Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changeson behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changes on behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p1, 2.4.6-p6, 2.4.5-p8, 2.4.4-p9 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to bypass security features and perform minor integrity changes on behalf of a user. The vulnerability could be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a link or loading a page that submits a malicious request. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.2-p2 (and earlier), 2.4.3 (and earlier) and 2.3.7p1 (and earlier) are affected by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via a Wishlist Share Link. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized addition to customer cart by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation.

A regression affecting Adobe Flash Player version 27.0.0.187 (and earlier versions) causes the unintended reset of the global settings preference file when a user clears browser data.

Adobe ColdFusion versions 2023.5 (and earlier) and 2021.11 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to impact a minor integrity feature. Exploitation of this issue does require user interaction.

Acrobat Reader DC versions versions 2020.013.20074 (and earlier), 2020.001.30018 (and earlier) and 2017.011.30188 (and earlier) are missing support for an integrity check. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to modify content in a certified PDF without invalidating the certification. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open the tampered file.

Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.231 and 14.x before 14.0.0.145 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.394 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 14.0.0.137 on Android, Adobe AIR SDK before 14.0.0.137, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 14.0.0.137 do not properly restrict the SWF file format, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks against JSONP endpoints, and obtain sensitive information, via a crafted OBJECT element with SWF content satisfying the character-set requirements of a callback API.

Adobe Acrobat Reader Plugin before 8.0.0 for the Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Opera web browsers allows remote attackers to force the browser to make unauthorized requests to other web sites via a URL in the (1) FDF, (2) xml, and (3) xfdf AJAX request parameters, following the # (hash) character, aka "Universal CSRF and session riding."

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 8.0, 8.0.1, 9.0, and 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.2 and earlier have a vulnerability that could be used in Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A high-privileged attacker could trick a victim into executing unintended actions on a web application where the victim is authenticated, potentially allowing unauthorized access or modification of sensitive data. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a malicious website or click on a crafted link. Scope is changed.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe Connect before 9.5.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.241 and 19.x before 19.0.0.185 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.521 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 19.0.0.190, Adobe AIR SDK before 19.0.0.190, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 19.0.0.190 do not properly restrict the SWF file format, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks against JSONP endpoints, and obtain sensitive information, via a crafted OBJECT element with SWF content satisfying the character-set requirements of a callback API. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-4671 and CVE-2014-5333.

Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.292 and 14.x through 18.x before 18.0.0.160 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.466 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 18.0.0.144 on Windows and before 18.0.0.143 on OS X and Android, Adobe AIR SDK before 18.0.0.144 on Windows and before 18.0.0.143 on OS X, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 18.0.0.144 on Windows and before 18.0.0.143 on OS X allow remote attackers to bypass a CVE-2014-5333 protection mechanism via unspecified vectors.

Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.241 and 14.x before 14.0.0.176 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.400 on Linux, Adobe AIR before 14.0.0.178 on Windows and OS X and before 14.0.0.179 on Android, Adobe AIR SDK before 14.0.0.178, and Adobe AIR SDK & Compiler before 14.0.0.178 do not properly restrict the SWF file format, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks against JSONP endpoints, and obtain sensitive information, via a crafted OBJECT element with SWF content satisfying the character-set requirements of a callback API, in conjunction with a manipulation involving a '$' (dollar sign) or '(' (open parenthesis) character. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-4671.

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could be exploited to cause a denial-of-service condition. An attacker could trick a logged-in user into submitting a forged request to the vulnerable application, which may disrupt service availability. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, typically in the form of clicking a malicious link or visiting an attacker-controlled website.

Magento versions 2.4.1 (and earlier), 2.4.0-p1 (and earlier) and 2.3.6 (and earlier) are affected by a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via the GraphQL API. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized modification of customer metadata by an unauthenticated attacker. Access to the admin console is not required for successful exploitation.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0 before Update 13, 9.0.1 before Update 12, 9.0.2 before Update 7, 10 before Update 14, and 11 before Update 2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.4, 6.3 and 6.2 have a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to sensitive information disclosure.

Interaction error between Adobe Flash and multiple Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) services allow remote attackers to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) style attacks by using the Flash navigateToURL function to send a SOAP message to a UPnP control point, as demonstrated by changing the primary DNS server.

Adobe Flash Player 8.0.34.0 and earlier insufficiently validates HTTP Referer headers, which might allow remote attackers to conduct a CSRF attack via a crafted SWF file.

Adobe Experience Manager version 6.4 and ealier have a Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to Sensitive Information disclosure in the context of the current user.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed write operations on a victim-owned repository by exploiting incorrect request types. A mitigating factor is that the attacker would have to be a trusted GitHub Enterprise Server user, and the victim would have to visit a tag in the attacker's fork of their own repository. vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior 3.14 and was fixed in version 3.13.1, 3.12.6, 3.11.12, 3.10.14, and 3.9.17. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in RequirementsBypassPage.php of Scratch Wiki scratch-confirmaccount-v3 allows attackers to modify account request requirement bypasses.

mysiteforme, as of 19-12-2022, has a CSRF vulnerability in the background blog management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, a blog tag will be added

07FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /erp.07fly.net:80/oa/OaTask/edit.html.

The Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpcf7cf_admin_init function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Comtrend router WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820, affecting the GRG-4280us version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application to which he is authenticated.

IBM TXSeries for Multiplatforms 9.1 and 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

TYPO3 is a free and open source Content Management Framework. A vulnerability has been identified in the backend user interface functionality involving deep links. Specifically, this functionality is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Additionally, state-changing actions in downstream components incorrectly accepted submissions via HTTP GET and did not enforce the appropriate HTTP method. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires the victim to have an active session on the backend user interface and to be deceived into interacting with a malicious URL targeting the backend, which can occur under the following conditions: The user opens a malicious link, such as one sent via email. The user visits a compromised or manipulated website while the following settings are misconfigured: 1. `security.backend.enforceReferrer` feature is disabled, 2. `BE/cookieSameSite` configuration is set to lax or none. The vulnerability in the affected downstream component “Dashboard Module” allows attackers to manipulate the victim’s dashboard configuration. Users are advised to update to TYPO3 versions 11.5.42 ELTS, 12.4.25 LTS, 13.4.3 LTS which fix the problem described. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

TYPO3 is a free and open source Content Management Framework. A vulnerability has been identified in the backend user interface functionality involving deep links. Specifically, this functionality is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). Additionally, state-changing actions in downstream components incorrectly accepted submissions via HTTP GET and did not enforce the appropriate HTTP method. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires the victim to have an active session on the backend user interface and to be deceived into interacting with a malicious URL targeting the backend, which can occur under the following conditions: The user opens a malicious link, such as one sent via email. The user visits a compromised or manipulated website while the following settings are misconfigured: 1. `security.backend.enforceReferrer` feature is disabled, 2. `BE/cookieSameSite` configuration is set to lax or none. The vulnerability in the affected downstream component “Log Module” allows attackers to remove log entries. Users are advised to update to TYPO3 versions 11.5.42 ELTS, 12.4.25 LTS, 13.4.3 LTS which fix the problem described. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Plesk 18.0.37 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows an attacker to insert data on the user and admin panel. NOTE: the vendor states that this is only a site-specific problem on websites of one or more Plesk users

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities leading to single or bulk e-mail entries deletion discovered in Email Tracker WordPress plugin (versions <= 5.2.6).

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in OPMS v1.3 and below allows attackers to arbitrarily add a user account via /user/add.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ben Marshall Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Jobify - Job Board WordPress Theme: from n/a through 4.2.3.

@fastify/passport is a port of passport authentication library for the Fastify ecosystem. The CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forger) protection enforced by the `@fastify/csrf-protection` library, when combined with `@fastify/passport` in affected versions, can be bypassed by network and same-site attackers. `fastify/csrf-protection` implements the synchronizer token pattern (using plugins `@fastify/session` and `@fastify/secure-session`) by storing a random value used for CSRF token generation in the `_csrf` attribute of a user's session. The `@fastify/passport` library does not clear the session object upon authentication, preserving the `_csrf` attribute between pre-login and authenticated sessions. Consequently, CSRF tokens generated before authentication are still valid. Network and same-site attackers can thus obtain a CSRF token for their pre-session, fixate that pre-session in the victim's browser via cookie tossing, and then perform a CSRF attack after the victim authenticates. As a solution, newer versions of `@fastify/passport` include the configuration options: `clearSessionOnLogin (default: true)` and `clearSessionIgnoreFields (default: ['passport', 'session'])` to clear all the session attributes by default, preserving those explicitly defined in `clearSessionIgnoreFields`.

In mblog <= 3.5.0 there is a CSRF vulnerability in the background article management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, the article will be deleted.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Creative Motion Disable Admin Notices individually allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Disable Admin Notices individually: from n/a through 1.3.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Deepak Khokhar, Surender Khokhar Manage User Columns allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Manage User Columns: from n/a through 1.0.5.

glFusion CMS 1.7.9 is affected by a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /public_html/admin/plugins/bad_behavior2/blacklist.php. Using the CSRF vulnerability to trick the administrator to click, an attacker can add a blacklist.

The Widget Bundle WordPress plugin through 2.0.0 does not have CSRF checks when logging Widgets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin enable/disable widgets via a CSRF attack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WhileTrue Most And Least Read Posts Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Most And Least Read Posts Widget: from n/a through 2.5.18.

The Elementor Addon Elements plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.12.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the eae_save_elements function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable/disable elementor addon elements via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Amministrazione Trasparente plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the at_save_aturl_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

IBM OpenPages with Watson 8.3 and 9.0 IBM OpenPages could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper validation and management of authentication cookies. By modifying the CSRF token and Session Id cookie parameters using the cookies of another user, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass security restrictions and gain unauthorized access to the vulnerable application.

IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

The Defender Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the verify_otp_login_time() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to verify a one time login via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Tran Table of Contents Plus allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Table of Contents Plus: from n/a through 2408.