A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Easergy T300 (Firmware version 1.5.2 and older) which could allow an attacker to execute malicious commands on behalf of a legitimate user when xsrf-token data is intercepted.

An issue was discovered in MediaWiki before 1.35.5, 1.36.x before 1.36.3, and 1.37.x before 1.37.1. MassEditRegex allows CSRF.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Gitea before 1.5.2 via API routes.This can be dangerous especially with state altering POST requests.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in Catfish <=6.1.* when you upload an html file containing CSRF on the website that uses a google editor; you can specify the menu url address as your malicious url address in the Add Menu column.

An issue was discovered in PONTON X/P Messenger before 3.11.2. Anti-CSRF tokens are globally valid, making the web application vulnerable to a weakened version of CSRF, where an arbitrary token of a low-privileged user (such as operator) can be used to confirm actions of higher-privileged ones (such as xpadmin).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPClever WPC Product Bundles for WooCommerce.This issue affects WPC Product Bundles for WooCommerce: from n/a through 7.3.1.

The Process Steps Template Designer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to conduct unspecified attacks via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /system/site/userconfig_updagte.

The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A flaw was found in Moodle in versions 3.11 to 3.11.3, 3.10 to 3.10.7, 3.9 to 3.9.10 and earlier unsupported versions. The "delete related badge" functionality did not include the necessary token check to prevent a CSRF risk.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailerLite MailerLite – WooCommerce integration.This issue affects MailerLite – WooCommerce integration: from n/a through 2.0.8.

The Crisp Live Chat WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the crisp_plugin_settings_page function found in the ~/crisp.php file, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 0.31.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NitroPack Inc. NitroPack – Cache & Speed Optimization for Core Web Vitals, Defer CSS & JavaScript, Lazy load Images.This issue affects NitroPack – Cache & Speed Optimization for Core Web Vitals, Defer CSS & JavaScript, Lazy load Images: from n/a through 1.10.2.

Team Password Manager (aka TeamPasswordManager) before 10.135.236 has a CSRF vulnerability during import.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in exists in WTC-C1167GC-B v1.17 and earlier, and WTC-C1167GC-W v1.17 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.

In GNU Mailman before 2.1.38, a list member or moderator can get a CSRF token and craft an admin request (using that token) to set a new admin password or make other changes.

The Better Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import settings via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Faboba Falang multilanguage for WordPress plugin <= 1.3.39 versions.

SPIP 4.0.0 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/public/aiguiller.php, ecrire/public/balises.php, ecrire/balise/formulaire_.php. To exploit the vulnerability, a visitor must visit a malicious website which redirects to the SPIP website. It is also possible to combine XSS vulnerabilities in SPIP 4.0.0 to exploit it. The vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to execute malicious code without the knowledge of the user on the website (CSRF).

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.4.

Elcomplus SmartPTT SCADA Server web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Awesome Support Team Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin.This issue affects Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin: from n/a through 6.1.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bright Plugins Block IPs for Gravity Forms.This issue affects Block IPs for Gravity Forms: from n/a through 1.0.1.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in katlings pyambic-pentameter. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 974f21aa1b2527ef39c8afe1a5060548217deca8. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-216498 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rocket Elements Split Test For Elementor.This issue affects Split Test For Elementor: from n/a through 1.6.9.

A CVE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could allow an attacker to impersonate the user or carry out actions on their behalf when crafted malicious parameters are submitted in POST requests sent to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2)

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in phpRedisAdmin up to 1.17.3. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.18.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is b9039adbb264c81333328faa9575ecf8e0d2be94. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216471.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RedNao WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder.This issue affects WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder: from n/a through 1.2.101.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rise Themes Rise Blocks – A Complete Gutenberg Page Builder.This issue affects Rise Blocks – A Complete Gutenberg Page Builder: from n/a through 3.1.

The Contact Form With Captcha WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation in the ~/cfwc-form.php file during contact form submission, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 1.6.2.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Movable Type series (Movable Type 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type 7), Movable Type Advanced 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type Advanced 7), Movable Type for AWS 7 r.4606 (7.2.1) and earlier (Movable Type for AWS 7), Movable Type 6.5.3 and earlier (Movable Type 6.5), Movable Type Advanced 6.5.3 and earlier (Movable Type Advanced 6.5), Movable Type 6.3.11 and earlier (Movable Type 6.3), Movable Type Advanced 6.3.11 and earlier (Movable Type 6.3), Movable Type Premium 1.29 and earlier, and Movable Type Premium Advanced 1.29 and earlier) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exits in hostel management system 2.1 via the name field in my-profile.php. Chaining to this both vulnerabilities leads to account takeover.

