A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in significant-gravitas/autogpt version v0.5.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the AutoGPT server. The vulnerability stems from the lack of protections on the API endpoint receiving instructions, enabling an attacker to direct a user running AutoGPT in their local network to a malicious website. This site can then send crafted requests to the AutoGPT server, leading to command execution. The issue is exacerbated by CORS being enabled for arbitrary origins by default, allowing the attacker to read the response of all cross-site queries. This vulnerability was addressed in version 5.1.

The File Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_file_manager page that includes files through the 'lang' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include local JavaScript files that can be leveraged to achieve RCE via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This issue was partially patched in version 7.2.4, and fully patched in 7.2.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amit Agarwal Google XML Sitemap for Videos plugin <= 2.6.1 versions.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Concrete CMS <v9 that could allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of other users.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device with the privileges of the targeted user.

A CVE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists that could allow an attacker to impersonate the user or carry out actions on their behalf when crafted malicious parameters are submitted in POST requests sent to the charging station web server. Affected Products: EVlink City EVC1S22P4 / EVC1S7P4 (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2 ), EVlink Parking EVW2 / EVF2 / EVP2PE (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2), and EVlink Smart Wallbox EVB1A (All versions prior to R8 V3.4.0.2)

MK-AUTH through 19.01 K4.9 allows CSRF for password changes via the central/executar_central.php?acao=altsenha_princ URI.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Fortinet FortiVoiceEnterprise version 6.4.x, 6.0.x, FortiSwitch version 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.7, 6.0.x, FortiMail version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4.0 through 6.4.6, 6.2.x, 6.0.x FortiRecorder version 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, 6.0.x, 2.7.x, 2.6.x, FortiNDR version 1.x.x allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute commands on the CLI via tricking an authenticated administrator to execute malicious GET requests.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Build With Parameters Plugin 1.5 and earlier allows attackers to build a project with attacker-specified parameters.

Jenkins SAML Plugin 2.0.7 and earlier allows attackers to craft URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Scott Paterson Contact Form 7 Redirect & Thank You Page plugin <= 1.0.3 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sumo Social Share Boost plugin <= 4.5 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM LAN routers (WRC-1167GST2 firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-1167GST2A firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-1167GST2H firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-2533GS2-B firmware v1.52 and prior, WRC-2533GS2-W firmware v1.52 and prior, WRC-1750GS firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-1750GSV firmware v2.11 and prior, WRC-1900GST firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-2533GST firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-2533GSTA firmware v1.03 and prior, WRC-2533GST2 firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-2533GST2SP firmware v1.25 and prior, WRC-2533GST2-G firmware v1.25 and prior, and EDWRC-2533GST2 firmware v1.25 and prior) allows a remote authenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via a specially crafted page.

The NPS computy WordPress plugin through 2.7.5 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chetan Gole WP-CopyProtect [Protect your blog posts] plugin <= 3.1.0 versions.

The Contact Form by Supsystic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.7.24. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the AJAX action handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute AJAX actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Jenkins Azure AD Plugin 179.vf6841393099e and earlier allows attackers to craft URLs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Browser and Operating System Finder versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in QuantumCloud AI ChatBot plugin <= 4.2.8 versions.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Configuration Slicing Plugin 1.51 and earlier allows attackers to apply different slice configurations.

Trendnet AC2600 TEW-827DRU version 2.08B01 does not properly implement csrf protections. Most pages lack proper usage of CSRF protections or mitigations. Additionally, pages that do make use of CSRF tokens are trivially bypassable as the server does not appear to validate them properly (i.e. re-using an old token or finding the token thru some other method is possible).

IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Email Template Designer - WP HTML Mail versions prior to 3.0.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.

The administration web interface for the Arris Surfboard SB8200 lacks any protections against cross-site request forgery attacks. This means that an attacker could make configuration changes (such as changing the administrative password) without the consent of the user.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Optical BB unit E-WMTA2.3 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted page.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Meta Data Filter & Taxonomies Filter versions prior to v.1.2.8 and versions prior to v.2.2.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kagemai 0.8.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

IBM Sterling File Gateway 2.2.0.0 through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 197790.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in PaperCut NG/MF, which, under specific conditions, could potentially enable an attacker to alter security settings or execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited if the target is an admin with a current login session. Exploiting this would typically involve the possibility of deceiving an admin into clicking a specially crafted malicious link, potentially leading to unauthorized changes.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPCS - WordPress Currency Switcher 1.1.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Anton Skorobogatov Rus-To-Lat plugin <= 0.3 versions.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OG Tags versions prior to 2.0.2 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators and unintended operation may be performed via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Unlimited Sitemap Generator versions prior to v8.2 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and conduct arbitrary operation via a specially crafted web page.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Software License Manager versions prior to 4.4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Name Directory 1.17.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management screen of Cybozu Remote Service 3.1.8 to 3.1.9 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of administrators and unintended operations may be performed via unspecified vectors.

A vulnerability was determined in FoundationAgents MetaGPT up to 0.8.1. The impacted element is the function evaluateCode of the file metagpt/environment/minecraft/mineflayer/index.js of the component Mineflayer HTTP API. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 'MicroPayments - Paid Author Subscriptions, Content, Downloads, Membership' versions prior to 1.9.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and perform unintended operation via unspecified vectors.

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks that perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. Note: "Cisco Expressway Series" refers to Cisco Expressway Control (Expressway-C) devices and Cisco Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) devices. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details ["#details"] section of this advisory.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository unilogies/bumsys prior to 2.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SiteAlert plugin <= 1.9.7 versions.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Pluck CMS v4.7.15 allows attackers to change the password of any given user by exploiting this feature leading to account takeover.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on affected devices due to lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BoldGrid Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid – Visual Drag and Drop Editor plugin <= 1.24.1 versions.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in panel.php in UseBB before 1.0.12.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to manipulate an authenticated user into executing malicious actions without their awareness or consent. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a web-based management user to follow a specially crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the authenticated user. These actions include modifying the device configuration, disconnecting the user's session, and executing Command Runner commands.

A Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Advanced Electron Forums (AEF) through 1.0.9 due to inadequate confirmation for sensitive transactions in the administrator functions.

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks that perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. Note: "Cisco Expressway Series" refers to Cisco Expressway Control (Expressway-C) devices and Cisco Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) devices. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details ["#details"] section of this advisory.

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard hosted services could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts. Note: There are internal security mechanisms in place that limit the scope of this exploit, reducing the Security Impact Rating of this vulnerability.