Fastify is a web framework with minimal overhead and plugin architecture. The attacker can use the incorrect `Content-Type` to bypass the `Pre-Flight` checking of `fetch`. `fetch()` requests with Content-Type’s essence as "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "multipart/form-data", or "text/plain", could potentially be used to invoke routes that only accepts `application/json` content type, thus bypassing any CORS protection, and therefore they could lead to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack. This issue has been patched in version 4.10.2 and 3.29.4. As a workaround, implement Cross-Site Request Forgery protection using `@fastify/csrf'.

This affects the package fastify-csrf before 3.0.0. 1. The generated cookie used insecure defaults, and did not have the httpOnly flag on: cookieOpts: { path: '/', sameSite: true } 2. The CSRF token was available in the GET query parameter

fastify-csrf is an open-source plugin helps developers protect their Fastify server against CSRF attacks. Versions of fastify-csrf prior to 3.1.0 have a "double submit" mechanism using cookies with an application deployed across multiple subdomains, e.g. "heroku"-style platform as a service. Version 3.1.0 of the fastify-csrf fixes it. the vulnerability. The user of the module would need to supply a `userInfo` when generating the CSRF token to fully implement the protection on their end. This is needed only for applications hosted on different subdomains.

@fastify/passport is a port of passport authentication library for the Fastify ecosystem. The CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forger) protection enforced by the `@fastify/csrf-protection` library, when combined with `@fastify/passport` in affected versions, can be bypassed by network and same-site attackers. `fastify/csrf-protection` implements the synchronizer token pattern (using plugins `@fastify/session` and `@fastify/secure-session`) by storing a random value used for CSRF token generation in the `_csrf` attribute of a user's session. The `@fastify/passport` library does not clear the session object upon authentication, preserving the `_csrf` attribute between pre-login and authenticated sessions. Consequently, CSRF tokens generated before authentication are still valid. Network and same-site attackers can thus obtain a CSRF token for their pre-session, fixate that pre-session in the victim's browser via cookie tossing, and then perform a CSRF attack after the victim authenticates. As a solution, newer versions of `@fastify/passport` include the configuration options: `clearSessionOnLogin (default: true)` and `clearSessionIgnoreFields (default: ['passport', 'session'])` to clear all the session attributes by default, preserving those explicitly defined in `clearSessionIgnoreFields`.

@fastify/csrf-protection is a plugin which helps protect Fastify servers against CSRF attacks. The CSRF protection enforced by the @fastify/csrf-protection library in combination with @fastify/cookie can be bypassed from network and same-site attackers under certain conditions. @fastify/csrf-protection supports an optional userInfo parameter that binds the CSRF token to the user. This parameter has been introduced to prevent cookie-tossing attacks as a fix for CVE-2021-29624. Whenever userInfo parameter is missing, or its value can be predicted for the target user account, network and same-site attackers can 1. fixate a _csrf cookie in the victim's browser, and 2. forge CSRF tokens that are valid for the victim's session. This allows attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism. As a fix, @fastify/csrf-protection starting from version 6.3.0 (and v4.1.0) includes a server-defined secret hmacKey that cryptographically binds the CSRF token to the value of the _csrf cookie and the userInfo parameter, making tokens non-spoofable by attackers. This protection is effective as long as the userInfo parameter is unique for each user. This is patched in versions 6.3.0 and v4.1.0. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may use a random, non-predictable userInfo parameter for each user as a mitigation.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on NTT EAST Hikari Denwa routers with firmware PR-400MI, RT-400MI, and RV-440MI 07.00.1006 and earlier and NTT WEST Hikari Denwa routers with firmware PR-400MI, RT-400MI, and RV-440MI 07.00.1005 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

The Joomla extension Events Booking prior version 5.8.0 had an frontend file upload endpoint that lacked CSRF protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in vcita Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita meeting-scheduler-by-vcita allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Online Booking & Scheduling Calendar for WordPress by vcita: from n/a through <= 4.5.5.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /admin/admin.inc.php component of EasyImages 2.0 v2.8.6 and below allows attackers to escalate privileges to Administrator via user interaction with a malicious web page.

CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests.