Teedy <= 1.12 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF), due to the lack of CSRF protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 HUSKY – Products Filter for WooCommerce (formerly WOOF).This issue affects HUSKY – Products Filter for WooCommerce (formerly WOOF): from n/a through 1.3.4.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marios Alexandrou Add Any Extension to Pages.This issue affects Add Any Extension to Pages: from n/a through 1.4.

showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PixelYourSite Product Catalog Feed by PixelYourSite.This issue affects Product Catalog Feed by PixelYourSite: from n/a through 2.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kevin Ohashi WPPerformanceTester.This issue affects WPPerformanceTester: from n/a through 2.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Innovative Solutions Fix My Feed RSS Repair.This issue affects Fix My Feed RSS Repair: from n/a through 1.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Creatomatic Ltd CSprite.This issue affects CSprite: from n/a through 1.1.

A vulnerability was found in Navetti PricePoint 4.6.0.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.7.0.0 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Lexiglot through 2014-11-20 allows CSRF.

ECOA BAS controller has a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability, thus authenticated attacker can remotely place a forged request at a malicious web page and execute CRUD commands (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) to perform arbitrary operations in the system.

calibre-web is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Chamilo LMS 1.11.14 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on victim hosts via user interaction with a crafted URL.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Streama up to and including v1.10.3. The application does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as uploading local files. As a result, attackers could make a logged-in administrator upload arbitrary local files via a CSRF attack and send them to the attacker.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.5.

solidus_auth_devise provides authentication services for the Solidus webstore framework, using the Devise gem. In affected versions solidus_auth_devise is subject to a CSRF vulnerability that allows user account takeover. All applications using any version of the frontend component of `solidus_auth_devise` are affected if `protect_from_forgery` method is both: Executed whether as: A `before_action` callback (the default) or A `prepend_before_action` (option `prepend: true` given) before the `:load_object` hook in `Spree::UserController` (most likely order to find). Configured to use `:null_session` or `:reset_session` strategies (`:null_session` is the default in case the no strategy is given, but `rails --new` generated skeleton use `:exception`). Users should promptly update to `solidus_auth_devise` version `2.5.4`. Users unable to update should if possible, change their strategy to `:exception`. Please see the linked GHSA for more workaround details.

Dada Mail is a web-based e-mail list management system. In affected versions a bad actor could give someone a carefully crafted web page via email, SMS, etc, that - when visited, allows them control of the list control panel as if the bad actor was logged in themselves. This includes changing any mailing list password, as well as the Dada Mail Root Password - which could effectively shut out actual list owners of the mailing list and allow the bad actor complete and unfettered control of your mailing list. This vulnerability also affects profile logins. For this vulnerability to work, the target of the bad actor would need to be logged into the list control panel themselves. This CSRF vulnerability in Dada Mail affects all versions of Dada Mail v11.15.1 and below. Although we know of no known CSRF exploits that have happened in the wild, this vulnerability has been confirmed by our testing, and by a third party. Users are advised to update to version 11.16.0.

TYPO3 is an open source PHP based web content management system released under the GNU GPL. It has been discovered that the new TYPO3 v11 feature that allows users to create and share deep links in the backend user interface is vulnerable to cross-site-request-forgery. The impact is the same as described in TYPO3-CORE-SA-2020-006 (CVE-2020-11069). However, it is not limited to the same site context and does not require the attacker to be authenticated. In a worst case scenario, the attacker could create a new admin user account to compromise the system. To successfully carry out an attack, an attacker must trick his victim to access a compromised system. The victim must have an active session in the TYPO3 backend at that time. The following Same-Site cookie settings in $GLOBALS[TYPO3_CONF_VARS][BE][cookieSameSite] are required for an attack to be successful: SameSite=strict: malicious evil.example.org invoking TYPO3 application at good.example.org and SameSite=lax or none: malicious evil.com invoking TYPO3 application at example.org. Update your instance to TYPO3 version 11.5.0 which addresses the problem described.