Logo
-

Byte Open Security

(ByteOS Network)

Log In

Sign Up

ByteOS

Security
Vulnerability Details
Registries
Custom Views
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Filters & Tools
Vulnerability Details :

CVE-2023-28113

Summary
Assigner-GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID-a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At-16 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated At-25 Feb, 2025 | 14:55
Rejected At-
Credits

russh may use insecure Diffie-Hellman keys

russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Starting in version 0.34.0 and prior to versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1, Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping. Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case. This issue is fixed in versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1

Vendors
-
Not available
Products
-
Metrics (CVSS)
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Weaknesses
Attack Patterns
Solution/Workaround
References
HyperlinkResource Type
EPSS History
Score
Latest Score
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Percentile
Latest Percentile
-
N/A
No data available for selected date range
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC)
▼Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
cve.org
Assigner:GitHub_M
Assigner Org ID:a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa
Published At:16 Mar, 2023 | 00:00
Updated At:25 Feb, 2025 | 14:55
Rejected At:
▼CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
russh may use insecure Diffie-Hellman keys

russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Starting in version 0.34.0 and prior to versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1, Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping. Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case. This issue is fixed in versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1

Affected Products
Vendor
warp-tech
Product
russh
Versions
Affected
  • From 0.34.0 before 0.34.0* (custom)
  • From 0.36.2 before 0.36.2 (custom)
  • From 0.37.0 before 0.37.0* (custom)
  • From 0.37.1 before 0.37.1 (custom)
Problem Types
TypeCWE IDDescription
CWECWE-20CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
CWECWE-358CWE-358 Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-20
Description: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
Type: CWE
CWE ID: CWE-358
Description: CWE-358 Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6e
N/A
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76
N/A
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81
N/A
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2
N/A
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1
N/A
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg
N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6e
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1
Resource: N/A
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg
Resource: N/A
▼Authorized Data Publishers (ADP)
1. CVE Program Container
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6e
x_transferred
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76
x_transferred
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81
x_transferred
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2
x_transferred
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1
x_transferred
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6e
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1
Resource:
x_transferred
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg
Resource:
x_transferred
2. CISA ADP Vulnrichment
Affected Products
Metrics
VersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Metrics Other Info
Impacts
CAPEC IDDescription
Solutions

Configurations

Workarounds

Exploits

Credits

Timeline
EventDate
Replaced By

Rejected Reason

References
HyperlinkResource
Information is not available yet
▼National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
nvd.nist.gov
Source:security-advisories@github.com
Published At:16 Mar, 2023 | 21:15
Updated At:23 Mar, 2023 | 19:41

russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Starting in version 0.34.0 and prior to versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1, Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping. Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case. This issue is fixed in versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1

CISA Catalog
Date AddedDue DateVulnerability NameRequired Action
N/A
Date Added: N/A
Due Date: N/A
Vulnerability Name: N/A
Required Action: N/A
Metrics
TypeVersionBase scoreBase severityVector
Primary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Secondary3.15.9MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Primary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Type: Secondary
Version: 3.1
Base score: 5.9
Base severity: MEDIUM
Vector:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CPE Matches

russh_project
russh_project
>>russh>>Versions from 0.34.0(inclusive) to 0.36.2(exclusive)
cpe:2.3:a:russh_project:russh:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:*
russh_project
russh_project
>>russh>>0.37.0
cpe:2.3:a:russh_project:russh:0.37.0:-:*:*:*:rust:*:*
russh_project
russh_project
>>russh>>0.37.0
cpe:2.3:a:russh_project:russh:0.37.0:beta1:*:*:*:rust:*:*
Weaknesses
CWE IDTypeSource
CWE-347Primarynvd@nist.gov
CWE-20Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE-358Secondarysecurity-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-347
Type: Primary
Source: nvd@nist.gov
CWE ID: CWE-20
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
CWE ID: CWE-358
Type: Secondary
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Evaluator Description

Evaluator Impact

Evaluator Solution

Vendor Statements

References
HyperlinkSourceResource
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76security-advisories@github.com
Product
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81security-advisories@github.com
Product
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6esecurity-advisories@github.com
Patch
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2security-advisories@github.com
Release Notes
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1security-advisories@github.com
Release Notes
https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpgsecurity-advisories@github.com
Exploit
Vendor Advisory
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L72-L76
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Product
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/blob/master/russh/src/kex/dh/groups.rs#L78-L81
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Product
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/commit/d831a3716d3719dc76f091fcea9d94bd4ef97c6e
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Patch
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.36.2
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/releases/tag/v0.37.1
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Release Notes
Hyperlink: https://github.com/warp-tech/russh/security/advisories/GHSA-cqvm-j2r2-hwpg
Source: security-advisories@github.com
Resource:
Exploit
Vendor Advisory

