IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 could be vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 198241.
IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager Virtual Appliance 2.2.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 144348.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Forms Experience Builder 8.5.x and 8.6.x before 8.6.3.1, in an unspecified non-default configuration, allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM BigFix Remote Control before 9.1.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.
IBM Spectrum Protect Operations Center 8.1.0.000 through 8.1.13.xxx is vulnerable to reverse tabnabbing where it could allow a page linked to from within Operations Center to rewrite it. An administrator could enter a link to a malicious URL that another administrator could then click. Once clicked, that malicious URL could then rewrite the original page with a phishing page. IBM X-Force ID: 220139.
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 289234.
IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.17 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 175411.
IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191391.
IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189840.
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0 and 7.6.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 182436.
IBM Maximo Spatial Asset Management 7.6.0.3, 7.6.0.4, 7.6.0.5, and 7.6.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186024.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.5, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.3, and 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 186283.
IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 10.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 141622.
IBM Application Performance Management - Response Time Monitoring Agent (IBM Monitoring 8.1.4) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 139598.
IBM BigFix Platform 9.2 and 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 140761.
IBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM Spectrum Virtualize and IBM FlashSystem products ( 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.6.1, 7.7, 7.7.1, 7.8, 7.8.1, 8.1, and 8.1.1) are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 139474.
IBM InfoSphere Information Server 9.1, 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-frame scripting which is a vulnerability that allows an attacker to load Information Server components inside an HTML iframe tag on a malicious page. The attacker could use this weakness to devise a Clickjacking attack to conduct phishing, frame sniffing, social engineering or Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 139360.
IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
IBM Business Process Manager 8.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 136783.
IBM Jazz for Service Management (IBM Tivoli Components 1.1.3) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 135519.
IBM Jazz for Service Management (IBM Tivoli Components 1.1.3) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 133140.
IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager 2.6 and 2.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 133639.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Integrated Solutions Console (aka administrative console) in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.0.0.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that disable certain security options via an Edit action to console/adminSecurityDetail.do followed by a save action to console/syncworkspace.do.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Local Management Interface (LMI) on the IBM Proventia Network Mail Security System (PNMSS) appliance with firmware before 2.5.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change settings or (2) conduct denial of service attacks.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administrative console in the Security component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.0.2 before 6.0.2.39, 6.1 before 6.1.0.29, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.7 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
IBM Security Verify Information Queue 10.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 230812.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web administration interface in the Advanced Management Module (AMM) on the IBM BladeCenter, including the BladeCenter H with BPET36H 54, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators, as demonstrated by a power-off request to the private/blade_power_action script.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Openstack Heat Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
The OAuth Client by DigitialPixies WordPress plugin through 1.1.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions.
The dynamic-widgets plugin before 1.5.11 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/themes.php?page=dynwid-config page_limit parameter.
The Advanced Import WordPress plugin before 1.3.8 does not have CSRF check when installing and activating plugins, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin install arbitrary plugins from WordPress.org, and activate arbitrary ones from the blog via CSRF attacks
The wplegalpages plugin before 1.1 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/admin.php?page=legal-pages lp-domain-name, lp-business-name, lp-phone, lp-street, lp-city-state, lp-country, lp-email, lp-address, or lp-niche parameters.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified username and password.
The multicons plugin before 3.0 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/options-general.php?page=multicons%2Fmulticons.php global_url or admin_url parameter.
The bookmarkify plugin 2.9.2 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via wp-admin/options-general.php?page=bookmarkify.php.
The wp-social-bookmarking-light plugin before 1.7.10 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via configuration parameters for Tumblr, Twitter, Facebook, etc. in wp-admin/options-general.php?page=wp-social-bookmarking-light%2Fmodules%2Fadmin.php.
The qtranslate-x plugin before 3.4.4 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/options-general.php?page=qtranslate-x json_config_files or json_custom_i18n_config parameter.
The Webmaster Tools Verification WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when disabling plugins, allowing unauthenticated users to disable arbitrary plugins
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins XebiaLabs XL Release Plugin 22.0.0 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Oceanwp sticky header plugin <= 1.0.8 on WordPress.
The googmonify plugin through 0.5.1 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS via the wp-admin/options-general.php?page=googmonify.php PID or AID parameter.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Beaker builder Plugin 1.10 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins vRealize Orchestrator Plugin 3.0 and earlier allows attackers to send an HTTP POST request to an attacker-specified URL.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins ThreadFix Plugin 1.5.4 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Booking Core - Ultimate Booking System Booking Core 1.7.0 . The CSRF token is not being validated when the request is sent as a GET method. This results in an unauthorized change in the user's email ID, which can later be used to reset the password. The new password will be sent to a modified email ID.
Shenzhen Tenda AC7 firmware version V03.03.03.01_cn and prior does not implement CSRF protections for administrative functions in the web management interface. The interface does not enforce anti-CSRF tokens or robust origin validation, which can allow an attacker to induce a logged-in administrator to perform unintended state-changing requests and modify router settings.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin 1.25.3 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified HTTP server.
The Open eClass platform (formerly known as GUnet eClass) is a complete course management system. Prior to version 4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple teacher-restricted endpoints allows attackers to induce authenticated teachers to perform unintended actions, such as modifying assignment grades, via crafted requests. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.
Marval MSM v14.19.0.12476 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An attacker can disable the 2FA by sending the user a malicious form.