A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V1.0 SP1). The web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack. This could allow an attacker to manipulate the SINEC NMS configuration by tricking an unsuspecting user with administrative privileges to click on a malicious link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Webbjocke Simple Wp Sitemap.This issue affects Simple Wp Sitemap: from n/a through 1.2.1.

The VikBooking Hotel Booking Engine & PMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change plugin access privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation allows attackers with subscriber-level privileges and above to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AllskyTeam AllSky v2024.12.06_06 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via function handle_interface_POST_and_status.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the administrator functions in WebsiteBaker 2.8.1 and earlier due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions.

The PageLines theme 1.1.4 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin-post.php?page=pagelines CSRF.

The leenkme plugin before 2.6.0 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin.php?page=leenkme_facebook CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Proticaret E-Commerce: before v6.0 NOTE: According to the vendor, fixing process is still ongoing for v4.05.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in version 3.83 of binary-husky/gpt_academic allows an attacker to trick a user into uploading files without their consent, exploiting their session. This can lead to unauthorized file uploads and potential system compromise. The uploaded file can contain malicious scripts, leading to stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. Through stored XSS, an attacker can steal information about the victim and perform any action on their behalf.

Open OnDemand before 1.5.7 and 1.6.x before 1.6.22 allows CSRF.

The VikRentCar Car Rental Management System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'save' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change plugin access privileges via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation allows attackers with subscriber-level privileges and above to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible.

The Nifty Newsletters WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the sola_nl_wp_head function found in the ~/sola-newsletters.php file which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 4.0.23.

CTparental before 4.45.03 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in the CTparental admin panel. By combining CSRF with XSS, an attacker can trick the administrator into clicking a link that cancels the filtering for all standard users.

The Ads Pro Plugin - Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.89. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bsaCreateAdTemplate function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in akhlesh-nagar, a.Ankit Social Media Icons Widget plugin <= 1.6 versions.

The simple-membership plugin before 3.3.3 for WordPress has multiple CSRF issues.

The kento-post-view-counter plugin through 2.8 for WordPress has wp-admin/admin.php?page=kentopvc_settings CSRF.

The fluid-responsive-slideshow plugin before 2.2.7 for WordPress has frs_save CSRF with resultant stored XSS.

A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.2 (All versions only if web components are used), COMOS V10.3 (All versions < V10.3.3.3 only if web components are used), COMOS V10.4 (All versions < V10.4.1 only if web components are used). The COMOS Web component of COMOS uses a flawed implementation of CSRF prevention. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform cross-site request forgery attacks.

The fossura-tag-miner plugin before 1.1.5 for WordPress has CSRF.

The multisite-post-duplicator plugin before 1.1.3 for WordPress has wp-admin/tools.php?page=mpd CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in theDotstore Enhanced Ecommerce Google Analytics for WooCommerce plugin <= 3.7.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SendPress Newsletters plugin <= 1.22.3.31 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Contact Form 7 – PayPal & Stripe Add-on plugin <= 1.9.3 versions.

The HQ Rental Software plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the displaySettingsPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor.

IBM Cloud Private 2.1.0, 3.1.0, 3.1.1, and 3.1.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158338.

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 159132.

The Appointment Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.3.83 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as adding a booking to the calendar without paying.

The WooCommerce Report plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sean Barton (Tortoise IT) SB Child List plugin <= 4.5 versions.

MicroPyramid Django-CRM 0.2 allows CSRF for /users/create/, /users/##/edit/, and /accounts/##/delete/ URIs.

A vulnerability was found in Qidianbang qdbcrm 1.1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /user/edit?id=2 of the component Password Reset. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-252032. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

The Innovs HR WordPress plugin through 1.0.3.4 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as adding them as employees.

Jeesns 1.4.2 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to escalate privileges and perform sensitive program operations.

The cp-contact-form-with-paypal (aka CP Contact Form with PayPal) plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS, related to cp_contactformpp.php and cp_contactformpp_admin_int_list.inc.php.

The unite-gallery-lite plugin before 1.5 for WordPress has CSRF and SQL injection via wp-admin/admin-ajax.php in a unitegallery_ajax_action operation.

firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

yourls is vulnerable to Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames