The alpine-photo-tile-for-instagram plugin before 1.2.7.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/options-general.php?page=alpine-photo-tile-for-instagram-settings tab parameter.

The Checkout Fields Manager WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Abandoned Cart Recovery WordPress plugin before 1.2.5, Custom Fields for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.4, Custom Order Number WordPress plugin through 1.0.1, Custom Registration Forms Builder WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Advanced Free Gifts WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Gift Registry for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.0.1, Image Watermark for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.1, Order Approval for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.1.0, Order Tracking for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.0.2, Price Calculator for WooCommerce WordPress plugin through 1.0.3, Product Dynamic Pricing and Discounts WordPress plugin through 1.0.6, Product Labels and Stickers WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 have flawed CSRF checks in various places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions

A vulnerability was found in dolibarr_project_timesheet up to 4.5.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Form Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 4.5.6.a is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 082282e9dab43963e6c8f03cfaddd7921de377f4. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216880.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Advanced Booking Calendar plugin <= 1.7.1 on WordPress.

The Peter’s Collaboration E-mails WordPress plugin through 2.2.0 is vulnerable to CSRF due to missing nonce checks. This allows the change of its settings, which can be used to lower the required user level, change texts, the used email address and more.

The BruteBank WordPress plugin before 1.9 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

The Amazon Einzeltitellinks WordPress plugin through 1.3.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping

The Optimize images ALT Text & names for SEO using AI WordPress plugin before 2.0.8 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged-in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

Plesk Obsidian allows a CSRF attack, e.g., via the /api/v2/cli/commands REST API to change an Admin password. NOTE: Obsidian is a specific version of the Plesk product: version numbers were used through version 12, and then the convention was changed so that versions are identified by names ("Obsidian"), not numbers.

The PDF24 Article To PDF WordPress plugin through 4.2.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1 through 10.1.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 284564.

The Discy WordPress theme before 5.2 does not check for CSRF tokens in the AJAX action discy_reset_options, allowing an attacker to trick an admin into resetting the site settings back to defaults.

The WooCommerce Customers Manager WordPress plugin before 30.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin users delete users via CSRF attacks

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Infrastructure and Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) could allow a remote attacker to obtain privileged information and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

The Wholesale Market WordPress plugin before 2.2.2, Wholesale Market for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.1 have a flawed CSRF check when updating their settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin update them via a CSRF attack

Jenkins Pipeline: Stage View Plugin 2.26 and earlier does not correctly encode the ID of 'input' steps when using it to generate URLs to proceed or abort Pipeline builds, allowing attackers able to configure Pipelines to specify 'input' step IDs resulting in URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

The Ask me WordPress theme before 6.8.2 does not perform CSRF checks for any of its AJAX actions, allowing an attacker to trick logged in users to perform various actions on their behalf on the site.

The Email Users WordPress plugin through 4.8.8 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and change the notification settings of arbitrary users

A vulnerability was found in morontt zend-blog-number-2. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file application/forms/Comment.php of the component Comment Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 36b2d4abe20a6245e4f8df7a4b14e130b24d429d. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-215250 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

The New User Email Set Up WordPress plugin through 0.5.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The Bulk Delete Users by Email WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting users, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin delete non admin users by knowing their email via a CSRF attack

The CaPa Protect WordPress plugin through 0.5.8.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and disable the applied protection.

Due to missing checks the Change Uploaded File Permissions WordPress plugin through 4.0.0 is vulnerable to CSRF attacks. This can be used to change the file and folder permissions of any folder. This could be problematic when specific files like ini files are made readable for everyone due to this.

RPCMS v3.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily change the password of any account.

The Seamless Donations WordPress plugin before 5.1.9 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.05. Affected is the function fromSysToolReboot of the file /goform/SysToolReboot. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-257058 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

ProcessWire v3.0.200 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

The Webriti SMTP Mail WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The WP Insurance WordPress plugin before 2.1.4 does not have CSRF check when activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins activate arbitrary plugins present on the blog via a CSRF attack

The OAuth Single Sign On WordPress plugin before 6.24.2 does not have CSRF checks when discarding Identify providers (IdP), which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete all IdP via a CSRF attack

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Energy Management Controller with Cloud Services JH-RVB1 /JH-RV11 Ver.B0.1.9.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to change the product settings.

IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237210.

The WP Championship WordPress plugin before 9.3 is lacking CSRF checks in various places, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin perform unwanted actions, such as create and delete arbitrary teams as well as update the plugin's settings. Due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping, it could also lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting issues

The Registration Forms WordPress plugin before 3.8.1.3 does not have authorisation and CSRF when deleting users via an init action handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary users (along with their posts)

wallabag version 2.5.2 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows attackers to arbitrarily delete user accounts via the /account/delete endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.4.

IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237212.

The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID

The WP Affiliate Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 6.3.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on various functions including the affiliates_menu method. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete affiliate records, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Disable Json API, Login Lockdown, XMLRPC, Pingback, Stop User Enumeration Anti Hacker Scan WordPress plugin before 4.20 does not have proper authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to call it and install and activate arbitrary plugins from wordpress.org

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SEO Panel version 4.10.0 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized user password resets.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL.

The OAuth Client by DigitialPixies WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Matrix Reloaded Plugin 1.1.3 and earlier allows attackers to rebuild previous matrix builds.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins XebiaLabs XL Release Plugin 22.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Oceanwp sticky header plugin <= 1.0.8 on WordPress.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WDJA CMS v1.5.2 allows attackers to arbitrarily add administrator accounts via a crafted URL.

The User registration & user profile WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged-in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.

livehelperchat is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)