Change History

0
Information is not available yet

Similar CVEs

9Records found

CVE-2023-43660
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-6
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-4.8||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.04% / 9.96%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2023 | 21:00
Updated-20 Sep, 2024 | 19:34
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
SSH key password bypassed in warpgate

Warpgate is a smart SSH, HTTPS and MySQL bastion host for Linux that doesn't need special client apps. The SSH key verification for a user can be bypassed by sending an SSH key offer without a signature. This allows bypassing authentication under following conditions: 1. The attacker knows the username and a valid target name 2. The attacked knows the user's public key and 3. Only SSH public key authentication is required for the user account. This issue has been addressed in version 0.8.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-warpgate_projectwarp-tech
Product-warpgatewarpgate
CWE ID-CWE-287
Improper Authentication
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2022-46768
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zabbix
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zabbix
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-8.51% / 92.00%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-19 Dec, 2022 | 10:00
Updated-16 Apr, 2025 | 13:50
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
File name information disclosure vulnerability in Zabbix Web Service Report Generation

Arbitrary file read vulnerability exists in Zabbix Web Service Report Generation, which listens on the port 10053. The service does not have proper validation for URL parameters before reading the files.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-ZABBIX
Product-web_service_report_generationzabbix-agent2Zabbix agent 2 (MSI packages)Web Service Report Generation
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2025-6444
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zero Day Initiative
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Zero Day Initiative
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 16.23%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-25 Jun, 2025 | 17:41
Updated-08 Aug, 2025 | 19:18
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
ServiceStack GetErrorResponse Improper Input Validation NTLM Relay Vulnerability

ServiceStack GetErrorResponse Improper Input Validation NTLM Relay Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to relay NTLM credentials on affected installations of ServiceStack. Interaction with this library is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the GetErrorResponse method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to relay NTLM credentials in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25834.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-servicestackServiceStack
Product-servicestackServiceStack
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2019-5592
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 30.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-23 Aug, 2019 | 19:52
Updated-25 Oct, 2024 | 14:05
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

Multiple padding oracle vulnerabilities (Zombie POODLE, GOLDENDOODLE, OpenSSL 0-length) in the CBC padding implementation of FortiOS IPS engine version 5.000 to 5.006, 4.000 to 4.036, 4.200 to 4.219, 3.547 and below, when configured with SSL Deep Inspection policies and with the IPS sensor enabled, may allow an attacker to decipher TLS connections going through the FortiGate via monitoring the traffic in a Man-in-the-middle position.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aFortinet, Inc.
Product-fortios_ips_engineFortinet IPS Engine
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2019-9414
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Android (associated with Google Inc. or Open Handset Alliance)
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Android (associated with Google Inc. or Open Handset Alliance)
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.14% / 35.08%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-27 Sep, 2019 | 18:05
Updated-04 Aug, 2024 | 21:46
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

In wpa_supplicant, there is a possible man in the middle vulnerability due to improper input validation of the basicConstraints field of intermediary certificates. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-111893041

Action-Not Available
Vendor-n/aGoogle LLC
Product-androidAndroid
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2023-34457
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-GitHub, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-1.74% / 81.73%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-05 Jul, 2023 | 19:25
Updated-13 Feb, 2025 | 16:55
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
MechanicalSoup vulnerable to malicious web server reading arbitrary files on client using file input inside HTML form

