The My wpdb WordPress plugin before 2.5 is missing CSRF check when running SQL queries, which could allow attacker to make a logged in admin run arbitrary SQL query via a CSRF attack

Combodo iTop is a simple, web based IT Service Management tool. A CSRF can be performed on CSV import simulation. This issue has been fixed in versions 3.1.2 and 3.2.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

An issue was discovered in Firmware Analysis and Comparison Tool v3.2. Logged in administrators could be targeted by a CSRF attack through visiting a crafted web page.

Team Password Manager (aka TeamPasswordManager) before 10.135.236 has a CSRF vulnerability during import.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Tran Table of Contents Plus plugin <= 2302 versions.

The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HTML5 Maps 1.6.5.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

The Home Assistant Companion for iOS and macOS app up to version 2023.4 are vulnerable to Client-Side Request Forgery. Attackers may send malicious links/QRs to victims that, when visited, will make the victim to call arbitrary services in their Home Assistant installation. Combined with this security advisory, may result in full compromise and remote code execution (RCE). Version 2023.7 addresses this issue and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. This issue is also tracked as GitHub Security Lab (GHSL) Vulnerability Report: GHSL-2023-161.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Simpson Add Shortcodes Actions And Filters plugin <= 2.0.9 versions.

The Process Steps Template Designer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to conduct unspecified attacks via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Better Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import settings via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SwitchWP WP Client Reports.This issue affects WP Client Reports: from n/a through 1.0.22.

An issue was discovered in xiaohuanxiong CMS 5.0.17. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can that can add the administrator account.

Elcomplus SmartPTT SCADA Server web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Doctor WooCommerce Login Redirect plugin <= 2.2.4 versions.

Mattermost fails to validate if a relative path is passed in /plugins/playbooks/api/v0/telemetry/run/<telem_run_id> as a telemetry run ID, allowing an attacker to use a path traversal payload that points to a different endpoint leading to a CSRF attack.

The Bulk Page Creator WordPress plugin before 1.1.4 does not protect its page creation functionalities with nonce checks, which makes them vulnerable to CSRF.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zizou1988 IRivYou plugin <= 2.2.1 versions.

The Crisp Live Chat WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation via the crisp_plugin_settings_page function found in the ~/crisp.php file, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 0.31.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in katlings pyambic-pentameter. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The name of the patch is 974f21aa1b2527ef39c8afe1a5060548217deca8. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-216498 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Repuso Social proof testimonials and reviews by Repuso plugin <= 5.00 versions.

A flaw was found in Moodle in versions 3.11 to 3.11.3, 3.10 to 3.10.7, 3.9 to 3.9.10 and earlier unsupported versions. The "delete related badge" functionality did not include the necessary token check to prevent a CSRF risk.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paid Memberships Pro.This issue affects Paid Memberships Pro: from n/a through 2.12.10.

A Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in KindEditor 4.1.x, as demonstrated by examples/uploadbutton.html.

Under certain circumstances the exacqVision Web Services may be susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paid Memberships Pro.This issue affects Paid Memberships Pro: from n/a through 2.12.10.

The WordPress Menu Plugin — Superfly Responsive Menu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_handle_delete_icons() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Please not the CSRF was patched in 5.0.28, however, adequate directory traversal protection wasn't introduced until 5.0.30.

showdoc is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Checkfront Inc. Checkfront Online Booking System plugin <= 3.6 versions.

SuiteCRM through 7.11.21 is vulnerable to CSRF, with resultant remote code execution, via the UpgradeWizard functionality, if a PHP file is included in a ZIP archive.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in KaizenCoders Short URL plugin <= 1.6.8 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Personalized WooCommerce Cart Page 2.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

The Button Widget Smartsoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the smartsoftbutton_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho SalesIQ 1.0.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

calibre-web is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

snipe-it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

spree_auth_devise is an open source library which provides authentication and authorization services for use with the Spree storefront framework by using an underlying Devise authentication framework. In affected versions spree_auth_devise is subject to a CSRF vulnerability that allows user account takeover. All applications using any version of the frontend component of spree_auth_devise are affected if protect_from_forgery method is both: Executed whether as: A before_action callback (the default). A prepend_before_action (option prepend: true given) before the :load_object hook in Spree::UserController (most likely order to find). Configured to use :null_session or :reset_session strategies (:null_session is the default in case the no strategy is given, but rails --new generated skeleton use :exception). Users are advised to update their spree_auth_devise gem. For users unable to update it may be possible to change your strategy to :exception. Please see the linked GHSA for more workaround details. ### Impact CSRF vulnerability that allows user account takeover. All applications using any version of the frontend component of `spree_auth_devise` are affected if `protect_from_forgery` method is both: * Executed whether as: * A before_action callback (the default) * A prepend_before_action (option prepend: true given) before the :load_object hook in Spree::UserController (most likely order to find). * Configured to use :null_session or :reset_session strategies (:null_session is the default in case the no strategy is given, but rails --new generated skeleton use :exception). That means that applications that haven't been configured differently from what it's generated with Rails aren't affected. Thanks @waiting-for-dev for reporting and providing a patch �� ### Patches Spree 4.3 users should update to spree_auth_devise 4.4.1 Spree 4.2 users should update to spree_auth_devise 4.2.1 ### Workarounds If possible, change your strategy to :exception: ```ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base protect_from_forgery with: :exception end ``` Add the following to`config/application.rb `to at least run the `:exception` strategy on the affected controller: ```ruby config.after_initialize do Spree::UsersController.protect_from_forgery with: :exception end ``` ### References https://github.com/solidusio/solidus_auth_devise/security/advisories/GHSA-xm34-v85h-9pg2

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Supsystic Contact Form by Supsystic plugin <= 1.7.27 versions.

IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 289234.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webTareas version 2.4 and earlier allows a remote attacker to create a new administrative profile and add a new user to the new profile. without the victim's knowledge, by enticing an authenticated admin user to visit an attacker's web page.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mailrelay plugin <= 2.1.1 versions.

MetInfo 7.0.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via admin/?n=admin&c=index&a=doSaveInfo.

Galette is a membership management web application built for non profit organizations and released under GPLv3. Versions prior to 0.9.6 do not check for Cross Site Request Forgery attacks. All users are advised to upgrade to 0.9.6 as soon as possible. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in phpRedisAdmin up to 1.17.3. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.18.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is b9039adbb264c81333328faa9575ecf8e0d2be94. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216471.

DedeCMS v5.7 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /src/dede/member_scores.php.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bernhard Kau Backend Localization plugin <= 2.1.10 versions.

The Contact Form With Captcha WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation in the ~/cfwc-form.php file during contact form submission, which made it possible for attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in versions up to, and including 1.6.2.

livehelperchat is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Related YouTube Videos versions prior to 1.9.9 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Streama up to and including v1.10.3. The application does not have CSRF checks in place when performing actions such as uploading local files. As a result, attackers could make a logged-in administrator upload arbitrary local files via a CSRF attack and send them to the attacker.