RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.7 P2 (6.7.0.2), contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by tricking a victim application user to send arbitrary requests to the vulnerable application to perform server operations with the privileges of the authenticated victim user.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasTheme WishSuite plugin <= 1.3.3 versions.

A vulnerability was found in withstars Books-Management-System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /reader_delete.html. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.11 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191942.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Property Listings versions prior to 3.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189840.

IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189841.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Boone Gorges Anthologize anthologize allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Anthologize: from n/a through <= 0.8.3.

The Add Custom Fields to Media plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the field deletion functionality in the admin display template. The plugin properly validates a nonce for the 'add field' operation (line 24-36), but the 'delete field' operation (lines 38-49) processes the $_GET['delete'] parameter and calls update_option() without any nonce verification. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary custom media fields via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.5, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186283.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sanjeev Mohindra Author Box Plugin With Different Description author-box-with-different-description allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Author Box Plugin With Different Description: from n/a through <= 1.3.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in StylemixThemes eRoom – Zoom Meetings & Webinar (WordPress plugin) <= 1.3.7 allows an attacker to Sync with Zoom Meetings.

IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 174406.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pixelgrade Style Manager style-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Style Manager: from n/a through <= 2.2.7.

The Colibri Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.253. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cp_shortcode_refresh() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The ElasticPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the epio_send_autosuggest_allowed() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send allowed parameters for autosuggest to elasticpress[.]io via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in dazhouda lecms 3.0.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /index.php?my-password-ajax-1 of the component Password Change Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Gutenberg allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Gutenberg: from 0.0.0 before 2.13.0, from 3.0.0 before 3.0.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ashok G Easy Child Theme Creator easy-child-theme-creator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Easy Child Theme Creator: from n/a through <= 1.3.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in illow illow – Cookies Consent lgpd-compliant-cookie-banner allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects illow – Cookies Consent: from n/a through <= 0.2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Map Plugins Basic Interactive World Map basic-interactive-world-map allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Basic Interactive World Map: from n/a through <= 2.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in algol.plus Advanced Dynamic Pricing for WooCommerce advanced-dynamic-pricing-for-woocommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Advanced Dynamic Pricing for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 4.9.3.

IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191391.

The WP Security Question plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in quomodosoft ElementsReady Addons for Elementor element-ready-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ElementsReady Addons for Elementor: from n/a through <= 6.6.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themearile NewsExo newsexo allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects NewsExo: from n/a through <= 7.1.

phpBB 3.2.8 allows a CSRF attack that can modify a group avatar.

The Event Espresso 4 Decaf plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 4.10.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajaxHandler() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to op into notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

JFinalCMS v5.0.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the component /admin/friend_link/save.

The Hueman theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta_box() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save metabox data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Coming Soon & Maintenance Mode Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.57. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_meta_box() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save meta boxes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WooCommerce Checkout & Funnel Builder by CartFlows plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.5.15. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the export_json, import_json, and status_logs_file functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import/export settings and trigger logs showing via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The JetBackup – WP Backup, Migrate & Restore plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.3.9. This is due to missing nonce validation on the backup_guard_get_import_backup() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files to the vulnerable site's server via a forged request, granted they can trick a site's administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AVideo Platform 8.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to reset user passwords by exploiting the password recovery mechanism. Attackers can craft malicious requests to the recoverPass endpoint using the user's recovery token to change account credentials without authentication.

The ImageRecycle pdf & image compression plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the disableOptimization function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable the image optimization setting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The setup resources in Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.8.1 allows remote attackers to complete the setup process via a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

A vulnerability was found in destiny.gg chat. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function websocket.Upgrader of the file main.go. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is bebd256fc3063111fb4503ca25e005ebf6e73780. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216521 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

The RSS Aggregator by Feedzy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_feedzy_post_type_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Hotel Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.10.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_add_order_item() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add an order item via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Kcaptcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the plugin's settings page handler (admin/setting.php). The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field() and the form processing code does not call wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() before saving settings to the database via $wpdb->update(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's CAPTCHA settings (enabling or disabling CAPTCHA on login, registration, lost password, and comment forms) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.

Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the MAC filtering configuration interface. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick users into adding unauthorized MAC addresses to the device's filtering rules without their consent.

Liman 0.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate user account settings without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious HTML forms to change user passwords or modify account information by tricking logged-in users into submitting unauthorized requests.

The Radio Buttons for Taxonomies plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_single_term() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save terms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The MultiVendorX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.5.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the submit_comment() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to submit comments via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Keywordrush Content Egg plugin <= 5.4.0 on WordPress.

Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arbitrary file uploads by leveraging the extension upload functionality without additional validation.

Dreamer_cms 4.1.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via Add permissions to CSRF in Permission Management.

The Call To Action Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.3. This is due to missing nonce validation in the cbox_options_page() function which handles saving, creating, and deleting plugin settings. The form rendered on the settings page does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the save handler does not call wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() before processing settings updates via $wpdb->update(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings such as call-to-action box title, content, link URL, image URL, colors, and other configuration options via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in spicethemes SpicePress spicepress allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects SpicePress: from n/a through <= 2.3.2.5.

The Variation Swatches for WooCommerce plugin, in all versions starting at 1.0.8 up until 1.3.2, contains a vulnerability due to improper nonce verification in its settings reset functionality. The issue exists in the settings_init() function, which processes a reset action based on specific query parameters in the URL. The related delete_settings() function performs a faulty nonce validation check, making the reset operation insecure and susceptible to unauthorized access.