The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make users join private groups via a CSRF attack
The Discy WordPress theme before 5.2 lacks CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, allowing an attacker to make a logged in admin change arbitrary 's settings including payment methods via a CSRF attack
The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make users vote on any polls, including those they don't have access to via a CSRF attack
The Himer WordPress theme before 2.1.1 does not sanitise and escape some of its Post settings, which could allow high privilege users such as Contributor to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks
The lacks CSRF checks allowing a user to invite any user to any group (including private groups)
The WPQA Builder WordPress plugin before 5.9 does not have CSRF check when following and unfollowing users, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform such actions via CSRF attacks
The Discy WordPress theme before 5.2 does not check for CSRF tokens in the AJAX action discy_reset_options, allowing an attacker to trick an admin into resetting the site settings back to defaults.
The Ask me WordPress theme before 6.8.2 does not perform CSRF checks for any of its AJAX actions, allowing an attacker to trick logged in users to perform various actions on their behalf on the site.
The WPQA Builder WordPress plugin before 6.1.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi Browser Theme Color.This issue affects Browser Theme Color: from n/a through 1.3.
The WP Meta Sort Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the top-level included script in msp-options.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's msp_loop_file and msp_nav_location settings via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Julian Weinert // cs&m Hover Image plugin <= 1.4.1 versions.
Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Tribe29's Checkmk <= 2.1.0p17, Checkmk <= 2.0.0p31, and all versions of Checkmk 1.6.0 (EOL) allow an attacker to add new visual elements to multiple pages.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roland Barker, xnau webdesign Participants Database plugin <= 2.4.5 leads to list column update.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1.
The Silencesoft RSS Reader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sil_rss_edit_page' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete RSS feeds via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
The Depicter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions less than, or equal to, 4.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the depicter-document-rules-store function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify document rules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
A vulnerability was found in dolibarr_project_timesheet up to 4.5.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Form Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 4.5.6.a is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 082282e9dab43963e6c8f03cfaddd7921de377f4. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216880.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nicearma DNUI plugin <= 2.8.1 versions.
The Chained Products WordPress plugin before 2.12.0 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks, as well as does not ensure that the option to be updated belong to the plugin, allowing unauthenticated attackers to set arbitrary options to 'no'
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in chronoengine.Com Chronoforms plugin <= 7.0.9 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in voidCoders Void Contact Form 7 Widget For Elementor Page Builder plugin <= 2.1.1 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Simple Share Buttons Simple Share Buttons Adder plugin <= 8.4.7 versions.
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Academy LMS before v5.10 allows a discount coupon to be arbitrarily created if an attacker with administrative privileges interacts on the CSRF page.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marty Thornley Import External Images plugin <= 1.4 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VillaTheme Thank You Page Customizer for WooCommerce – Increase Your Sales plugin <= 1.0.13 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pi Websolution CSS JS Manager, Async JavaScript, Defer Render Blocking CSS supports WooCommerce plugin <= 2.4.49 versions.
The Pretty Links – Affiliate Links, Link Branding, Link Tracking & Marketing Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's configuration including stripe integration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dannie Herdyawan DH – Anti AdBlocker plugin <= 36 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Uwe Jacobs OWM Weather plugin <= 5.6.11 leads to post duplication as a draft.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plugincraft Mediamatic – Media Library Folders plugin <= 2.8.1 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes ShopLentor plugin <= 2.6.2 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Marty Thornley Bulk Resize Media plugin <= 1.1 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chasil Universal Star Rating plugin <= 2.1.0 version.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VillaTheme Cart All In One For WooCommerce plugin <= 1.1.10 leading to cart modification.
An issue was discovered in Joomla! through 3.9.19. A missing token check in the ajax_install endpoint of com_installer causes a CSRF vulnerability.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pierre Lebedel Kodex Posts likes plugin <= 2.4.3 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VillaTheme Thank You Page Customizer for WooCommerce – Increase Your Sales plugin <= 1.0.13 versions.
A vulnerability was found in Auto Upload Images up to 3.3.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/setting-page.php of the component Settings Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 3.3.1 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 895770ee93887ec78429c78ffdfb865bee6f9436. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-216482 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
The Sertifier Certificate & Badge Maker for WordPress – Tutor LMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'sertifier_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's api key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in StaxWP Visibility Logic for Elementor plugin <= 2.3.4 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Starter Templates plugin <= 3.1.20 versions.
A vulnerability has been found in 495300897 wx-shop up to de1b66331368695779cfc6e4d11a64caddf8716e and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPManageNinja LLC Ninja Tables – Best Data Table Plugin for WordPress plugin <= 4.3.4 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Joseph C Dolson My Tickets plugin <= 1.9.10 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Supsystic Slider by Supsystic plugin <= 1.8.5 versions.
A vulnerability was found in atjiu pybbs up to 6.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function setCookie of the file src/main/java/co/yiiu/pybbs/util/CookieUtil.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is named 8aa2bb1aef3346e49aec6358edf5e47ce905ae7b. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RadiusTheme The Post Grid plugin <= 5.0.4 versions.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mathieu Chartier WordPress WP-Advanced-Search plugin <= 3.3.8 versions.
The Restore Permanently delete Post or Page Data plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rp_dpo_dpa_ajax_dp_delete_data() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.