In MtkEmail, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to fragment injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07216598; Issue ID: ALPS07216598.

In music service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to elevation of privilege in contacts service with no additional execution privileges needed.

In wl_update_hidden_ap_ie() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

there is a possible biometric bypass due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In prepare_response_locked of lwis_transaction.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In startListeningForDeviceStateChanges, there is a possible Permission Bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In prepare_response of lwis_periodic_io.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In Exynos_parsing_user_data_registered_itu_t_t35 of VendorVideoAPI.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Improper input validation in DSP driver prior to SMR Apr-2022 Release 1 allows out-of-bounds write by integer overflow.

Improper validation vulnerability in VerifyCredentialResponse prior to SMR Apr-2022 Release 1 allows attackers to launch certain activities.

Improper validation vulnerability in SemBlurInfo prior to SMR Apr-2022 Release 1 allows attackers to launch certain activities.

Improper access control and path traversal vulnerability in Storage Manager and Storage Manager Service prior to SMR Apr-2022 Release 1 allow local attackers to access arbitrary system files without a proper permission. The patch adds proper validation logic to prevent arbitrary files access.

Improper validation vulnerability in SemSuspendDialogInfo prior to SMR Apr-2022 Release 1 allows attackers to launch certain activities.

In ppcfw_enable of ppcfw.c, there is a possible EoP due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

there is a possible DCK won't be deleted after factory reset due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In checkDebuggingDisallowed of DeviceVersionFragment.java, there is a     possible way to access adb before SUW completion due to an insecure default     value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional     execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for     exploitation

In gpu_pixel_handle_buffer_liveness_update_ioctl of private/google-modules/gpu/mali_kbase/mali_kbase_core_linux.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In gpu_pixel_handle_buffer_liveness_update_ioctl of private/google-modules/gpu/mali_kbase/platform/pixel/pixel_gpu_slc.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In parseSecurityParamsFromXml of XmlUtil.java, there is a possible bypass of user specified wifi encryption protocol due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-272755865

In checkKeyIntentParceledCorrectly of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary activities using system privileges due to Parcel Mismatch. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple functions of btm_ble_gap.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In CreateAudioBroadcast of broadcaster.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In cta, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07025415; Issue ID: ALPS07025415.

PendingIntent hijacking vulnerability in Wearable Manager Installer prior to SMR Mar-2022 Release 1 allows local attackers to perform unauthorized action without permission via hijacking the PendingIntent.

In CreateAudioBroadcast of broadcaster.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In ims, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a parcel format mismatch. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07319095; Issue ID: ALPS07319095.

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. In affected versions the code for `tf.raw_ops.SaveV2` does not properly validate the inputs and an attacker can trigger a null pointer dereference. The [implementation](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/8d72537c6abf5a44103b57b9c2e22c14f5f49698/tensorflow/core/kernels/save_restore_v2_ops.cc) uses `ValidateInputs` to check that the input arguments are valid. This validation would have caught the illegal state represented by the reproducer above. However, the validation uses `OP_REQUIRES` which translates to setting the `Status` object of the current `OpKernelContext` to an error status, followed by an empty `return` statement which just terminates the execution of the function it is present in. However, this does not mean that the kernel execution is finalized: instead, execution continues from the next line in `Compute` that follows the call to `ValidateInputs`. This is equivalent to lacking the validation. We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 9728c60e136912a12d99ca56e106b7cce7af5986. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.6.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.5.1, TensorFlow 2.4.3, and TensorFlow 2.3.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

In telephony, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a parcel format mismatch. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07319121; Issue ID: ALPS07319121.

In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In engineermode service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In camera service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In power manager, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In sendDeviceState_1_6 of RadioExt.cpp, there is a possible use after free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In telecom service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In hasInteractAcrossUsersFullPermission of AppInfoBase.java, there is a possible way to grant permissions to an app on the secondary user from the primary user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In ion service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In telecom service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

In wifi service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed

Improper access control vulnerability in dynamic receiver in ApkInstaller prior to SMR MAR-2022 Release allows unauthorized attackers to execute arbitrary activity without a proper permission

Security misconfiguration of RKP in kernel prior to SMR Mar-2022 Release 1 allows a system not to be protected by RKP.

When the device is in factory state, it can be access the shell without adb authentication process. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-210010.