The Jetpack Scan team identified a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in the Patreon WordPress plugin before 1.7.0, allowing attackers to make a logged in user overwrite or create arbitrary user metadata on the victim’s account once visited. If exploited, this bug can be used to overwrite the “wp_capabilities” meta, which contains the affected user account’s roles and privileges. Doing this would essentially lock them out of the site, blocking them from accessing paid content.
Several AJAX actions available in the Workreap WordPress theme before 2.2.2 lacked CSRF protections, as well as allowing insecure direct object references that were not validated. This allows an attacker to trick a logged in user to submit a POST request to the vulnerable site, potentially modifying or deleting arbitrary objects on the target site.
The Support Board WordPress plugin before 3.3.6 does not have any CSRF checks in actions handled by the include/ajax.php file, which could allow attackers to make logged in users do unwanted actions. For example, make an admin delete arbitrary files
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VibeThemes WPLMS theme <= 4.900 versions.
The Images to WebP WordPress plugin before 1.9 does not have CSRF checks in place when performing some administrative actions, which could result in modification of plugin settings, Denial-of-Service, as well as arbitrary image conversion
The Print My Blog WordPress Plugin before 3.4.2 does not enforce nonce (CSRF) checks, which allows attackers to make logged in administrators deactivate the Print My Blog plugin and delete all saved data for that plugin by tricking them to open a malicious link
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Maccms v10 via admin.php/admin/admin/del/ids/<id>.html allows authenticated attackers to delete all users.
A CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could induce users to perform unintended actions, leading to the override of the system�s configurations when an attacker persuades a user to visit a rogue website. Affected Product: spaceLYnk (V2.6.2 and prior), Wiser for KNX (formerly homeLYnk) (V2.6.2 and prior), fellerLYnk (V2.6.2 and prior)
DBHcms v1.2.0 has no CSRF protection mechanism,as demonstrated by CSRF for an /index.php?dbhcms_pid=-80&deletemenu=9 can delete any menu.
A CSRF vulnerability exists in the management page of a ZTE product.The vulnerability is caused because the management page does not fully verify whether the request comes from a trusted user. The attacker could submit a malicious request to the affected device to delete the data. This affects: ZXCLOUD iRAI All versions up to KVM-ProductV6.03.04
Cross-site request forgery in OpenOversight 0.6.4 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files on the file system via a crafted URL or HTTP request through a victim’s session.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Access Demo Importer <= 1.0.7 on WordPress allows an attacker to reset all data (posts / pages / media).
Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in issabel-pbx v.4.0.0-6 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted script to the deleteuser function.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in web GUI of Secomea GateManager allows an attacker to execute malicious code. This issue affects: Secomea GateManager All versions prior to 9.4.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco SD-WAN vManage Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. These actions could include modifying the system configuration and deleting accounts.
TenderDocTransfer developed by Chunghwa Telecom has a Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system.
The topm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system.
TenderDocTransfer from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Write vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection for the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to write arbitrary files to any path on the user's system.
The WP Abstracts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on multiple functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in Subrion CMS 4.2.1 that allows a remote attacker to remove files on the server without a victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated user to visit an attacker's web page. The application fails to validate the CSRF token for a GET request. An attacker can craft a panel/uploads/read.json?cmd=rm URL (removing this token) and send it to the victim.