MechanicalSoup is a Python library for automating interaction with websites. Starting in version 0.2.0 and prior to version 1.3.0, a malicious web server can read arbitrary files on the client using a `<input type="file" ...>` inside HTML form. All users of MechanicalSoup's form submission are affected, unless they took very specific (and manual) steps to reset HTML form field values. Version 1.3.0 contains a patch for this issue.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-mechanicalsoup_projectMechanicalSoupmechanicalsoup_project
Product-mechanicalsoupMechanicalSoupmechanicalsoup
CWE ID-CWE-20
Improper Input Validation
CVE-2021-42017
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Siemens
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.09% / 25.90%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-08 Mar, 2022 | 11:31
Updated-12 Aug, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A new variant of the POODLE attack has left a third-party component vulnerable due to the implementation flaws of the CBC encryption mode in TLS 1.0 to 1.2. If an attacker were to exploit this, they could act as a man-in-the-middle and eavesdrop on encrypted communications.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Siemens AG
Product-ruggedcom_rs969ruggedcom_rs910ruggedcom_rsg2100ruggedcom_rsg2300pruggedcom_rs930lruggedcom_rsg907rruggedcom_rsg910cruggedcom_rs416ruggedcom_rs900wruggedcom_i801ruggedcom_rosruggedcom_m2100ruggedcom_rmcruggedcom_i800ruggedcom_rst2228ruggedcom_rs930wruggedcom_rmc8388ruggedcom_rsg2200ruggedcom_rs900ruggedcom_rs401ruggedcom_rs8000truggedcom_rsg909rruggedcom_rp110ruggedcom_rs910lruggedcom_i802ruggedcom_m969ruggedcom_rs910wruggedcom_rsg2100pruggedcom_rs8000ruggedcom_rst916pruggedcom_rs900gpruggedcom_rs900lruggedcom_rmc40ruggedcom_rsl910ruggedcom_rmc41ruggedcom_rsg920pruggedcom_rs920wruggedcom_rs416v2ruggedcom_rs8000aruggedcom_rsg2300ruggedcom_rst916cruggedcom_m2200ruggedcom_rs400ruggedcom_rst2228pruggedcom_rmc20ruggedcom_rs8000hruggedcom_rsg908cruggedcom_i803ruggedcom_rsg2488ruggedcom_rs900gruggedcom_rsg2288ruggedcom_rs920lruggedcom_rs940gruggedcom_rmc30RUGGEDCOM RS8000RUGGEDCOM RS900LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS930WRUGGEDCOM RS910LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600RUGGEDCOM RS920WRUGGEDCOM RS940GRUGGEDCOM RS900FRUGGEDCOM M2200RUGGEDCOM RS910RUGGEDCOM RSG908CRUGGEDCOM RS900RUGGEDCOM RS400FRUGGEDCOM RS920LRUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100RUGGEDCOM RS8000HRUGGEDCOM RS400RUGGEDCOM RS8000TRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM M969RUGGEDCOM RS416PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GRUGGEDCOM M2100FRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XXRUGGEDCOM RS900WRUGGEDCOM RS8000ARUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.XRUGGEDCOM i803RUGGEDCOM RSG910CRUGGEDCOM RSG2300PFRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2488FRUGGEDCOM RS969RUGGEDCOM RSG2200RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG909RRUGGEDCOM RS416RUGGEDCOM RS416FRUGGEDCOM RS900GPFRUGGEDCOM RST2228PRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PRUGGEDCOM i800RUGGEDCOM RS416PRUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XXRUGGEDCOM RST916PRUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS1600FRUGGEDCOM RSL910RUGGEDCOM RSG907RRUGGEDCOM RS930LRUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS910WRUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RSG2100PFRUGGEDCOM RS900GPRUGGEDCOM RST916CRUGGEDCOM RSG2100FRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.XRUGGEDCOM i802RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.XRUGGEDCOM RS940GFRUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RST2228RUGGEDCOM RS401RUGGEDCOM RMC30RUGGEDCOM RS900GFRUGGEDCOM M2100RUGGEDCOM RSG2300FRUGGEDCOM RS1600TRUGGEDCOM M969FRUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM M2200FRUGGEDCOM RP110RUGGEDCOM RSG2200FRUGGEDCOM i801RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.XRUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X
CWE ID-CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
CWE ID-CWE-358
Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard
CVE-2021-26100
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Fortinet, Inc.
CVSS Score-5.9||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.11% / 29.84%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-09 Jul, 2021 | 18:23
Updated-25 Oct, 2024 | 13:57
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available

A missing cryptographic step in the Identity-Based Encryption service of FortiMail before 7.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who intercepts the encrypted messages to manipulate them in such a way that makes the tampering and the recovery of the plaintexts possible.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-Fortinet, Inc.
Product-fortimailFortinet FortiMail
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-49393
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
ShareView Details
Matching Score-4
Assigner-Red Hat, Inc.
CVSS Score-6.5||MEDIUM
EPSS-0.05% / 15.94%
||
7 Day CHG~0.00%
Published-12 Nov, 2024 | 01:55
Updated-16 Jul, 2025 | 12:15
Rejected-Not Available
Known To Be Used In Ransomware Campaigns?-Not Available
KEV Added-Not Available
KEV Action Due Date-Not Available
Mutt: neomutt: to and cc email header fields are not protected by cryptographic signing

In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality.

Action-Not Available
Vendor-neomuttmuttRed Hat, Inc.
Product-muttneomuttenterprise_linuxRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
CWE ID-CWE-347
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Details not found