In dvfs_plugin_caller of fvp.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In wlan driver, there is a possible missing permission check, This could lead to local information disclosure.

In wlan driver, there is a possible missing permission check, This could lead to local information disclosure.

A vulnerability of storing sensitive information insecurely in Property Settings prior to SMR Nov-2021 Release 1 allows attackers to read ESN value without priviledge.

In BTA_DmPinReply of bta_dm_api.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-8.0 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-139287605

Using unsafe PendingIntent in Slow Motion Editor prior to version 3.5.18.5 allows local attackers unauthorized action without permission via hijacking the PendingIntent.

In shouldUseNoOpLocation of CameraActivity.java, there is a possible confused deputy due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

In onActivityResult of NotificationSoundPreference.java, there is a possible way to hear audio files belonging to a different user due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure across users of a device with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

A potential logging of the firestore key via logging within nodejs-firestore exists - Developers who were logging objects through this._settings would be logging the firestore key as well potentially exposing it to anyone with logs read access. We recommend upgrading to version 6.1.0 to avoid this issue

TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. In affected versions an attacker can read from outside of bounds of heap allocated data by sending specially crafted illegal arguments to `tf.raw_ops.SdcaOptimizerV2`. The [implementation](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/460e000de3a83278fb00b61a16d161b1964f15f4/tensorflow/core/kernels/sdca_internal.cc#L320-L353) does not check that the length of `example_labels` is the same as the number of examples. We have patched the issue in GitHub commit a4e138660270e7599793fa438cd7b2fc2ce215a6. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.6.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.5.1, TensorFlow 2.4.3, and TensorFlow 2.3.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

In getDefaultSmsPackage of RoleManagerService.java, there is a possible way to get information about the default sms app of a different device user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-10Android ID: A-177927831

In startRanging of RttServiceImpl.java, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12Android ID: A-194798757

In onResume of NotificationAccessDetails.java, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12Android ID: A-195412179

In getSigningKeySet of PackageManagerService.java, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12Android ID: A-189857801

In PackageManager, there is a possible way to get information about installed packages ignoring limitations introduced in Android 11 due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-188913056

In sendAccessibilityEvent of NotificationManagerService.java, there is a possible disclosure of notification data due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-11 Android-8.1 Android-9 Android-10Android ID: A-159624555

In Init of protocolnetadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In getDeviceIdWithFeature of PhoneInterfaceManager.java, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-12Android ID: A-186530889

In ProtocolMiscATCommandAdapter::Init() of protocolmiscadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In telephone service, there is a possible improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In SignalStrengthAdapter::FillGsmSignalStrength() of protocolmiscadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In Init of protocolembmsadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In GetSizeOfEenlRecords of protocoladapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In private_handle_t of mali_gralloc_buffer.h, there is a possible information leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In flv extractor, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS05561369; Issue ID: ALPS05561369.

In ProtocolNetSimFileInfoAdapter() of protocolnetadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In dialer service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges.

In parse_gap_data of utils.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In firewall service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In engineermode, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In telecom service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In firewall service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In firewall service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In engineermode, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In telephony service, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In imsservice, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In firewall service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In ffa_mrd_prot of shared_mem.c, there is a possible ID due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-242203672References: N/A

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In validationtools, there is a possible missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In omacp service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In telecom service, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In imsservice, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed

In imsservice, there is a possible way to write permission usage records of an app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed