and allow them to take over an account).

Systemic Lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Token Implementation.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5 .

icingaweb2-module-jira provides integration with Atlassian Jira. Starting in version 1.3.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, template and field configuration forms perform the deletion action before user input is validated, including the cross site request forgery token. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2. There are no known workarounds.

The Bulk Page Creator WordPress plugin before 1.1.4 does not protect its page creation functionalities with nonce checks, which makes them vulnerable to CSRF.

A vulnerability has been found in Guangdong Pythagorean OA Office System up to 4.50.31 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /note/index/delete. The manipulation of the argument id leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230458 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in LabKey Server 19.1.0. It is possible to force a logged-in administrator to execute code through a /reports-viewScriptReport.view CSRF vulnerability.

The IndieAuth plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the `login_form_indieauth()` function and the authorization endpoint at wp-login.php?action=indieauth. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force authenticated users to approve OAuth authorization requests for attacker-controlled applications via a forged request granted they can trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link or visiting a malicious page while logged in. The attacker can then exchange the stolen authorization code for an access token, effectively taking over the victim's account with the granted scopes (create, update, delete).

The Bread & Butter: Gate content + Capture leads + Collect first-party data + Nurture with Ai agents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.11.1374. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uploadImage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files that make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Busybox 1.31.1 - Multiple Known Vulnerabilities.This issue affects BLU-IC2: through 1.19.5; BLU-IC4: through 1.19.5.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Report Portal Plugin 0.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified bearer token authentication.

The Copify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the CopifySettings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Translate WordPress with GTranslate WordPress plugin before 2.9.9 does not have CSRF check in some files, and write debug data such as user's cookies in a publicly accessible file if a specific parameter is used when requesting them. Combining those two issues, an attacker could gain access to a logged in admin cookies by making them open a malicious link or page

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tradebooster Video XML Sitemap Generator.This issue affects Video XML Sitemap Generator: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Piwigo v14.5.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Edit album function.

The Page Builder by AZEXO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.27.133. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'azh_add_post', 'azh_duplicate_post', 'azh_update_post' and 'azh_remove_post' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create, modify, and delete a post via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. The Symfony form component provides a CSRF protection mechanism by using a random token injected in the form and using the session to store and control the token submitted by the user. When using the FrameworkBundle, this protection can be enabled or disabled with the configuration. If the configuration is not specified, by default, the mechanism is enabled as long as the session is enabled. In a recent change in the way the configuration is loaded, the default behavior has been dropped and, as a result, the CSRF protection is not enabled in form when not explicitly enabled, which makes the application sensible to CSRF attacks. This issue has been resolved in the patch versions listed and users are advised to update. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to plugin Settings Update discovered in WP Content Copy Protection & No Right Click WordPress plugin (versions <= 3.4.4).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JoomSky JS Job Manager plugin <= 2.0.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ReCorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS plugin <= 2.1.9 versions.

Subrion CMS 4.2.1 has CSRF in panel/modules/plugins/. The attacker can remotely activate/deactivate the plugins.

A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Faraz Quazi Floating Action Button plugin <= 1.2.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roland Barker, xnau webdesign Participants Database plugin <= 2.4.9 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ultimate Member plugin <= 2.6.0 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Benic Simple Giveaways – Grow your business, email lists and traffic with contests plugin <= 2.46.0 versions.

Repetier Server through 1.4.10 does not have CSRF protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Steinbrecher WP BrowserUpdate plugin <= 4.4.1 versions.

A flaw was found in Moodle in versions 3.11 to 3.11.4, 3.10 to 3.10.8, 3.9 to 3.9.11 and earlier unsupported versions. The "delete badge alignment" functionality did not include the necessary token check to prevent a CSRF risk.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Arshid Easy Hide Login.This issue affects Easy Hide Login: from n/a through 1.0.8.

The AnyComment WordPress plugin before 0.2.18 does not have CSRF checks in the Import and Revert HyperComments features, allowing attackers to make logged in admin perform such actions via a CSRF attack

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) token bypass was identified in PRTG 23.2.84.1566 and earlier versions that allows remote attackers to perform actions with the permissions of a victim user, provided the victim user has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. This could force PRTG to execute different actions, such as creating new users. The severity of this vulnerability is high and received a score of 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Whydonate Whydonate – FREE Donate button – Crowdfunding – Fundraising plugin <= 3.12.15 versions.

A weakness has been identified in givanz Vvveb up to 1.0.7.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. Once again the project maintainer reacted very professional: "I accept the existence of these vulnerabilities. (...) I fixed the code to remove these vulnerabilities and will push the code to github and make a new release."

Linear eMerge E3-Series devices allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

Missing sanitization of HTML attributes in Jupyter notebooks in all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 14.5 allows an attacker to perform arbitrary HTTP POST requests on a user's behalf leading to potential account takeover